Interoceanic Canal and the Monroe Doctrine: ReportHouse of Representatives, 1881 - 49 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 48
Side i
... America in Congress assembled , That the construction of an interoceanic canal connecting the waters of the Atlantic and Pacific by means of foreign capital , under the auspices of and through a charter from any European government , is ...
... America in Congress assembled , That the construction of an interoceanic canal connecting the waters of the Atlantic and Pacific by means of foreign capital , under the auspices of and through a charter from any European government , is ...
Side ii
... American Republics , whose independence the Governments of Great Britain and of the United States had acknowledged . The schemes of the Holy Alliance , with their unsettled policies , changing from time to time , gave cause of distrust ...
... American Republics , whose independence the Governments of Great Britain and of the United States had acknowledged . The schemes of the Holy Alliance , with their unsettled policies , changing from time to time , gave cause of distrust ...
Side iii
... American question ; for Lord Brougham , in referring to the message , declared in the British Parlia- ment that " the event which is decisive on the subject is the language held with respect to Spanish - America in the message of the ...
... American question ; for Lord Brougham , in referring to the message , declared in the British Parlia- ment that " the event which is decisive on the subject is the language held with respect to Spanish - America in the message of the ...
Side iv
... American minister to Mexico , dated March 25 , 1825 , says that Mr. Monroe uttered his declaration in the face of the world at a moment when there was reason to apprehend that the allied powers were entertaining de- signs inimical to ...
... American minister to Mexico , dated March 25 , 1825 , says that Mr. Monroe uttered his declaration in the face of the world at a moment when there was reason to apprehend that the allied powers were entertaining de- signs inimical to ...
Side v
... America . ] An able writer in the North American Review , in April , 1856 , says : " The message of Mr. Monroe was intended as a caveat to the designs of the allies , and as an earnest protest against the extension to this conti- nent ...
... America . ] An able writer in the North American Review , in April , 1856 , says : " The message of Mr. Monroe was intended as a caveat to the designs of the allies , and as an earnest protest against the extension to this conti- nent ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
The Inter-Oceanic Canal and the Monroe Doctrine (Classic Reprint) Ingen forhåndsvisning tilgjengelig - 2015 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
46TH CONGRESS abrogated affairs allied powers ARTICLE attempt authority Britain build a canal built capital Central America CHAIRMAN charter citizens Clayton-Bulwer treaty Colombian Government commerce committee concession Congress construction continent contract corporation CRAPO cubic meter declaration duty England English Government enterprise ernment establish European power foreign government France French Government French law Government of Colombia Government of Nicaragua Granada granted guarantee Holy Alliance independence interests interfere interoceanic canal Isthmus of Panama joint resolution Lake Nicaragua lands law of France Lesseps ment Mexico Monroe doctrine nations navigation necessary neutrality Nicaragua Canal ocean Pacific coast Panama Canal Company Panama Railroad Company PHELPS ports possession President Monroe principle privileges protect protectorate purpose question reference regard RICE route San Juan River scheme ship ship-canal South American sovereignty strait Suez Canal THOMPSON tion tolls trade transit treaty of 1848 United vessels WEBB Wyse
Populære avsnitt
Side i - This difference proceeds from that which exists in their respective governments. And to the defense of our own, which has been achieved by the loss of so much blood and treasure, and matured by the wisdom of their most enlightened citizens, and under which we have enjoyed unexampled felicity, this whole nation is devoted.
Side i - With the movements in this hemisphere we are of necessity more immediately connected, and by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. The political system of the allied powers is essentially different in this respect from that of America.
Side viii - The Government of New Granada guarantees to the Government of the United States that the right of way or transit across the Isthmus of Panama upon any modes of communication that now exist, or that may be hereafter constructed, shall be open and free to the Government and citizens of the United States...
Side iii - Our first and fundamental maxim should be, never to entangle ourselves in the broils of Europe. Our second, never to suffer Europe to intermeddle with cis-Atlantic affairs. America, North and South, has a set of interests distinct from those of Europe, and peculiarly her own. She should therefore have a system of her own, separate and apart from that of Europe. While the last is laboring to become the domicile of despotism, our endeavor should surely be, to make our hemisphere that of freedom.
Side vi - ... we could not view any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or, controlling in any other manner their destiny, by any European power, in any other light than as a manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States.
Side iii - But the war in which the present proposition might engage us, should that be its consequence, is not her war but ours. Its object is to introduce and establish the American system of keeping out of our land all foreign powers, of never permitting those of Europe to intermeddle with the affairs of our nations. It is to maintain our own principle, not to depart from it.
Side vi - Our policy in regard to Europe, which was adopted at an early stage of the wars which have so long agitated that quarter of the globe, nevertheless remains the same, which is not to interfere in the internal concerns of any of its powers; to consider the government de facto as the legitimate government for us...
Side iii - Nor is the occasion to be slighted which this proposition offers, of declaring our protest against the atrocious violations of the rights of nations, by the interference of any one in the internal affairs of another, so flagitiously begun by Bonaparte, and now continued by the equally lawless Alliance, calling itself Holy.
Side viii - And, in order to secure to themselves the tranquil and constant enjoyment of these advantages, and as an especial compensation for the said advantages and for the favors they have acquired by the 4th, 5th and 6th articles of this Treaty, the United States guarantee positively and efficaciously to New Granada...
Side ii - The question presented by the letters you have sent me, is the most momentous which has ever been offered to my contemplation since that of Independence. That made us a nation, this sets our compass and points the course which we are to steer through the ocean of time opening on us.