The Northeastern Reporter, Volum 118
Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio.
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Act Laws action affirmed alleged amended amount answer appellant's Appellate Court appellee application assessment award ballot bill Boston cause charge Chicago circuit court claim complaint contract Cook county corporation damages deceased decree deed defendant in error defendant's demurrer Digests and Indexes district duty election employe employment entitled evidence fact fendant filed held indorsed injury instruction issue Judge judgment jury Key-Numbered Digests land lease liability Mass ment motion Municipal negligence Ohio ordinance overruled Oxford shoes paid parties Patrick Whalen payment person petition plaintiff in error plea premises proceedings question quiet title railroad real estate reason recover reversed rule shoes statute street Suffolk County Superior Court supra Supreme Court Supreme Judicial Court sustained Terre Haute testator testified thereof tiff tion topic and KEY-NUMBER trial court trust verdict warrant writ
Side 365 - Where two parties have made a contract which one of them has broken, the damages which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie, according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself, or such as may reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties, at the time they made the contract, as the probable result of the breach of it.
Side 12 - ... happening by chance, unexpectedly taking place, not according to the usual course of things, or not as expected;' that, if a result is such as follows from ordinary means, voluntarily employed, in a not unusual or unexpected way, it cannot be called a result effected by accidental means; but that if, in the act which precedes the injury, something unforeseen, unexpected, unusual occurs which produces the injury, then the injury has resulted through accidental means.
Side 336 - Signed, sealed, published and declared by the said John Alden, 2nd, as and for his last will and testament, in the presence of us, who, at his request, and in his presence, and in the presence of each other have subscribed our names as witnesses the day and year above written.
Side 83 - Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would be denied the exercise of its constitutional authority and the State, and not the Nation, would be supreme within the national field.
Side 429 - No public utility shall raise any rate, fare, toll, rental or charge or so alter any classification, contract, practice, rule or regulation as to result in an increase in any rate, fare, toll, rental or charge, under any circumstances whatsoever, except upon a showing before the Commission and a finding by the Commission that such increase is justified.
Side 431 - Where the injury for which compensation is payable under this act was caused under circumstances creating a legal liability in some person other than the employer...
Side 112 - At the close of all the evidence defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in his favor.
Side 240 - Where the seller delivers to the buyer a quantity of goods larger than he contracted to sell, the buyer may accept the goods included in the contract and reject the rest, or he may reject the whole.
Side 37 - Every husband, wife, child, parent, guardian, employer or other person, who shall be injured in person or property, or means of support, by any intoxicated .person, or in consequence of the intoxication, habitual or otherwise, of any person, shall have a right of action in his or her own name, severally or jointly, against any person or persons who shall, by selling or giving intoxicating liquors, have caused the intoxication, in whole or in part, of such person or persons...