 But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or...  United States Supreme Court Reports - Side 444av United States. Supreme Court - 1922Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1953 - 874 sider
...Sac, 94 US 351, 352-353. A judgment is an absolute bar to a subsequent action on the same claim. "But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the *The stipulation for the" year 1933, which is typical, reads as follows : "It is hereby stipulated... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1914 - 768 sider
...or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose. But where the second action between the same parties is...controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1894 - 722 sider
...* * But where the seoond action is upon a different claim or demand, but between the same parties, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel...controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1898 - 924 sider
...action is brought for the same cause, goes on to say : " When a second action is upon a different claim, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issne or points controverted upon the determination of which the finding of the verdict was rendered.... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1908 - 718 sider
...claim or cause of action in this suit, there is no question that the former judgment is an estoppel as to those matters in issue or points controverted upon the determination of which the decree was rendered. Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 US 351 ; Equitable Trust Co. v. Fisher, 106 111.... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1959 - 820 sider
...demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose * * *. "But where the second action between the same parties is...controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1939 - 836 sider
...been presented, is strictly accurate, when applied to the demand or claim in controversy. * * * But, where the second action between the same parties is...to those matters in issue or points controverted." Opinion of the Court It is true that the validity of the patent was settled by the former suit, and,... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1964 - 972 sider
...judlcata Is Identity of issues. If the second action between the same parties or privies is upon the same claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an absolute bar to relitigation not only of those matters actually determined in the prior suit but also... | |
 | 1877 - 558 sider
...or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose. But where the second action between the same parties is...as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or pointa controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In this case,... | |
| |
