Televised College Football: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, Second Session, July 31, 1984, Volum 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985 - 154 sider |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
academic standards antitrust laws appear areas attendance Big Eight Conference Big Ten Conference broadcast cable carrier CFA members Chairman championship coaches college basketball College Football Association college football games college football television Commercial competition Court of Appeals Division I-A Division II dollars enforcement ESPN exposure football playing football powers football programs FOOTBALL TELEVISION PLAN going HALLOCK I-AA independent stations injunction intercollegiate athletics Joe Paterno Judge Burciaga Kansas major marketplace MARKEY member institutions membership million National Collegiate Athletic NATIONAL FOOTBALL TELEVISION NBC Sports NCAA control NCAA National Series NCAA plan NCAA television plan NCAA's negotiate NEINAS networks number of games Oklahoma opportunity Pac Ten participate Paterno percent Pilson problems question recruiting regional response restrictions rights fees rules schedule schools sion SLATTERY Southwestern Athletic Conference student athletes subcommittee teams telecast television package television rights Thank tions TONER University of Georgia viewers violation WORMINGTON WUSSLER
Populære avsnitt
Side 62 - ... is binding only upon the parties to the action, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and upon those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal service or otherwise.
Side 11 - The competitive athletic programs of the colleges are designed to be a vital part of the educational system. A basic purpose of this Association is to maintain intercollegiate athletics as an integral part of the educational program and the athlete as an integral part of the student body, and, by so doing, retain a clear line of demarcation between college athletics and professional sports.
Side 29 - In either event, the purpose of the analysis is to form a judgment about the competitive significance of the restraint; it is not to decide whether a policy favoring competition is in the public interest, or in the interest of the members of an industry.
Side 61 - Every order granting an injunction and every restraining order shall set forth the reasons for its issuance; shall be specific in terms; shall describe in reasonable detail and not by reference to the complaint or other document, the act RUBIN v.
Side 58 - ... (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work; (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending...
Side 16 - ... documented by extensive research, and as a consequence there was instituted in 1951 a series of television control plans developed by, approved by, and operative upon the Association's institutional members. The stated purposes of the current plan, corresponding to like declarations in preceding years, are "to reduce insofar as possible the adverse effects of live television upon football game attendance and, in turn, upon the athletic and physical education programs dependent upon the proceeds...
Side 2 - Today we hold only that the record supports the District Court's conclusion that by curtailing output and blunting the ability of member institutions to respond to consumer preference, the NCAA has restricted rather than enhanced the place of intercollegiate athletics in the Nation's life.
Side 29 - Brandeis' opinion for the Court in Chicago Board of Trade to the Court opinion written by Mr. Justice Powell in Continental TV, Inc., the Court has adhered to the position that the inquiry mandated by the Rule of Reason is whether the challenged agreement is one that promotes competition or one that suppresses competition.
Side 35 - ... shall explain, in reaching this result, the Court traps itself in commercial antitrust rhetoric and ideology and ignores the context in which the restraints have been imposed. But it is essential at this point to emphasize that neither the Court of Appeals nor this Court purports to hold that the NCAA may not (1) require its members who televise their games to pool and share the compensation received among themselves, with other schools, and with the NCAA; (2) limit the number of times any member...
Side 150 - Chairman, thank you for your attention, and I will be happy to answer any questions you may have.