Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

241 U. S.

Cafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (3) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78; Chicago Dock Co. v. Fraley, 228 U. S. 680; Denver v. New York Trust Co., 229 U. S. 123, 143; St. Louis &c. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Norwood, 235 U. S. 350, 366.

No. 366. ST. LOUIS & SUBURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE CITY Of St. Louis; No. 368. UNITED RAILWAYS COMPANY OF ST. LOUIS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE CITY OF ST. Louis;

No. 369. UNITED RAILWAYS COMPANY OF ST. LOUIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS;

No. 370. UNITED RAILWAYS COMPANY OF ST. Louis. PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS;

No. 371. UNITED RAILWAYS COMPANY OF ST. LOUIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, and

No. 372. ST. LOUIS TRANSIT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mr. Henry S. Priest for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Truman P. Young and Mr. Charles H. Daues for the defendant in error.

No. 731. H. E. FILLER, APPELLANT, v. BEN STEELE, SHERIFF, ETC. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Argued April 5, 1916. Decided April 10, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Ex parte Parks, 93 U. S. 18, 21; Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U. S. 101, 105; Frank v. Mangum, 237 U. S. 309, 326; (2) Allen v. Georgia, 166 U. S. 138, 140; Felts v. Murphy, 201 U. S. 123, 129; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78; Jordan v. Massachusetts, 225 U. S. 167; (3) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S.

596, 600; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14. Mr. Ralph D. Hurst and Mr. Thomas H. Greevy for the appellant. Mr. C. Ward Eicher, Mr. George E. Barron and Mr. Cecil E. Heller for the appellee.

No. 460. THE MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE LARABEE FLOUR MILLS COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 10, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction with 10 per centum damages upon the authority of

(1) Roberts v. Cooper, 20 How. 467, 481; Supervisors v. Kennicott, 94 U. S. 498; Clark v. Keith, 106 U. S. 464; Chaffin v. Taylor, 116 U. S. 567, 572; Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant Co., 168 U. S. 451, 456; Illinois v. Illinois Central R. R., 184 U. S. 77, 90-93.

(2) Missouri Pacific Railway v. Larabee Flour Mills Co., 211 U. S. 612; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Larabee Flour Mills Co., 234 U. S. 459. Mr. B. P. Waggener, Mr. W. P. Waggener and Mr. A. E. Crane for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Joseph G. Waters and Mr. Charles Blood Smith for the defendant in error.

No. 863. ALLISON MANCHESTER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF HARTFORD;

No. 864. ALLISON MANCHESTER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF HARTFORD; and

No. 865. EMMA MANCHESTER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OF THE

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

241 U. S.

CITY OF HARTFORD. In error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut. Argued April 12, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112, 160; Clark v. Nash, 198 U. S. 361, 367–369; Hairston v. Danville & Western Ry., 208 U. S. 598; Union Lime Co. v. Chicago & N. W. Ry., 233 U. S. 211, 218-219; O'Neill v. Leamer, 239 U. S. 244, 253; Mount Vernon Cotton Co. v. Alabama Power Co., 240 U. S. 30, 32. Mr. Edward H. Rogers, Mr. Birdsey E. Case and Mr. Edward D. Robbins for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Edward M. Day and Mr. Alvan Waldo Hyde for the defendants in error.

No.

Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF JAMES J. GRIFFIN and GORDON M. PEACOCK, PETITIONERS. Submitted April 10, 1916. Decided April 17, 1916. Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of mandamus denied. Mr. Arthur E. Dowell for the petitioner.

No. 312. MARY MULCARE ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS, ETC., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE CITY OF CHICAGO. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. Argued April 20, 1916. Decided April 24, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22; Cincinnati Street Railway v. Snell, 193 U. S. 30, 35-37. Mr. Hiram T. Gilbert and Mr. John W. Walsh for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Chester E. Cleveland for the defendants in error.

No. 188. KANSAS CITY, MEXICO & ORIENT RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS.

241 U.S.

Opinions Per Curiam, Etc.

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Texas. Argued April 17 and 18, 1916. Decided April 24, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of:

(1) Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147; Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487; Stearns v. Wood, 236 U. S.

75.

(2) Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589; Forbes v. State Council of Virginia, 216 U. S. 396-399; St. Louis & San Francisco Railway v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240.

(3) Henkel v. Cincinnati, 177 U. S. 170; Fullerton v. Texas, 196 U. S. 192, 194; Allen v. Arguimbau, 198 U. S. 149, 156; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 55.

(4) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471. See Pinney v. Nelson, 183 U. S. 144, 147; Abilene National Bank v. Dolley, 228 U. S. 1, 5; Lake Shore & Michigan So. Ry. v. Ohio, 173 U. S. 285, 289, et seq.; Cincinnati, Indianapolis & W. Ry. v. Connersville, 218 U. S. 336; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262, 283 et seq. Mr. Herbert S. Garrett, Mr. Robert Lynn Batts and Mr. John A. Eaton for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Benjamin F. Looney and Mr. Frank L. Snodgrass for the defendant in error.

No. 793. IGNATIUS TIMOTHY TRIBICH LINCOLN, APPELLANT, v. JAMES M. POWER, MARSHAL, ETC. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Argued April 24, 1916. Decided May 1, 1916. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508;

Bryant v. The United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406-407; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523; (2) David Kauffman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580; Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31. Mr. John Neville Boyle and Mr. Addison S. Pratt for the appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles Fox for the appellees.

No. 135, October term, 1914. WILSON CYPRESS COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. ENRIQUE DEL POZO Y MARCOS ET AL. Submitted April 24, 1916. Decided May 1, 1916. Motion for leave to file in the trial court a supplemental bill in the nature of a bill of review denied. Mr. William W. Dewhurst, Mr. Joseph H. Jones, and Mr. John C. Jones for the petitioners. Mr. John C. Cooper in opposition thereto.

No. 324. DANIEL A. LONG, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN E. SHEPARD. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Submitted April 26, 1916. Decided May 8, 1916. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of National Foundry & Pipe Co. v. Oconto Water Works Supply Co., 183 U. S. 216, 237; Vandalia R. R. v. Indiana, 207 U. S. 359, 367; Brinkmeier v. Missouri Pacific Ry., 224 U. S. 268, 270. Mr. Lewis C. Lawson and Mr. C. Dale Wolfe for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in

error.

No.

Original. Ex parte: IN THE MATTER OF ELBERT R. ROBINSON, PETITIONER. Submitted April 28,