On the question that the House do agree to the sixth of the said articles of impeachment,

Yeas...
Nays

The yeas and nays being demanded by one-fifth of the members present,

Those who voted in the affirmative, are,

On the question that the House do agree to the seventh of the said articles of im~ peachment,

Yeas
Nays.

The yeas and nays being demanded by one-fifth of the members present,

Those who voted in the affirmative, are,

The eighth and last of the said articles of impeachment being again read at the Clerk's table,

A division of the question, on the same, was called for,

And on the question, that the House do agree to the first member of the said eighth article, in the words following, to wit:

ARTICLE VIII. And whereas mutual respect and confidence betweer. the Govern ment of the United States and those of the individual States, and between the People and those Governments, respectively, are highly conducive to that public harmony, without which there can be no public happiness, yet the said Samuel Chase, disre garding the duties and dignity of his judicial character, did, at a Circuit Court, for the District of Maryland, held at Baltimore, in the month of May, one thousand eight hundred and three, pervert his official right and duty to address the grand jury then and there assembled, on the matters coming within the province of the said jury, for the purpose of delivering to the said grand jury, an intemperate and inflammatory political harangue, with intent to excite the fears and resentment of the said grand jury, and of the good People of Maryland against their State Government and Constitution, a conduct highly censurable in any, but peculiarly indecent and unbecoming in a judge of the Supreme Court of the United States: and, moreover, that the said Samuel Chase, then, and there, under pretence of exercising his judicial right to address the said grand jury, as aforesaid, did, in a manner highly unwarrantable, endeavor to excite the odium of the said grand jury, and of the good People of Maryland, against the Government of the United States, by delivering opinions, which, even if the judicial authority were competent to their expression, on a suitable occasion and in a proper manner, were at that time, and as delivered by him, highly indecent, extra-judicial, and tending to prostitute the high judicial character with which he was invested, to the low purpose of an electioneering partizan.”

Yeas

It was resolved in the affirmative, 2 Nays

74,

39.

The yeas and nays being demanded by one-fifth of the members present,

Those who voted in the affirmative, are,

Andrew Gregg,
Josiah Hasbrouck,
Joseph Heister,

James Holland,
David Holmes,
John G. Jackson,
Nehemiah Knight,
Simon Larned,
Michael Leib,
John B. C. Lucas,
Matthew Lyon,
Andrew McCord,
William McCreery,
David Meriwether,
Nicholas R. Moore,
Thomas Moore,
Jeremiah Morrow,
Roger Nelson,
Anthony New,
Thomas Newton, jun.
Joseph H. Nicholson,
Gideon Olin,

Beriah Palmer,

John Patterson,

John Randolph,

Those who voted in the negative, are,

Willis Alston, jun.
Simeon Baldwin,
Silas Betton,

William Blackledge,
John Campbell,
William Chamberlin,
Martin Chittenden,
Clifton Claggett,
Manasseh Cutler,
Samuel W. Dana,
John Davenport,
Thomas Dwight,
John B. Earle,
James Elliot,

Calvin Goddard,

Thomas Griffin,

Gaylord Griswold,

Roger Griswold,

Seth Hastings,

David Hough,

Thomas M. Randolph,

John Rea, of Pennsylvania,
John Rhea, of Tennessee,
Samuel Riker,

Cæsar A. Rodney,
Erastus Root,

Thomas Sammons,
Thomas Sandford,
Ebenezer Seaver,
James Sloan,
John Smilie,
Henry Southard,
Richard Stanford,
Joseph Stanton,
John Stewart,
David Thomas,
Philip R. Thompson,
Abram Trigg,
Isaac Van Horne,
Joseph B. Varnum,
John Whitehill,
Alexander Wilson,
Richard Winn,
Joseph Winston,
Thomas Wynns.

Samuel Hunt,
William Kennedy,
Joseph Lewis, jun.

Henry W. Livingston,

Nahum Mitchell,

James Mott,
Thomas Plater,

Samuel D. Purviance,
John Cotton Smith,
John Smith,
William Stedman,
James Stephenson,
Samuel Taggart,
Benjamin Tallmage,
Samuel Tenney,

Samuel Thatcher,

George Tibbits,

Peleg Wadsworth,
Marmaduke Williams.

On the question that the House do agree to the second member of the said eighth article, as contained in the last clause of the report made by the select committee, in the words following, to wit:

"And the House of Representatives, by protestation, saving to themselves the liberty of exhibiting, at any time hereafter, any farther articles, or other accusation, or impeachment, against the said Samuel Chase, and also of replying to his answers which he shall make unto the said articles, or any of them, and of offering proof to all and every the aforesaid articles, and to all and every other articles, impeachment, or accusation, which shall be exhibited by them, as the case shall require, do demand that the said Samuel Chase may be put to answer the said crimes and misdemeanors; and that such proceedings, examinations, trials, and judgments may be thereupon had and given as are agreeable to law and justice."

It was resolved in the affirmative,

Yeas
Nays.

....

78,
32.

The yeas and nays being demanded by one-fifth of the members present,

And then the main question being taken that the House do concur with the select committee in their agreement to the said articles of impeachment, as originally proposed, and hereinbefore recited,

On a motion made and seconded that the House do come to the following resolution :