JURISDICTION. See also Appeals, 1; Constitutional Law, VII, 1.
District Court "decision or judgment setting aside, or dismissing"
the indictment-Direct appeal.-This Court has jurisdiction under
18 U. S. C. § 3731 (1964 ed., Supp. V) to hear the appeal, since
the District Court's order was based upon its determination of the
constitutional invalidity of 18 U. S. C. §§ 201 (c) (1) and 201 (g)
on the facts as alleged in the indictment. United States v. Brew-
ster, p. 501.
"JUST CAUSE" SHOWN. See Grand Juries, 1.
JUSTICIABILITY. See also Constitutional Law, III, 3.
First Amendment-Freedom of association-Civil disorders-
Army's compilation of data on civilian political activities.—Civilians'
claim that their First Amendment rights are chilled, due to the
mere existence of the data-gathering system, does not constitute a
justiciable controversy on the basis of the record in this case,
disclosing as it does no showing of objective harm or threat of
specific future harm. Laird v. Tatum, p. 1.
KALEIDOSCOPE. See Constitutional Law, III, 7.
KENTUCKY. See Constitutional Law, III, 8; Grand Juries, 4.
KIDNAPING. See Grand Juries, 1.
LABOR DISPUTES. See Constitutional Law, III, 5–6.
LAS VEGAS. See Grand Juries, 1.
LAWFUL POLITICAL ACTIVITY. See Constitutional Law, III,
3; Justiciability.
LEFT-WING STUDENTS. See Constitutional Law, III, 2, 4;
IV, 2.
LEGAL CONSTRAINTS. See Taxes, 1-3.
LEGALITY OF SEARCH. See Constitutional Law, V; Evi-
dence, 3.
LEGAL STANDARDS. See Administrative Procedure, 1-5;
Interstate Commerce Commission, 1-5; Judicial Review, 2-6.
LEGISLATIVE ACTS. See Appeals, 1-3; Constitutional Law,
VII, 1-6; Grand Juries, 2-3, 5; Jurisdiction.
LEGISLATIVE INDEPENDENCE. See Appeals, 1; Constitu-
tional Law, VII, 1; Jurisdiction.
LIBERTY OF PAROLEES. See Constitutional Law, I, 1-2, 4;
Paroles, 1-3.
LINE-HAUL CARRIERS. See Administrative Procedure, 1-5;
Interstate Commerce Commission, 1-5; Judicial Review, 2-6.
LOCAL CHAPTERS. See Constitutional Law, III, 7.
LOUISVILLE. See Constitutional Law, III, 8; Grand Juries, 4.
MANAGEMENT POWERS. See Taxes, 1-3.
MANDATORY SENTENCES. See Constitutional Law, II, 2;
Criminal Law, 1.
MARIHUANA. See Constitutional Law, III, 8; Grand Juries, 4.
MARKET SHARES. See Administrative Procedure, 1-5; Inter-
state Commerce Commission, 1-5; Judicial Review, 2-6.
MARXIST THEORETICIAN. See Constitutional Law, III, 1;
Immigration and Nationality Act; Judicial Review, 1.
MASSACHUSETTS.
See Constitutional Law, III, 8; Grand
MATERIALITY. See Constitutional Law, I, 3; II, 1; Criminal
Law, 2-4; Evidence, 1-2; Procedure, 1.
MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. See Appeals, 1-3; Constitutional
Law, VII, 1-6; Grand Juries, 2-3, 5; Jurisdiction.
MERGERS. See Administrative Procedure, 1-5; Interstate Com-
merce Commission, 1-5; Judicial Review, 2-6.
MILWAUKEE RAILROAD. See Administrative Procedure, 1-5;
Interstate Commerce Commission, 1-5; Judicial Review, 2-6.
MINORITY STOCKHOLDERS. See Taxes, 1-3.
MISCONDUCT OF MEMBERS. See Appeals, 1; Constitutional
Law, VII, 1; Jurisdiction.
MISTAKEN IDENTITY. See Constitutional Law, I, 3; II, 1;
Criminal Law, 2-4; Evidence, 1-2; Procedure, 1.
MOOTNESS. See also Constitutional Law, VI; Witnesses.
Second-offender sentence in New York based on previous Ten-
nessee felony conviction-Tennessee conviction allegedly unconstitu-
tional-Previous Texas conviction still on appeal.-New York State's
resentencing of respondent did not moot the instant case since his
appeal involving the validity of still another conviction, in Texas,
is still in the New York state courts and therefore New York State
has a present interest in the availability of the Tennessee conviction.
as a predicate for the stiffer punishment. Mancusi v. Stubbs, p. 204.
MORPHINE. See Confessions; Constitutional Law, IV, 1.
MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE. See Constitutional Law, I, 3; II,
1; Criminal Law, 2-4; Evidence, 1-2; Procedure, 1.
MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS. See Constitutional Law, V; Evi-
dence, 3.
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA. See Appeals, 2-3; Consti-
tutional Law, III, 8; VII, 2-6; Grand Juries, 2-5.
MOTIVATION FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTS. See Appeals, 1;
Constitutional Law, VII, 1; Jurisdiction.
MOTIVES OF SENATORS. See Appeals, 2-3; Constitutional
Law, VII, 2-6; Grand Juries, 2-3, 5.
MUNICIPALITIES. See Constitutional Law, III, 5-6.
MURDER. See Constitutional Law, II, 2; Criminal Law, 1.
MURDER WEAPONS. See Constitutional Law, I, 3; II, 1; Crim-
inal Law, 2-4; Evidence, 1-2; Procedure, 1.
NATIONAL SDS. See Constitutional Law, III, 2, 4; IV, 2.
NEGRO STUDENTS. See Constitutional Law, III, 5-6.
"NEUTRAL AND DETACHED" HEARING BODY. See Con-
stitutional Law, I, 1-2, 4; Paroles, 1-3.
NEVADA. See Grand Juries, 1.
Constitutional Law, III, 8; Grand
NEWS ARTICLES. See Constitutional Law, III, 7.
NEWSMAN'S PRIVILEGE. See Constitutional Law, III, 8;
Grand Juries, 4.
NEWSPAPER REPORTERS. See Constitutional Law, III, 8;
Grand Juries, 4.
NEW YORK. See Constitutional Law, VI; Mootness; Witnesses.
NEW YORK TIMES. See Constitutional Law, III, 8; Grand
Juries, 4.
NONIMMIGRATION VISAS. See Constitutional Law, III, 1;
Immigration and Nationality Act; Judicial Review, 1.
NONRECOGNITION OF STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS.
Constitutional Law, III, 2, 4; IV, 2.
NONRETENTION. See Constitutional Law, III, 9; Procedure, 2.
NONTENURED TEACHERS. See Constitutional Law, I, 5; III,
9; Procedure, 2-3.
NORTHERN LINES MERGER. See Administrative Procedure,
1-5; Interstate Commerce Commission, 1-5; Judicial Review,
2-6.
NOTICE. See Constitutional Law, I, 1-2, 4; Paroles, 1-3.
OBJECTIVE HARM. See Constitutional Law, III, 3;
OBSCENITY. See Constitutional Law, III, 7.
ODESSA JUNIOR COLLEGE. See Constitutional Law, III, 9;
Procedure, 2.
OFFICIAL ACTS. See Appeals, 1; Constitutional Law, VII, 1;
OMNIBUS CRIME CONTROL AND SAFE STREETS ACT. See
Grand Juries, 1.
ONE-YEAR CONTRACTS. See Constitutional Law, III, 9; Pro-
cedure, 2.
OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. See Constitutional Law, I,
1-2; 4; Paroles, 1-3.
See Confessions; Constitutional Law,
ORDINANCES. See Constitutional Law, III, 5-6.
OREGON. See Administrative Procedure, 1-5; Interstate Com-
merce Commission, 1-5; Judicial Review, 2-6.
ORGANIZED CRIME CONTROL ACT. See Grand Juries.
OVERBREADTH. See Constitutional Law, III, 3,
III, 3, 5-6;
Justiciability.
PAROLES. See also Constitutional Law, I, 1-2, 4.
1. Arrest for parole violation-Revocation of parole.-Though
parole revocation does not call for the full panoply of rights due
a defendant in a criminal proceeding, a parolee's liberty involves
significant values within the protection of the Due Process Clause
of the Fourteenth Amendment, and termination of that liberty
requires an informal hearing to give assurance that the finding of
a parole violation is based on verified facts to support the revoca-
tion. Morrissey v. Brewer, p. 471.
2. Determination whether parole condition was violated.-Due
process requires a reasonably prompt informal inquiry conducted
by an impartial hearing officer near the place of the alleged parole
violation to determine if there is reasonable ground to believe that
the arrested parolee has violated a parole condition. The parolee
should receive prior notice of the inquiry, its purpose, and the
alleged violations. The parolee may present relevant information
and (absent security considerations) question adverse informants.
The hearing officer shall digest the evidence on probable cause and
state the reasons for holding the parolee for the parole board's
decision. Morrissey v. Brewer, p. 471.
3. Parolee arrested for parole violation-Hearing on proposed
revocation of parole.-At the revocation hearing, which must be
conducted reasonably soon after the parolee's arrest, minimum due
process requirements are: (a) written notice of the claimed viola-
tions of parole; (b) disclosure to the parolee of evidence against
him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present wit-
nesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and
cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifi-
cally finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a "neutral
and detached" hearing body such as a traditional parole board,
members of which need not be judicial officers or lawyers; and
(f) a written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied
on and reasons for revoking parole. Morrissey v. Brewer, p. 471.
PEACEFUL PICKETING. See Constitutional Law, III, 5-6.
PENALTIES. See Constitutional Law, II, 2; Criminal Law, 1.
PENINSULA TERMINAL CO. See Administrative Procedure,
1-5; Interstate Commerce Commission, 1-5; Judicial Review,
2-6.
PENITENTIARIES. See Constitutional Law, I, 1-2, 4; Paroles,
PENNSYLVANIA. See Grand Juries, 1.
PENTAGON PAPERS. See Appeals, 2-3; Constitutional Law,
VII, 2-6; Grand Juries, 2-3, 5.
PERFORMANCE OF OFFICIAL ACTS. See Appeals, 1; Con-
stitutional Law, VII, 1.
PERSONAL-ENTRY RIGHT. See Constitutional Law, III, 1;
Immigration and Nationality Act; Judicial Review, 1.
PETITIONS FOR INCLUSION. See Administrative Procedure,
1-5; Interstate Commerce Commission, 1-5; Judicial Review,
2-6.
PHOTOGRAPHS. See Constitutional Law, III, 7.
|