United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 157United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1895 |
Innhold
113 | |
118 | |
121 | |
124 | |
139 | |
142 | |
151 | |
160 | |
165 | |
176 | |
187 | |
198 | |
209 | |
219 | |
225 | |
260 | |
271 | |
273 | |
279 | |
286 | |
309 | |
370 | |
429 | |
473 | |
475 | |
513 | |
549 | |
550 | |
576 | |
584 | |
589 | |
590 | |
595 | |
652 | |
659 | |
674 | |
675 | |
687 | |
699 | |
701 | |
716 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action alleged amended amount appears application appointed Argument for Appellants assignment authority Bank bill brake cargo Carpentier cars Central Pacific Railroad charge chose in action Circuit Court citizens city of Oakland claim collector Constitution contract controversy corporation Cumberland Gap decision decree defective delivered the opinion direct taxes Dissenting Opinion District duties Ellenwood entitled entry equity evidence excises exemption fact fee simple filed grant Harlan held Hulburd imposed indictment interest judgment jury Justice Lucien Baker March 25 matter ment Oakland Water Front objection ordinance owner Pacific paid parties payment Pennsylvania Company person plaintiff in error proceedings question Railroad Company Railway reason receiver record recover Revised Statutes rule ship Stat Statement suit tax deed taxation testimony thereof tion town of Oakland tracts trial United verdict vessel Water Front Company Western Pacific Railroad words writ of error
Populære avsnitt
Side 18 - ... not known or used by others in this country, before his invention or discovery thereof, and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof...
Side 544 - If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the constitution, if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law disregarding the constitution or conformably to the constitution disregarding the law, the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.
Side 440 - That they were intended to secure the individual from the arbitrary exercise of the powers of government unrestrained by the established principles of private rights and distributive justice.
Side 445 - All charges of war, and all other expenses that shall be incurred for the common defence or general welfare, and allowed by the United States in Congress assembled, shall be defrayed out of a common treasury, which shall be supplied by the several states, in proportion to the value of all land within each state...
Side 540 - The question of the reasonableness of a rate of charge for transportation by a railroad company, involving as it does the element of reasonableness both as regards the company and as regards the public, is eminently a question for judicial investigation, requiring due process of law for its determination.
Side 584 - The tax is uniform when it operates with the same force and effect in every place where the subject of it is found.
Side 83 - ... Whenever the death of a person shall be caused by wrongful act, neglect, or default, and the act, neglect, or default is such as would, if death had not ensued...
Side 592 - That the power to tax involves the power to destroy; that the power to destroy may defeat and render useless the power to create; that there is a plain repugnance, in conferring on one government a power to control the constitutional measures of another, which other, with respect to those very measures, is declared to be supreme over that which exerts the control are propositions not to be denied.
Side 293 - ... or any other company, body politic or corporate, or any individual person, or to deceive any officer of the association, or any agent appointed to examine the affairs of any such association...
Side 359 - In any case in which the jurisdiction of the court is in issue ; in such cases the question of jurisdiction alone shall be certified to the Supreme Court from the court below for decision.