...Lane v. Atlantic World, 111 Mass. 136, ,t was said: 'The test is to be fonnd in the probable injurions consequences which were to be anticipated, not in...subsequent events and agencies which might arise.' Events may cast their shadows before, so as to render an act wrong, but they cannot cast them backward,...

...necessary to the injurious effect of the original negligence will not excuse the first wrong-doer, if such act ought to have been foreseen. The original negligence still remains a culpable and direct canse of the injury. The test is to be found in the probable injurious consequences, which were to...

...against, the original negligence continued and remained a culpable and direct cause of the injury,and the test is to be found in the probable injurious...which might arise. Lane v. Atlantic Works, 111 Mass. 130. Mr. Wharton on Negligence, § 85, states the doctrine thus: " As a legal proposition we may conNagel...

...the act complained of was the remote or proximate cause of the injury is to be found in the probably injurious consequences which were to be anticipated,...subsequent events and agencies which might arise. 1 Thompson's Commentaries on the Law of Negligence, § 58." In the case of Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co....

...It will be seen from the various expressions made by the authorities upon this vexing subject that the test is to be found in the probable injurious consequences which were to be anticipated and not in the number of subsequent events or agencies which might arise. In other words, if the probable...

...of recovery to depend upon the injury which the evidence may show followed asa sequence of the act. "The test is to be found in the probable injurious...might arise." Lane v. Atlantic Works, 111 Mass. 136. True, if the question be whether or not the injurious act was purposely committed, it may aid in arriving...

...condition necessary to the injurious effect of the original negligence, will not excuse the first wrongdoer if such act ought to have been foreseen. The original...subsequent events and agencies which might arise." Colt, J., in Lane v. Atlantic Works, 111 Mass. 136. In that case the negligence charged consisted in...

...necessary to the injurious effect of the original negligence, will not excuse the first wrongdoer, if such act ought to have been foreseen. The original...subsequent events and agencies which might arise." The law on this point Is very tersely and clearly summed up in 21 A. & EE of L. pp. 495 and 494, as...

...Justice Stayton quotes with approval from Lane v. Atlantic Works, 111 Mass. 139, as follows: "The test la to be found In the probable Injurious consequences which were to be anticipated, not on the number of subsequent events and agencies which might arise." In discussing this question, the...

...condition necessary to the injurious effect of the original negligence will not excuse the first wrongdoer, if such act ought to have been foreseen. The original...subsequent events and agencies which might arise.'' In that case it was held immaterial whether the act of the boy in moving the truck and thus causing...