Strong as are the precepts of Scripture enjoining obedience to rulers, I apprehend no one will insist that they are binding or applicable in cases where the law of the land interferes with the law of God. On this point Scripture furnishes various illustrations. The prophet Daniel disregarded the decree of Darius, by continuing to pray during the thirty days within which that act of devotion was declared penal. The Three Children of the Captivity chose rather to be cast into a burning fiery furnace than obey the edict of Nebuchadnezzar and worship the golden image. The Apostles Peter and John, when "commanded not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus," answered the Rulers, "Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye; for we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard." And when on a subsequent occasion being again brought before the same tribunal and asked, "Did we not strictly command you that ye should not teach in this name?"-Peter and the other apostles' reply was, "We ought to obey God rather than men. In strict accordance with the instances just quoted, I might refer, if needful, to the example of many of the noble martyrs who, in past ages, sealed their testimony with their blood; and to numberless instances, in the early days of the Society of Friends, when the Conventicle Act declared the ordinary meetings for worship held by Friends to be illegal. But, above all these, we have the injunction of our Saviour Himself, "Render unto Cæsar the things that are Cæsar's, and unto God the things that are God's." Here it is distinctly intimated that there is a province with which Cæsar, the impersonation of earthly power, must not interfere; and if Cæsar oversteps his rightful bounds, and assumes to himself prerogatives which are God's only, he can no longer, in such circumstances, claim that obedience which is his due so long as he keeps within his proper province. Let us see the application of these remarks to the particular case before us. The claimant of the tithes in Lothersdale was George Markham. But not in his personal capacity, as George Markham, could he claim them, for he owned not a rood of the land. It was only in virtue of his appointment as Vicar of Carlton. And whosoever the Vicar of Carlton might happen to be-no matter whether he was a self-denying follower of Christ, or a godless unbeliever living a life of practical denial of the doctrines of the Gospel-him, as Vicar of Carlton, the law regarded as the spiritual instructor and pastor of that district; appointed him as the one special minister of religion for that parish, altogether irrespective of his having, or not having, received from the divine and only true Source a rightful call to the ministry; and, as such, it gave him a claim to take tithes of the occupants of the land, and supported him in enforcing the payment of them. Now, what is this but Cæsar usurping the province of Christ, to whom alone, as Head of His Church, belongs the prerogative of appointing His ministers ? And well might our Lothersdale Friends feel that, in paying tithes to this man, they would be recognising an earthly priesthood, an institution that was for ever abolished by the coming of our Lord-the alone High-Priest of our profession, Jesus Christ the Righteous, who ever liveth to make intercession for us; they would be sanctioning a compulsory payment for the preaching of that Gospel which is directed to be as freely given as it is freely received-they would be virtually assenting to the interference of the State in vital matters of religion; they would, in short, be acknowledging-not Christ, but the head of the civil power, the Sovereign of England, to be head of Christ's Church. TYRUS: ITS GREATNESS AND ITS FALL. (EZEKIEL CHAPS. XXVI., XXVII., XXVIII., AND ISAIAH XXIII.) THE lutes that warbled in thy porphyry halls Are mute, deserted Tyrus! and the voice Of harp or dulcimer no longer calls Thy princes and thy people to rejoice. Oh, who may tell from what a dizzy height The noontide of thy glorious pomp and power. Thou sat'st enthroned a mighty Island Queen, The "crowned" and "crowning city,"-and thy name Went forth encircled by the dazzling sheen Of beauty, riches, majesty, and fame. Thou wert the gaze of nations,-and their kings, To deck thee brought resplendent offerings, Within thy palaces in countless stores The broidered drapery of Egypt shone, And Syria's wealth was gathered on thy shores, The lordly oaks of Bashan tribute paid ;- The fruitful olive was despoiled for thee; From Minnith's hills was brought the golden grain, With regal splendour decked thy stately head. Replenished were thy marts from lands afar, Which shed its lustre o'er the eastern world. But thou art set for ever,-clouds of woe Around thy tarnished name in darkness lower; Thy heart was "lifted" in its hour of pride, Thou mad'st thyself " as God," but Heaven's high King Nor could thy noblest stay the mandate given And ocean-girded Tyrus, what art thou? Oblivion's blasting wing is o'er thee spread. Where is the brightness of thy beauty now? Where are the symbols of thy freedom fled? Thou who wert "glorious amidst the sea," Now have the billowy waters o'er thee rolled; Sad witness of accomplished prophecy ! Well might the nations shudder at thy doom; Yes, and the heart is humbled, as it dwells, Alas for pride! no poor memorial tells Above the dust of prince and potentate The lowly "fisher" rears his dwelling rude; The breeze sweeps o'er thee in its changeful play, But thou art called the "Island Queen |