And it is further ordered that the several aforesaid sums be paid out of the Registry, for the use and benefit of the respective Libellants and Petitioners, to their respective Proctors of record.
2. If a vessel is let on a contract of
1. The Admiralty has no jurisdic- affreightment, by charter party, the tion over matters of account, merely owners will not be held responsible for as accounts, although they may arise a loss occasioned by the violence of exclusively out of maritime transac- the elements, although the dangers of tions. It can take cognizance of ac. the seas are not expressly excepted by Ibid. counts only as incidental to other the charter party. matters over which it has jurisdiction. 3. But if they are chargeable with Davis v. Child, 71 any neglect or fault without which the loss would not have happened, they will be liable.
2. By the statute of limitations in Maine, in an action on a mutual and open account current, the right of ac- 4. Every engagement to perform a tion for the whole balance is deemed future act is subject to an implied con- to have accrued at the time of the last dition, that the performance of it is item proved in the account. But if a not rendered impossible by an acci party sleeps on a demand without en- dent of major force, or a fortuitous tering it on his account, until the pe- event. The Eliza, 316 riod of limitations is elapsed, he cannot 5. An unusual difficulty in obtain- extract it from the statute by after- ing a master and crew to navigate a wards entering it upon his account. vessel, is not one of those events that Ex parte, Storer, 294 will ordinarily excuse an owner from See APPROPRIATION OF PAYMENTS. performing a contract of affreightment for the conveyance of goods. See JURISDICTION, 7.
Where a creditor has a debt due to him on a single contract or obligation, he cannot divide it by assigning part 1. Money paid by an agent under a to one and part to another, so as to mistake as to the legal obligation of enable each assignee to maintain a his principal, may, it seems be re- separate action, without the assent of covered back by the principal in an the debtor. action for money had and received.
The Hull of a New Ship, 199
United States v. Bartlett, 9
2. The power of an agent may be revoked at any time by the principal without notice; but if the agent in the prosecution of the business of his principal has fairly and in good faith, 1. In every contract of affreight before notice of the revocation of his ment, whether by charter party or bill powers, entered into any engage. of lading, the ship is, by the marine ments, or come under any liabilities, law, hypothecated to the shipper for the principal will be bound to indem any damage his goods may sustain nify him. from the insufficiency of the vessel, or the fault of the master or crew.
United States v. Jarvis, 274
3. So an agent, after accepting an The Brig Casco, 184 agency, cannot renounce it at pleasure,
without notice or good cause, but on ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT the condition of rendering himself re- sponsible for any loss which may
thereby be sustained by his principal. ASSIGNEE IN BANKRUPTCY.
Under the bankrupt law, assignees
4. A contract, by which a right of pre-emtion is given to a party for a are chargeable with interest on all certain time at a fixed price, on a money which they have collected if bona fide expectation that he may be. not paid into the registry within sixty come a purchaser, will not constitute days after it is received.
him an agent of the vendor, although he sells his interest in the contract at an advanced price before the expira- tion of the term.
In re Thorp, 290 See JURISDICTION, 17, 18, 19 EVIDENCE.
ASSIGNMENT OF DEBT.
1. When a creditor transfers his
Mason v. Crosby, 303 5. But if the right of pre-emption is given, not with an expectation that the party will become a purchaser, debt, the assignment carries with it all the accessroy obligations, as pawns, but solely for the purpose of enabling him to make sale of the thing, and to hypothecations, or sureties, by which get his compensation in the advanced the debt is secured. price, this will render him the agent
of the owner, and the consequences of 2. But where a creditor has a debt agency will follow so as to render the due to him on a single contract or ob- owner responsible for his acts. Ibid. ligation, he cannot divide it by assign-
See NAVY AGENT. JURISDICTION, 17, 19.
APPROPRIATION OF PAYMENTS. 1. When a debtor, owing another several sums and on various accounts, makes a payment, he may appropriate the payment to which debt he pleases. If he does not make the appropriation, the creditor may.
United States v. Bradbury, 146
ing part to one and part to another, so as to enable each assignee to main- tain a separate action without the assent of the debtor.
See HUSBAND AND WIFE. PARTNERSHIP, 8, 9, 10. JURISDICTION, 19, 20, 21. EVIDENCE, 2.
2. If neither party makes an ap- BILL OF LADING. propriation at the time of payment, the law intervenes and makes the ap- propriation.
3. In open and running accounts, the law appropriates a partial pay. ment to extinguish the oldest item in the account. Ibid.
BILL OF EXCHANGE. See SALVAGE, 7.
4. When an appropriation is made BOND, by a receipt, prima facie it is the creditor who makes it, because the language is his.
PARTNERSHIP 3, 4, 5, 6. •
FOR DEED OF LAND. See AGENCY, 4, 5.
5. By the Roman law, when no appropriation of a payment is made by either party, the law applies it to the extinguishment of that debt which BUILDER OF VESSEL. will be most beneficial to the debtor. See HYPOTHECATION, 2, 3.
8. A vessel ought not to be moored and lie in the channel, or entrance to a port, except in cases of necessity. If anchored there from necessity she ought not to remain there longer than the necessity continues. If she does, and a collision takes place with a vessel entering the harbor, she will be considered in fault. Ibid
9. A vessel lying in the channel of a port, from necessity, is bound in the night time to show a light. Ibid.
10. In cases of collision, a fault of one vessel will not excuse any want of care, diligence, and skill in another, so as to exempt her from sharing the loss and damage. Ibid.
COMMON CARRIER.
1. The owners of a steamboat,
1. Whether a vessel, when engaged in an illegal employment, can main- tain an action for an injury received employed in carrying passengers and from another vessel by collision- merchandise between port and port, Quære?
The Leopard, 193 are responsible to shippers of goods, as common carriers. The Huntress, 82 2. Common carriers must, at their
3. It is the duty of the owner of
2. When there is danger of collis- ion between two vessels, the one that is sailing before the wind, or with a peril, deliver goods which they carry fair wind, must give way for one that to the right persons, and if they make is close hauled on the wind. Ibid. a wrong delivery, they will be respon- 3. A vessel moved by steam is con- by occasioned. sible for any loss which may be there- sidered as always sailing with a fair wind, and must, in all cases, give way for a vessel moved by the wind. Ibid. goods to have them properly marked, 4. When a collision takes place be- his servants, to have them entered in and to present them to the carrier or tween a vessel under sail and one at their books; and if he neglects to do anchor, the prima facie presumption, if it, and there is a misdelivery and loss there be any fault, is that it is on in consequence, without any fault of the vessel under sail. The Scioto, 359 the carrier, he must bear the loss. 5. A vessel entering a harbor is bound to keep the most vigilant watch 4. But the carrier is not discharged to avoid collision with other vessels in from all responsibility as to the deliv- motion or lying at anchor; and if in ery by such neglect, but if there is a the night time, she ought to have her wrong delivery or a loss through any
whole crew on deck on the look out.
want of reasonable caution on the part of the carrier or his servants, be will be responsible. Ibid.
6. When a collision takes place by the fault of one of the vessels, she is responsible for all the damage. Ibid. CONDITION (IMPLIED).
7. But if it happens without fault
in either party, or if there was fault
See AFFREIGHTMENTS, 4. 5.
and it cannot be ascertained which CONDITION PRECEDENT.
vessel was in fault, or if both were in fault, then the damage and loss are
divided between them in equal shares. CONSIGNMENT.
1. The preamble of a cannot control the enacting part of the law when the meaning is clear; but when the language is ambiguous and may admit a larger or more restricted interpretation, the pream- ble may be referred to, to determine which sense was intended by the Legislature. The reason of this rule of interpretation is, that it states the reasons and objects of the law.
United States v. Webster 39
2. If the reasons and objects of the law are made known by any other document, equally authentic and certain, this may, for the same rea- son, he referred to, to aid in the in- terpretation of doubtful or ambigu- ous language in the law. Ibid.
3. In the construction of tempora. ry statutes, as annual appropriation acts, the presumption is that any special provisions of a general char- acter, contained in such acts, are in- tended to be restricted in their oper- ation to the subject matter of the act; and they are not to be con- strued to be permanent regulations, unless the intention of making them so is clearly expressed.
United States v. Jarvis, 274
1. In all engagements formed in- ter absentes by letters or messengers, an offer by one party is made, in law, at the time when it is received by the other. Before it is received it may be revoked. So the revoca. tion, in law, is made when that is received, and has no legal existence before. If the party, to whom the offer is made, accepts and acts on the offer, the engagement will be binding on both parties, though be- fore it is accepted another letter or messenger may have been despatch- ed to revoke it. The Palo Alto, 344
4. The meaning of the contract- ing parties is generally to be collect- ed from the words in which the con- tract is expressed. Ibid.
5. But when the language is am- biguous, or the words have a popu- lar sense, more or less extensive than that which they naturally import, we may look beyond the words to ascer- tain the intent of the parties. Ibid.
6. When the meaning of the lan- guage is obscure or uncertain, the construction is to be against the par- ty in whose words it is expressed. This general rule of interpretation applies in all its force, against the owners, in the construction of ship- ping articles. Ibid.
7. When, in the shipping articles of an English vessel, the voyage was described to be from Liverpool to Savannah, and any port or ports of the United States, of the West Indies, and of British North America, the term of service not to exceed twelve months, it was held that the voyage intended was confined to the ports on the eastern shore of the continent, and that the articles did not authorize a voyage to San Fran- cisco, on the north-west coast. Ibid. See JURISDICTION, 7.
SEAMEN'S WAGES, 6, 21. AFFREIGHTMENt, 1, 4. HYPOTHECATION, 1.
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, 1, 2. AGENCY, 4.
COVENANT NOT TO SUE. See EQUITY, 7.
« ForrigeFortsett » |