Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

state Constitution is of less consequence than the general common or statute law?

Under modern state constitutions, individual rights were supposed to have been protected. No man's property shall be taken or damaged for public use without just compensation ascertained by court and jury or court and commissioners in advance and paid in advance. But now state constitutions dispense with the special, peculiar, exceptive benefit-they dispense with the general benefit and with arch fiendish boldness acts of taking and acts of damaging are done and the wronged citizen is taxed with the cost of taking or damaging his own property, notwithstanding such acts were prohibited by the Constitution. If God's government be just, state constitutions with such moral leprosy in them ought not and cannot long endure. Our constitutions cannot reverse the judgments and decrees of the Almighty. There may be apparent prosperity but it is not real. Our people in our cities, towns and villages are walking through the graveyard, whistling to keep their courage up. That which is taken to be healthful life and vigor is not real; it is the death rattle. It is an invitation to a Belshazzar's feast where sooner or later will appear the fatal handwriting on the wall.

Restore the Constitution. Make it possible for the honest citizen to hold and use his property in spite of anything that may be done by the Empsons and Dudleys, the Dantons, the Robespierres and Marats of modern times.

TABLE OF CASES.

[blocks in formation]

Bank v. Buckingham, 5 Howard 317

Baltimore & Penn. R. R. Co. v. Ohio R. R. Co., 60 Maryland
Bank of Chicago Union v. Kansas City Bank, 136 U. S. 223
Barber Asphalt Paving Company v. French, 158 Mo. 534
Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548

130, 167

[blocks in formation]

Bay City v. State Treasurer, 23 Mich. 499

Bergman v. Backer, 157 U. S. 655

Boyd v. U. S., 116 U. S. 616

Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheaton 439

Bryson v. Rosanna Campbell, 12 Mo. 498

Bryson v. Bryson, 17 Mo. 590

Bryson by next friend v. Bryson, 17 Mo. 590

C.

Cameron v. Stephenson, 69 Mo. 372

Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103

Chaoney v. Hoover, 9 Ben Monroe 330
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, 11 Pet. 420
Chicago Ins. Co. v. Needles, 113 U. S. 574

.319, 320

347

77

179

331

332

333

.8, 15, 65, 172

.341, 355, 358

15

160

345

Chicago Union Bank v. Kansas City Bank, 136 U. S. 223
Christie v. Pridgen, 4 Wall. 196

317

.315, 350

City of Kansas to use of Coates v. Ridenour, 84 Mo. 253

74, 244, 276, 311

City of Louisiana v. Miller, 66 Mo. 467

58

City of Pleasant Hill v. Dasher, 120 Mo. 675
City of St. Charles v. Nolle, 51 Mo. 122 (see St. Charles v. Nolle)

.58, 65

City of St. Joseph v Anthony, 30 Mo. 537

.48, 62

City of St. Joseph to use v. Owen, 110 Mo. 445

218

City of St. Louis v. Davidson, 102 Mo. 149

204

City of St. Louis to use of Seibert v. Allen, 53 Mo. 44

33, 53, 58, 59, 60, 63, 65, 69, 107, 135, 137, 157, 172, 180

« ForrigeFortsett »