A Nation Under God?: The ACLU and Religion in American Politics

Forside
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 8. sep. 2005 - 264 sider
A Nation Under God? raises the question of why the ACLU relentlessly attacks public expressions of mainstream religious faith. The answer, according to the book's argument, is that the work of the ACLU is informed by a larger political project-modern liberalism-to transform American government and society into an administrative-welfare state. Modern liberalism requires two decisive changes in American politics if it is to be successful: First, the government of limited powers mandated by the Constitution must become a government of unlimited powers and scope. Second, free, self-reliant, and independent citizens must become dependent on and understand themselves as subservient to government. The ACLU's drive to remove religion and morality from the public square advances both goals.

Limited, constitutional government rests on the idea that rights come from God; the power of government should be limited commensurate to the limited purpose of legitimate government: to protect our natural, God-given rights. With God removed from the public square, it becomes much easier politically to argue that government is the source of rights, and that every expansion of government power is tantamount to an expansion of rights.

Further, self-reliant citizens are not in need of and are unlikely to support large government welfare programs. But self-reliancy is largely a function of self-control and moral responsibility. Immoral and irresponsible citizens are incapable of providing for themselves and their families. Driving God and morality out of the public square serves to break down public morality, which in turn creates classes of citizens who are dependent on government assistance and regulation.

Through endless litigation against public expressions of religion and morality and its distorted interpretations of the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses, the ACLU reveals its real agenda and its real allegiance, which is not to the Constitution or Bill of Rights, but to a radical liberal ideology that seeks

Inni boken

Innhold

THE ACLU AND RELIGION IN AMERICAN POLITICS TODAY
1
RELIGION AND POLITICS IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
11
RELIGION AND THE MORAL CONDITIONS OF FREEDOM IN THE AMERICAN FOUNDING
25
THE PROGRESSIVE REJECTION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF THE AMERICAN FOUNDING
45
THE BIRTH OF THE ACLU AND THE RISE OF MODERN LIBERALISM
57
BUILDING THE WALL OF SEPARATION THE ACLU TAKES RELIGION TO COURT
67
IMMORAL RELIGION? THE ACLUs SELECT DEFENSE OF RELIGIOUS FREE EXERCISE
93
CONCLUSION
115
GEORGE WASHINGTON FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS 1789
169
GEORGE WASHINGTON THANKSGIVING PROCLAMATION 1789
173
GEORGE WASHINGTON LETTER TO THE HEBREWS AT NEWPORT 1790
175
GEORGE WASHINGTON FAREWELL ADDRESS 1796
177
JAMES MADISON A MEMORIAL AND REMONSTRANCE 1785
193
THOMAS JEFFERSON VIRGINIA STATUTE FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY 1786
201
THOMAS JEFFERSON LETTER TO THE DANBURY BAPTISTS 1802
205
SAMUEL WEST SERMON ON THE RIGHT TO REBEL AGAINST GOVERNORS 1776
207

DOCUMENTS FROM THE FOUNDING ON RELIGION AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
127
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE IN CONGRESS JULY 4 1776
129
NORTHWEST ORDINANCE 1787
135
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 1787
137
STATE CONSTITUTIONS ACKNOWLEDGING GOD
139
SAMUEL COOPER SERMON ON THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MASSACHUSSETTS CONSTITUTION 1780
229
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
243
INDEX
245
Opphavsrett

Andre utgaver - Vis alle

Vanlige uttrykk og setninger

Om forfatteren (2005)

Thomas L. Krannawitter is a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute and an assistant professor of political science at Hillsdale College. He is the author of An Introduction to Citizenship for New Americans (2002).

Daniel C. Palm is a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute and an associate professor of political science at Azusa Pacific University. He is the editor of On Faith and Free Government (1997).

Bibliografisk informasjon