Book 1. - And if the angle BAD be equal to the opposite angle

BCD, and the angle ABC to ADC; the opposite sides are equal : Because, by Prop. 32, B. 1. all the angles of the quadrilateral figure ABCD are toge

D ther equal to four right angles, and the two angles BAD, ADC are together equal to the two angles BCD, ABC: Wherefore BAD, ADC are the half of all the four angles; that is, BAD and ADC are equal to two right angles : and therefore AB, Cl) are parallels by Prop. 28. B. 1. In the same manner, AD, BC are parallels: Therefore ABCD is a parallelogram, and its opposite sides are equal, by 34th Prop. B. ).

PROP. VII. B. I. There are two cases of this proposition, one of which is not in the Greek text, but is as necessary as the other: And that the case left out has been formerly in the text, appears plainly from this, that the second part of Prop. 5. which is necessary to the demonstration of this case, can be of no use at all in the Elements, or any where else, but in this . demonstration; because the second part of Prop. 5. clearly

follows from the first part, and Prop. 13. B. 1. This part must therefore have been added to Prop. 5. upon account of some proposition betwixt the 5th and 13th, but none of these stand in need of it except the 7th Proposition, on ac. count of which it has been added : Besides, the translation from the Arabic has this case explicitly demonstrated. And Proclus acknowledges, that the second part of Prop. 5. was added upon account of Prop. 7. but gives a ridiculous rea. · son for it, “ that it might afford an answer to objections “ made against the 7th,” as if the case of the 7th, which is left out, were, as he expressly makes it, an objection against the proposition itself. Whoever is curious may read what Proclus says of this in his commentary on the 5th and 7th Propositions; for it is not worth while to relate his trifles at full length.

It was thought proper to change the enunciation of this 7th Prop. so as to preserve the very same meaning; the literal translation from the Greek being extremely harsh, and difficult to be understood by beginners.

Book I.

PROP. XI. B. I. A COROLLARY is added to this proposition, which is necessary to Prop. 1. B. XI, and otherwise.

PROP. XX. and XXI. B. I. PROCLUs, in his commentary,relates, that the Epicureans derided this proposition, as being manifest even to asses, and needing no demonstration; and his answer is, that though the truth of it be manifest to our senses, yet it is science which must give the reason why two sides of a triangle are greater than the third : But the right answer to this objection against this and the 21st, and some other plain propositions, is, that the number of axioms ought not to be increased without necessity, as it must be if these propositions be not demonstrated. Mons. Clairault, in the Preface to his Elements of Geometry, published in French at Paris, anno 1741, says, That Euclid has been at the pains to prove, that the two sides of a triangle which is included within another, are together less than the two sides of the triangle which includes it; but he has forgot to add this condition, viz. that the triangles must be upon the same base : because, unless this be added, the sides of the included triangle may be greater than the sides of the triangle which includes it, in any ratio which is less than that of two to one, as Pappus Alexandrinus has demonstrated in Prop. 3. B. 3. of his mathematical collections.

PROP. XXII. B. I. SOME authors blame Euclid because he does not demonstrate that the two circles made use of in the construction of this problem must cut one another: But this is very plain from the determination he has given, viz, that any two of the straight lines DF, FG, GH, must be greater than the third. For who is so dull, though only beginning to learn the Elements, as not to perceive that the M F C - H circle described from the centre F, at the distance FD, must meet FH betwixt F and H, because FD is less than FH; and that, for the like reason, the circle described from the centre G, at the distance GH or GM, must meet DG betwixt D and G; and

Boox I. that these circles must meet one another, because FD and

GH are togethergreater than
FG? And this determination
is easier to be understood
than that which Mr. Thomas
Simpson derives from it, and
puts instead of Euclid's, in D M F G H
the 49th page of his Ele-
ments of Geometry, that he may supply the omission he
blames Euclid for, which determination is, that any of the
three straight lines must be less than the sum, but greater
than the difference of the other two: From this he shows
the circles must meet one another, in one case; and says,
that it may be proved after the same manner in any other
case : But the straight line GM, which he bids take from
GF may be greater than it, as in the figure here annexed; in
which case his demonstration must be changed into another.

PROP. XXIV. B. I. . . To this is added, “ of the two sides DE, DF, let DE, be “that which is not greater than the other;" that is, take that side of the two DE, DF which is not greater than the other, in order to make with it the angle EDG equal to BAC; because without this restriction there might be three different cases of the proposition, as Campanus and others make.

Mr. Thomas Simpson, in p. 262 of the second edition of his Elements of Geometry, printed anno 1760, observes in his notes, that it

GI ought to have been shown, that the point F falls below the line EG.

F This probably Euclid omitted, as it is very easy to perceive, that DG being equal to DF, the point G is in the circumference of a circle described from the centre D at the distance DF, and must be in that part of it which is above the straight line EF, because DG falls above DF, the angle EDG being greater than the angle EDF.

PROP. XXIX. B. I. The proposition which is usually called the 5th postulate, or 11th axiom, by some the 12th, on which this 29th depends, has given a great deal to do, both to ancient and

modern "geometers: It seems not to be properly placed Book I. among the axioms, as indeed it is not self-evident; but it may be demonstrated thus :

DEFINITION İ. The distance of a point from a straight line, is the perpendicular drawn to it from the point.

DEF. 2. One straight line is said to go nearer to, or further from, another straight line, when the distances of the points of the first from the other straight line become less or greater than they were ; and two straight lines are said to keep the same distance from one another, when the distance of the points of one of them from the other is always the same.

AXIOM. A STRAIGHT line cannot first come nearer to another straight line, and then go fur. A ther from it, before it cuts it; and, in like manner, a straight Dline cannot go further from an- T

MH other straight line, and then come nearer to it; nor can a straight line keep the same distance from another straight line, and then come nearer to it, or go further from it; for a straight line keeps always the same direction.

For example, the straight line ABC cannot first come nearer to the straight line DE, as from the point A to the point B, A

LC See the and then, from the point B to the D

E above point C, go further from the same F G

figure, DE: And, in like manner, the straight line FGH cannot go further from DE, as from F to G, and then from G to H, come nearer to the same DE: And so in the last case, as in fig. 2.

PROP. I. If two equal straight lines AC, BD, be each at right angles to the same straight line AB: If the points C, D be joined by the straight line CD, the straight line EF drawn from any point E in AB unto CD, at right angles to AB, shall be equal to AC, or BD.

If EF be not equal to AC, one of them must be greater than the other; let AC be the greater: then, because FE is less than CA, the straight line CFD is nearer to the

[ocr errors]


Book I. straight line AB at the point F than at the point C, that is,

CF comes nearer to AB from
the point C to F: But because
DB is greater than FE, the C
straight line CFD is further
from AB at the point D than at
F, that is, FD goes further from
AB from F to D: Therefore the
straight line CFD first comes

E B nearer to the straight line AB, and then goes further from it, before it cuts it: which is impossible : If FE be said to be greater than CA, or DB, the straight line CFD first goes further from the straight line AB, and then comes nearer to it, which is also impossible. Therefore FE is not unequal to AC, that is, it is equal to it. :

PROP. II. If two equal straight lines AC, BD be each at right angles to the same straight line AB; the straight line CD which joins their extremities makes right angles with AC and BV.

Join AD, BC; and because, in the triangles CAB, DBA,

CA, AB are equal to DB, BA, and the angle CAB equal * 4. 1. to the angle DBA; the base BC is equal a to the base AD:

And in the triangles ACD, BDC, AC, CD are equal to BD,
DC, and the base AD is equal to C

the base BC. Therefore the an-
08. 1. gle ACD is equalb to the angle

BDC: From any point E in AB
draw EF unto CD, at right angles K
to AB;, therefore by Prop. 1. EF A
is equal to AC, or BD ; wherefore, as has been just now
shown, the angle ACF is equal to the angle EFC: In the
same manner, the angle BDF is equal to the angle EFD;

but the angles ACD, BDC are equal ; therefore the angles < 10 Def. 1. EFC and EFD are equal, and right anglesc; wherefore

also the angles ACD, BDC are right angles.

Cor. Hence, if two straight lines AB, CD be at right angles to the same straight line AC, and if betwixt them a straight line BD he drawn at right angles to either of them, as to AB; then BD is equal to AC, and BDC is a right angle.

If AC be not equal to BD, take BG equal to AC, and join CG: Therefore, by this proposition, the angle ACG is a right angle; but ACD is also a right angle; wherefore the angles

« ForrigeFortsett »