 Is the man who has paid over money to another's use to dispute the legality of the original consideration? Having once waived the legality, the money shall never come back into his hands again. Can the defendant then in conscience keep the money so paid?...  Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Courts of Common Pleas, and ... - Side 4av Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer Chamber, Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords - 1814 - 658 siderUten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | William David Evans - 1802 - 364 sider
...illegality, the money can never come back to his hands again. Can the defendant then, in confcience, keep the money fo paid? For what purpofe fhould he retain it? To whora is he to pay it over ? Who is entitled to it, but th« plaintiff?" Lord Cjiiel Jufiice Eyre faid,... | |
 | Robert Joseph Pothier - 1806 - 728 sider
...hands again. Can the defendant then, in confcience, keep the money fo paid ? For what purpofe ihould he retain it? To whom is he to pay it over ? Who is entitled to it but the plaintiff?" Lord Chief Juftice Eyre íáí j, " The queftion is, whether he who has received money to another's... | |
 | Henry Keyser - 1850 - 384 sider
...hands again. Can the defendant, then, in conscience keep the money so paid ? For what purpose should he retain it ? To whom is he to pay it over ? Who is entitled to it but the plaintiff?" This case is distinguishable from that of Sullivan v. Greaves, as there the plaintiff could not make... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1862 - 1096 sider
...Justice BULLER asked : " Can the defendant in conscience keep the money so paid ? For what purpose should he retain it ? To whom is he to pay it over ? Who is entitled to it but the plaintiff?" In a note to this case, it is said : "If this money had been paid by the underwriters directly to Tenant,... | |
 | Great Britain. Courts - 1870 - 694 sider
...there asks: " Can the defendant then in conscience keep the money so paid ? For what purpose should he retain it? To whom is he to pay it over, who is entitled to it but the plaintiff?" The answer to these questions in the present case is, that the defendant in conscience might keep the... | |
 | 1885 - 754 sider
...hands again. Can the defendant then in conscience keep the money so paid ? For what purpose should he retain it ? To whom is he to pay it over; who is entitled to it but the plaintiff?" And Eyre, CJ, adds : " The defendant is not like a stakeholder. The question is, whether he who has... | |
 | 1885 - 666 sider
...defendant, then, in conscience, keep the money so paid ? For what purpose should he retain it? To whom is ho to pay it over? Who is entitled to it but the plaintiff? " And Lord Chief Justice Eyre said, " The defendant is not like a stakeholder. The question is whether... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1889 - 994 sider
...Justice Buller said: "Can the defendant in conscience keep the money so paid ? For what purpose should he retain it? To whom is he to pay it over? Who is entitled to it but the plaintiff?" All this is approved as law by this court in Ingram v. Mitckdl, supra, and these utterances of these... | |
| |
