Om denne boken
Mitt bibliotek
Bøker på Google Play
Section
Page
7. PLEADING BY WAY OF RECITAL, IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND HYPOTHETICALLY.
Thompson v. Read (1909) 63 Misc. (N. Y.) 235....
Malott v. Sample (1904) 164 Ind. 645
327
328
Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. Ste. M. Ry. Co. (1908) 103
Minn. 224
332
Hasberg v. Moses (1903) 81 N. Y. App. Div. 199
Emison v. Owyhee Ditch Co. (1900) 37 Ore. 577.
334
337
8. ANTICIPATING DEFENSES.
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Henley (1901) 157 Ind. 90
Royal Ins. Co. v. Schwing (1888) 87 Ky. 41C...
A. L. Clark Lumber Co. v. Johns (1911) 98 Ark. 211.
9. SPECIAL DAMAGES.
338
339
341
Fledderman v. St. Louis Transit Co. (1908) 134 Mo. App. 199 343
Stephens v. Am. Fire Ins. Co. (1896) 14 Utah, 265..
353
CHAPTER V.
THE ANSWER.
1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES.
Strook Plush Co. v. Talcott (1908) 129 N. Y. App. Div. 14...
Jones v. City of Caldwell (1911) 20 Idaho, 5
356
368
Browning, King & Co. v. Terwilliger (1911) 144 N. Y. App. Div.
Prunty v. Consolidated Fuel & Light Co. (1910) 82 Kan. 541..
Cooper v. Am. Cent. Ins. Co. (1909) 139 Mo. App. 570..
Welles v. Colo. Nat. Life Assur. Co. (1911) 49 Colo. 508.
Smith v. Allen (1901) 63 Neb. 74
387
388
(c) Issues Raised by Denials.
Baxter v. St. Louis Transit Co. (1906) 198 Mo. 1........
Wiedeman v. Hedges (1901) 63 Neb. 103
Wilson v. Charleston & Savannah Ry. (1897) 51 S. C. 79.
Duff v. Willamette Steel Works (1904) 45 Ore. 479..
390
394
395
399
Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co. (1907) 49 Ore. 204 402
Jones v. El Reno Mill & Elevator Co. (1910) 26 Okla. 796.....
3. AFFIRMAtive DefenSES.
Jacoby v. James (1910) 136 N. Y. App., Div. 431
Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Forrest (1905) 73 Ohio St. 1.
Ramp v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. (1908) 133 Mo. App. 700...
Libby v. St. Louis, Iron Mt. & So. Ry. Co. (1909) 137 Mo. App. 276
State Savings Bank v. Albertson (1909) 39 Mont. 414..
Penn. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Ornauer (1907) 39 Colo. 498....
Columbia Nat. Bank v. Western Iron & Steel Co. (1896) 14
Wash. 162.
416
417
419
420
423
425
427
429
432
Vallancey v. Hunt (1910) 20 N. D. 579..
Thompson v. Halbert (1888) 109 N. Y. 329
4. INCONSISTENT DEFENSES.
Banta v. Siller (1898) 121 Cal. 414
Seattle Nat. Bank v. Carter (1895) 13 Wash. 281.
Loveland v. Jenkins-Boys Co. (1908) 49 Wash. 369.
436
438
442
445
448
450
454
5. ANSWERS IN ABATEMENT.
Needham v. Wright (1895) 140 Ind. 190
455
Callahan Co. v. Wall Rice Milling Co. (1909) 44 Ind. App. 372 457
McKim v. District Court (1910) 33 Nev. 44
459
6. COUNTERCLAIMS.
(a) General Nature.
General Electric Co. v. Williams (1898) 123 N. C. 51.
State v. Arkansas Brick & Mfg. Co. (1911) 98 Ark. 125.
Walker v. Am. Cent. Ins. Co. (1894) 143 N. Y. 167.
Shelton v. Conant (1894) 10 Wash. 193
461
463
466
469
470
473
Stoner v. Swift (1904) 164 Ind. 652
Nat. Fire Ins. Co. v. McKay (1860) 21 N. Y. 191.
Adams v. Schwartz (1910) 137 N. Y. App. Div. 230
478
(2) Connected with the Subject of the Action.
Wild Rice Lumber Co. v. Benson (1911) 114 Minn. 92.......
487
(3) In an Action on Contract, any Other on Contract.
Jansen v. Dolan (1911) 157 Mo. App. 32
Rooker v. Bruce (1909) 45 Ind. App. 57
490
493
(d) Parties to Counterclaims.
Weeks v. O'Brien (1898) 25 N. Y. App. Div. 206
494
Pope Mfg. Co. v. Charleston Cycle Co. (1898) 55 S. C. 528.... 496
(e) Jurisdictional Amount.
498
Howard Iron Works v. Buffalo Elevating Co. (1903) 176 N. Y. 1 500
(f) Existence at Commencement of Action.
Smith v. French (1906) 141 N. C. 1...
505
(g) Election between Counter claim and Independent Action.
Jones v. Witousek & Co. (1901) 114 Iowa, 14...
508
(h) Effect of Assignment on Right to Counterclaim.
Stadler v. First Nat. Bank of Helena (1898) 22 Mont. 190.... St. Louis Nat. Bank v. Gay (1894) 101 Cal. 286..
511
521
526
Kollock v. Scribner (1897) 98 Wis. 104.....
529
McCall Co. v. Stone (1905) 124 Wis. 572
551
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Parkinson (1903) 68 Neb. 319.
Sprunt v. Gordon (1911) 89 S. C. 426
552
553
Jeffries v. Fraternal Bankers' Reserve Society (1907) 135
Iowa, 284
Downey v. Colo. Fuel & Iron Co. (1910) 48 Colo. 27
Rice v. Rice (1886) 13 Ore. 337
560
561
Heaton v. Packer (1909) 131 N. Y. App. Div. 812
Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Nemnich (1902) 169 Mo. 388..
Sprague v. New York & N. E. Rd. Co. (1896) 68 Conn. 345.... 570
565
566
(c) Searching the Record.
Baxter v. McDonnell (1897) 154 N. Y. 432
571
Callahan v. Louisville Dry Goods Co. (1910) 140 Ky. 712.
Baldwin v. City of Aberdeen (1909) 23 S. D. 636
572
574
Fulton County Gas & Elec. Co. v. Hudson River Teleph. Co.
(1911) 200 N. Y. 287
Calif. Safe Dep. & Trust Co. v. Sierra Valleys Ry. Co. (1910)
158 Cal. 690
582
Fitger Brewing Co. v. Am. Bonding Co. (1911) 115 Minn. 78..
Kleinclaus v. Dutard (1905) 147 Cal. 245.
East St. Louis Ice Co. v. Kuhlmann (1911) 238 Mo. 685...... 589
Belden v. Wilkinson (1899) 44 N. Y. App. Div. 420....
Peterson v. Pantheon Lumber Co. (1911) 62 Wash. 189.
591
593
4. WANT OF LEGAL CAPACITY TO SUE.
Coddington v. Canaday (1901) 157 Ind. 243.
Los Angeles Ry Co. v. Davis (1905) 146 Cal. 179.
595
597
Page Woven Wire Fence Co. v. Joslin (1906) 38 Colo. 162.
601
5. ANOTHER ACTION PENDING.
Wetzstein v. Boston & Mont. Consol. Copper etc., Co.
(1903) 28 Mont. 451.
602
Kurtz v. Ogden Canyon Sanitarium Co. (1910) 37 Utah, 313... 617
Howe v. Coates (1903) 90 Minn. 508....
618
Rand v. Butte Elec. Ry Co. (1909) 40 Mont. 398...
624
St. Louis, I. M. & So. Ry. Co. v. Higgins (1884) 44 Ark. 293.. 627
Stenson v. Elfmann (1910) 26 S. D. 134.
628
Tate v. Rose (1909) 35 Utah, 229....
629
Sterling v. Smith (1893) 97 Cal. 343.
633
2. DEPARTURE.
Hill Brick & Tile Co. v. Gibson (1908) 43 Colo. 104..
Spiess' Adm'x v. Bartley (1908) 130 Ky, 277...
Johnson v. State Bank of Seneca (1898) 59 Kan. 250.
Brown v. Baker (1901) 39 Ore. 66..
636
637
639
640
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Mountain Park Stock
Farm Co. (1909) 23 Okla. 79.
642
3. COUNTERCLAIM IN REPLY.
Beakey v. Vander Meerschen (1908) 78 Kan. 538......
645
4. WAIVER OF REPLY.
Merchants' Nat. Bank v. Barlow (1900) 79 Minn. 234........ 647
CHAPTER VIII.
MOTIONS
1. IN GENERAL.
Wallace v. Lewis (1890) 9 Mont. 399..
650
2. MOTION TO STRIKE.
Tittle v. Kennedy (1904) 71 S. C. 1....
Ewing v. Vernon County (1908) 216 Mo. 681.
Blemel v. Shattuck (1892) 133 Ind. 498.
Swank v. Elwert (1910) 55 Ore. 487..
655
656
657
659
3. MOTION TO MAKE MORE DEFINITE AND CERTAIN.
Casey v. Dorr (1910) 94 Ark. 433..
Grimes v. Cullison (1895) 3 Okla. 268.
668
669
Blair v. Wilkeson Coal & Coke Co. (1909) 54 Wash. 334.
Cornell v. Haight (1910) 87 Neb. 508...
Commonwealth Co. v. Nunn (1902) 17 Colo. App. 117.
Pugh v. Winona & St. Peter Rd. Co. (1882) 29 Minn. 390..
670
671
672
674
4. MOTION TO ELECT,
Darknell v. Coeur D'Alene & St. Joe Transp. Co. (1910) 18
Idaho 61
676
Le Breton v. Stanley Contracting Co. (1911) 15 Cal. App. 429
Thomas v. Ray (1910) 48 Colo. 423....
677
680
Board of Commissioners v. Am. Loan & Trust Co. (1899) 75
Minn. 489
689
Pratt, Hurst & Co. v. Tailer (1904) 99 N. Y. App. Div. 236.
Abbott v. Meinken (1900) 48 N. Y. Div. 109..
695
696
2. DILIGENCE OF PARTY Seeking Amendment.
Paulsen v. Modern Woodmen (1911) 21 N. D. 235....
698
Heiden v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co. (1909) 84 S. C. 117..
Home Ins. Co. v. Overturf (1904) 35 Ind. App. 361....
699
701
3. SHOWING OF PREJUDICE BY PARTY OPPOSING AMENDMENT.
Bowers v. Good (1909) 52 Wash. 384..
Flaherty v. Butte Elec. Ry. Co. (1911) 43 Mont. 141.
718