Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

No. 71-5073. POPE v. NEBRASKA. Appeal from Sup. Ct. Neb. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Judgment vacated insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death penalty imposed, and case remanded for further proceedings. See Stewart v. Massachusetts, ante, p. 845. MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Reported below: 186 Neb. 489, 184 N. W. 2d 395.

No. 70–210. OYEN ET AL. v. WASHINGTON. Appeal from Sup. Ct. Wash. Motion to dispense with printing jurisdictional statement granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Police Department of City of Chicago v. Mosley, ante, p. 92, and Grayned v. City of Rockford, ante, p. 104. Reported below: 78 Wash. 2d 909, 480 P. 2d 766.

Appeal Dismissed

No. 68–5012. HOWARD V. NEVADA. Appeal from Sup. Ct. Nev. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied. Reported below: 84 Nev. 599, 446 P. 2d 163.

Certiorari GrantedVacated and Remanded
In each of the following cases (beginning with No. 68–

5001 on this page and extending through No. 71–6592
on p. 940), the motion for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and certiorari are granted. The judg-
ment is vacated insofar as it leaves undisturbed the
death penalty imposed, and the case is remanded for
further proceedings. See Stewart v. Massachusetts,

ante, p. 845. No. 68–5001. MARKS v. LOUISIANA. Sup. Ct. La. Reported below: 252 La. 277, 211 So. 2d 261.

No. 68–5002. McCANTS V. ALABAMA. Sup. Ct. Ala. Reported below: 282 Ala. 397, 211 So. 2d 877.

[blocks in formation]

RECTOR

No. 68-5003. IN RE REYNOLDS ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir. Reported below: 397 F. 2d 131.

No. 68–5004. YATES v. Cook, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT. C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 402 F. 2d 113.

No. 68–5005. SIMs v. EYMAN, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT. C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 405 F. 2d 439. No. 68–5006. WRIGHT v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DI

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Reported below: 422 S. W. 2d 184.

No. 68–5008. MILLER v. MARYLAND. Ct. App. Md. Reported below: 251 Md. 362, 247 A. 2d 530.

No. 68–5010. WILLIAMS v. LOUISIANA. Sup. Ct. La. Reported below: 252 La. 1023, 215 So. 2d 799.

No. 68–5011. HUBBARD V. ALABAMA. Sup. Ct. Ala. Reported below: 283 Ala. 183, 215 So. 2d 261.

No. 68–5013. SCOLERI V. PENNSYLVANIA. Sup. Ct. Pa. Reported below: 432 Pa. 571, 248 A. 2d 295.

No. 68–5015. JANOVIC v. EYMAN, WARDEN. C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 406 F. 2d 314.

No. 68–5016. SMITH ET AL. v. WASHINGTON. Sup. Ct. Wash. Reported below: 74 Wash. 2d 744, 446 P. 2d 571.

No. 68-5018. BILLINGSLEY V. NEW JERSEY ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir. Reported below: 408 F. 2d 1181.

No. 68-5019. MORFORD V. HOCKER, WARDEN. Sup. Ct. Nev.

No. 68–5022. KRUCHTEN V. EYMAN, WARDEN. C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 406 F. 2d 304.

No. 68–5023. SMITH v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Reported below: 437 S. W. 2d 835.

No. 68–5024. MCALLISTER v. LOUISIANA. Sup. Ct. La. Reported below: 253 La. 382, 218 So. 2d 305.

No. 69–2. KOONCE V. OKLAHOMA. Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Reported below: 456 P. 2d 549.

[blocks in formation]

No. 69–3. PARK v. GEORGIA. Sup. Ct. Ga. Reported below: 225 Ga. 618, 170 S. E. 2d 687.

No. 69–5004. HURST v. ILLINOIS ET AL. Sup. Ct. Ill. Reported below: 42 Ill. 2d 217, 247 N. E. 2d 614.

No. 69–5005. LOKOS v. ALABAMA. Sup. Ct. Ala. Reported below: 284 Ala. 53, 221 So. 2d 689. No. 69–5006. SULLIVAN v. GEORGIA.

GIA. Sup. Ct. Ga. Reported below: 225 Ga. 301, 168 S. E. 2d 133.

No. 69–5007. FESMIRE V. OKLAHOMA. Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Reported below: 456 P. 2d 573.

No. 69–5008. DUISEN V. MISSOURI. Sup. Ct. Mo. Reported below: 441 S. W. 2d 688.

No. 69–5010. THOMAS V. FLORIDA. Sup. Ct. Fla. Reported below: 223 So. 2d 318.

No. 69–5011. WALKER V. NEVADA. Sup. Ct. Nev. Reported below: 85 Nev. 337, 455 P. 2d 34.

No. 69–5013. MEFFORD v. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY. C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 413 F. 2d 439.

No. 69–5014. Davis v. CONNECTICUT. Sup. Ct. Conn. Reported below: 158 Conn. 341, 260 A. 2d 587.

No. 69–5015. MANOR v. GEORGIA. Sup. Ct. Ga. Reported below: 225 Ga. 538, 170 S. E. 2d 290.

No. 69–5018. EATON v. OHIO. Sup. Ct. Ohio. Reported below: 19 Ohio St. 2d 145, 249 N. E. 2d 897.

No. 69–5023. IRVING v. MISSISSIPPI. Sup. Ct. Miss. Reported below: 228 So. 2d 266.

No. 69–5024. PARAMORE v. FLORIDA. Sup. Ct. Fla. Reported below: 229 So. 2d 855.

No. 69–5025. KELBACH ET AL. V. UTAH. Sup. Ct. Utah. Reported below: 23 Utah 2d 231, 461 P. 2d 297.

No. 69–5027. CUMMINGS v. GEORGIA. Sup. Ct. Ga. Reported below: 226 Ga. 46, 172 S. E. 2d 395.

No. 69–5028. WILLIAMS v. SLAYTON, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT. Sup. Ct. Va.

No. 69–5029. EUBANKS v. Ohio. Sup. Ct. Ohio.

[blocks in formation]

RECTOR.

No. 69–5032. ARKWRIGHT v. GEORGIA. Sup. Ct. Ga. Reported below: 226 Ga. 192, 173 S. E. 2d 179.

No. 69–5033. ATKINSON v. SOUTH CAROLINA. Sup. Ct. S. C. Reported below: 253 S. C. 531, 172 S. E. 2d 111.

No. 69–5034. CARTER v. OHIO. Sup. Ct. Ohio. Reported below: 21 Ohio St. 2d 212, 256 N. E. 2d 714.

No. 69–5036. HUBBARD V. ALABAMA. Sup. Ct. Ala. Reported below: 285 Ala. 212, 231 So. 2d 86.

No. 69–5038. KEATON v. OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Reported below: 19 Ohio App. 2d 254, 250 N. E. 2d 901.

No. 69–5039. LEE, AKA KING v. GEORGIA. Sup. Ct. Ga. Reported below: 226 Ga. 162, 173 S. E. 2d 209. No. 69–5043. HUFFMAN v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DI

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Reported below: 450 S. W. 2d 858.

No. 69–5044. SWAIN V. ALABAMA. Sup. Ct. Ala. Reported below: 285 Ala. 292, 231 So. 2d 737.

No. 69–5045. THACKER V. GEORGIA. Sup. Ct. Ga. Reported below: 226 Ga. 170, 173 S. E. 2d 186.

No. 69–5047. DULING v. OHIO. Sup. Ct. Ohio. Reported below: 21 Ohio St. 2à 13, 254 N. E. 2d 670.

No. 69–5048. LASKEY v. OHIO. Sup. Ct. Ohio. Reported below: 21 Ohio St. 2d 187, 257 N. E. 2d 65.

No. 69-5049. WILLIAMS v. GEORGIA. Sup. Ct. Ga. Reported below: 226 Ga. 140, 173 S. E. 2d 182.

No. 70–3. WALKER V. GEORGIA. Sup. Ct. Ga. Reported below: 226 Ga. 292, 174 S. E. 2d 440.

No. 70–5. LIMONE ET AL. v. MASSACHUSETTS. Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Reported below: 357 Mass. 356, 259 N. E. 2d 195.

No. 71-1139. LIMONE ET AL. V. MASSACHUSETTS. Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Reported below: Mass. 276 N. E. 2d 698.

No. 70–5001. POLAND V. LOUISIANA. Sup. Ct. La. Reported below: 255 La. 746, 232 So. 2d 499.

[blocks in formation]

No. 70–5003. CAPLER v. MISSISSIPPI. Sup. Ct. Miss. Reported below: 237 So. 2d 445.

No. 70–5006. HAMBY ET AL. V. NORTH CAROLINA. Sup. Ct. N. C. Reported below: 276 N. C. 674, 174 S. E. 2d 385.

No. 70–5008. DAVID, AKA Davis v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Reported below: 453 S. W. 2d 172.

No. 70–5011. THAMES V. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Reported below: 453 S. W. 2d 495.

No. 70–5016. STRONG v. LOUISIANA. Sup. Ct. La. Reported below: 256 La. 455, 236 So. 2d 798.

No. 70–5017. FULLER V. SOUTH CAROLINA. Sup. Ct. S. C. Reported below: 254 S. C. 260, 174 S. E. 2d 774.

No. 70–5018. MILLER V. NORTH CAROLINA. Sup. Ct. N. C. Reported below: 276 N. C. 681, 174 S. E. 2d 481.

No. 70–5019. Fog v. SLAYTON, PENITENTIARY SuPERINTENDENT. Sup. Ct. Va. Reported below: See 208 Va. 541, 159 S. E. 2d 616.

No. 70–5022. TEA V. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Reported below: 453 S. W. 2d 179.

No. 70–5023. DOUGLAS ET AL. v. LOUISIANA. Sup. Ct. La. Reported below: 256 La. 572, 237 So. 2d 382.

No. 70–5027. ALVAREZ V. NEBRASKA. Sup. Ct. Neb. Reported below: 185 Neb. 557, 177 N. W. 2d 591.

No. 70–5031. SELLARS V. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 430 F. 2d 1150.

No. 70–5034. TYLER v. WASHINGTON. Sup. Ct. Wash. Reported below: 77 Wash. 2d 726, 466 P. 2d 120.

No. 70–5043. HERRON V. TENNESSEE. Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Reported below: 3 Tenn. Cr. App. 39, 456 S. W. 2d 873.

No. 70–5044. JACKSON V. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 428 F. 2d 1054.

No. 70–5046. JOHNSON v. MARYLAND. Ct. App. Md. Reported below: 258 Md. 597, 267 A. 2d 152.

« ForrigeFortsett »