en are frivolous. William S. Lewis, for the motion. George E. Cooney, opposed. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with $10 costs.

LASHER, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF SARATOGA SPRINGS, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 5, 1900.) Joseph P. Brennan, for appellant. Edgar T. Brackett, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the case of Moody v. Village of Saratoga Springs, 163 N. Y. 581, 57 N. E. 1118. See 17 App. Div. 624, 47 N. Y. Supp. 1139. PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, MARTÍN, and WERNER, JJ.,

concur.

LAWRENCE, Appellant, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 20, 1900.) Joseph F. Daly, for appellant. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (Theodore Connoly, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 29 App. Div. 298, 51 N. Y. Supp. 416.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

LEACH, Respondent, v. SMITH, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 12, 1900.) Chauncey S. Truax, for appellant. William J. Lippmann, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 27 App. Div. 290, 50 N. Y. Supp. 664.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

In re LEGGAT. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 19, 1900.) Jacob Marks, for appellant. Justus A. B. Cowles and Charles P. Cowles, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order of appellate division reversed, with costs in this court only, and the order of the surrogate affirmed, without costs, on the authority of In re Leggat, 162 N. Y. 437, 56 N. E. 1009. See 47 App. Div. 643, 62 N. Y. Supp. 1140.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

LENNON, Respondent, v. SMITH et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. Feb. 13, 1900.) Frank E. Smith, for appellant. John T. Canavan, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 23 App. Div. 293, 48 N. Y. Supp. 456.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

LINTHICUM, Respondent, v. CASWELL, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 21, 1899.) John J. Linson, for appellant. Charles F. Cantine and P. Cantine, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 19 App. Div. 541, 46 N. Y. Supp. 610. All concur.

LIPP, Respondent, v. OTIS BROS. & CO., Appellant, et al. (Court of Appeals of New

York. March 13, 1900.) Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. See 161 N. Y. 559, 56 N. E. 79.

LOGAN et al., Appellants, v. DAVIDSON, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 27, 1900.) Edward P. Lyon, for appellants. Alexander Cameron and William B. Hill, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs. See 18 App. Div. 353, 45 N. Y. Supp. 961.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

LORTON et al., Appellants, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 20, 1900.) Thomas Allison, for appellants. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (Theodore Connoly, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 33 App. Div. 140, 53 N. Y. Supp. 333.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

In re LYMAN. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 18, 1900.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the appellate division of the supreme court in the Third judicial department, entered November 15, 1899, which affirmed pro forma an order, made by a justice of the supreme court at chambers, appointing a referee to take testimony herein and report the same to the said justice. The motion was made. upon the ground that the order originally appealed from is not appealable, no certificate allowing such appeal having been granted by the appellate division. The appellant, in opposition to the motion, requested leave to withdraw his appeal, without costs, upon the grounds that the counsel for the respondent had refused to consent to the granting of a certificate allowing the appeal, and that the appellate division had revoked its order of afirmance. William E. Schenck, for the motion. John P. Curley, opposed. No opinion. Application of appellant to withdraw appeal, without costs, granted.

In re LYMAN, Excise Com'r. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 8, 1900.) The questions certified were as follows: (1) Has the court jurisdiction to grant any relief on the facts set out in the petition? (2) Is the Erie County Athletic Club, the appellant, entitled to a trial by jury on the issues raised, as a matter of right? Moses Shire and Edward L. Jellinek, for appellant. Mead & Stranahan, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 46 App. Div. 387, 61 N. Y. Supp. 884. First question certified answered in the affirmative. Second question certified answered in the negative.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

MCAVENEY, Respondent, v. PASQUINI et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 5, 1900.) Charles H. Luscomb, for appellants. George S. Daniels, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 23 App. Div. 120, 48 N. Y. Supp. 896.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

MCCABE, Respondent, v. O'CONNOR et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 6, 1900.) Henry J. McCormick, for appellants. Frank S. Black, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion below. 4 App. Div. 354, 38 N. Y. Supp. 572.

GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur. PARKER, C. J., not voting.

MCCARRAN, Appellant, v. COOPER, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. April 24, 1900.) William T. Schley and J. Brownson Ker, for appellant. James C. De La Mare, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 16 App. Div. 311, 44 N. Y. Supp. 695.

GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, LANDON, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

MCCARTHY, Respondent, v. FEATHERSTON, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Feb. 27, 1900.) A. W. Boynton, for appellant. S. E. Maders, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See 15 App. Div. 625, 43 N. Y. Supp. 1158.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ.,

concur.

In re McCORMICK et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 8, 1900.) William R. Wilder and John Ewen, for appellant. George G. Dutcher, for respondents. Edwin Kempton, special guardian, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs to all parties payable out of the fund. See 40 App. Div. 73, 57 N. Y. Supp. 548.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

MCFARLAND, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 1, 1900.) Albert H. Harris, for appellant. E. C. Aiken, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 20 App. Div. 622, 46 N. Y. Supp. 1095.

BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, and CULLEN, JJ., concur. WERNER, J., dissents. PARKER, C. J., not voting.

In re MCGREIVEY et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 23, 1900.) P. W. Cullinan, for appellant. Thomas O'Connor, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 37 App. Div. 66, 55 N. Y. Supp. 599.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and VANN, JJ., concur.

MCKINNEY, Appellant, v. WHITE et al. (VREELAND et al., Respondents). (Court of

MAGNOLIA METAL CO.. Respondent, v. STERLINGWORTH RAILWAY SUPPLY CO. et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 6, 1900.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the appellate division of the supreme court in the First judicial department, entered on an order made at the August term, 1898 (33 App. Div. 633, 53 N. Y. Supp. 490), affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made on the grounds that the judgment of the appellate division was unanimous, and that the said appellate division has not allowed this appeal nor certified that questions of law have arisen which ought to be reviewed by the court of appeals. Nichols & Bacon, for the motion. Alex. Thain, opposed. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, and appeal dismissed, with costs.

MAHAR, Respondent, V. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. April 3, 1900.) Charles A. Pooley, for appellant. S. E. Filkins, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See 20 App. Div. 161, 46 N. Y. Supp. 847.

PARKER, C. J., and BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ.,

concur.

MARBURY v. STONE et al. (Court of ApWilliam peals of New York. Nov. 21, 1899.) D. Marvel, in pro. per. William H. Gibson, for appellant Marbury. Alfred Jaretzki, for respondents. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 17 App. Div. 352, 45 N. Y. Supp. 184. All concur.

MARKOE, Respondent, v. TIFFANY & CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 15, 1900.) Charles E. Miller, for appellant. Flamen B. Candler and Robert W. Candler, for respondent.

In re MAYOR. ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 1. 1900.) John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (John P. Dunn and Thomas C. Blake, of counsel), for city of New York. William A. Hoar and James A. Deering, for Thomas O. Woolf. Joseph A. Flannery, Charles V. Gabriel, Ernest Hall, and Thomas S. Bassford, for Selje et al. Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 49 App. Div. 114, 63 N. Y. Supp. 468.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

In re MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 1, 1900.) Tompkins McIlvaine, for appellant. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (John P. Dunn and Thomas C. Blake, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 46 App. Div. 52, 61 N. Y. Supp. 437.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and LANDON, JJ.. concur.

In re MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 22, 1900.) Barclay E. V. McCarty and Jared G. Baldwin, Jr., for appellants. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (Theodore Connoly, John P. Dunn, and Thomas C. Blake, of counsel), for respondent city of New York. Truman H. Baldwin, for respondents Mary A. Hoe and others.

PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed, with costs. See 51 App. Div. 436, 64 N. Y. Supp. 717.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, LANDON, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

MEAD, Respondent, v. MARTENS, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 27, 1900.) Isaac N. Mills and Arthur M. Johnson, for appellant. J. Mortimer Bell, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See 21 App. Div. 134, 47 N. Y. Supp. 299.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

MEIGS, Respondent, v. ROBERTS, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 16, 1900.) Motion to advance an appeal from an order of the appellate division in the Third judicial department, entered July 17. 1899 (42 App. Div. 290, 59 N. Y. Supp. 215), which reversed a judgment of the special term dismissing the complaint. The motion was made upon the ground that the speedy determination of the appeal may save much unnecessary litigation and the trial of many cases which are now pending. T. E. Hancock, for the motion. Motion granted, without costs. See 56 N. E. 838.

MERRITT et al., Respondents, v. MERRITT et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 9, 1900.) De B. Wilmot, for appellants. John R. Kuhn, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 32 App. Div. 442, 53 N. Y. Supp. 127.

METCALF et al. v. MOSES et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 6, 1900.) Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. See 161 N. Y. 587, 56 N. E. 67.

In re MITCHELL et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. Feb. 6, 1900.) T. F. Bush, for John P. Roosa, executor. Charles F. Cossum, for trustees.

PER CURIAM. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs, on opinion below. 36 App. Div. 542, 55 N. Y. Supp. 725.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and VANN, JJ.,

concur.

MONTGOMERY, Respondent, v. BRUSH ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. OF NEW YORK, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 12, 1900.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the appellate di

vision of the supreme court in the First judicial department, entered February 21, 1900 (48 App. Div. 12, 62 N. Y. Supp. 606), affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. The motion was made upon the ground that the action is one to recover compensation for services. and, under the provisions of section 191 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is not appealable to this court. William G. Wilson, for the motion. Noel Gale, opposed. Motion denied, with $10 costs.

MORGAN, Comptroller, et al., Appellants, v. WARNER et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 13, 1900.) John McLennan, for appellants. George B. Warner, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 45 App. Div. 424, 60 N. Y. Supp. 963.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT. HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

MOSEL, Respondent, V. WILLIAM H. FRANK BREWING CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Feb. 16, 1900.) M. Hallheimer, for appellant. Bernard J. Isecke, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 13 App. Div. 99, 42 N. Y. Supp. 1128.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

MOSES, Respondent. v. HATCH et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. May

8, 1900.) Artemus B. Smith, for appellants. William W. Niles, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 21 App. Div. 468, 47 N. Y. Supp. 554; 54 N. E. 1093.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

MUNSON, Appellant, v. MAGEE et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 9, 1900.) No opinion. Motion for reargu ment denied, with $10 costs. See 161 N. Y. 182, 55 N. É. 916.

MURRAY. Appellant, v. CHARMAN,__ Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. April 17, 1900.) Henry T. Dykman, for appellant. Everett P. Wheeler, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, withcosts. See 23 App. Div. 626, 48 N. Y. Supp. 1110.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, LANDON, and WERNER, JJ., con

cur.

MYERS et al., Respondents, v. PAINE et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. Feb. 27, 1900.) Eugene D. Hawkins, for appellants. A. J. Simpson and Benjamin N. Cardozo, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 13 App. Div. 332, 43 N. Y. Supp. 133. PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

MYERS et al., Respondents, v. WHEELER et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 9, 1900.) Joel W. Russell, for appellants. John G. Milburn, for respondents. Order affirmed on opinion below (24 App. Div. 327, 48 N. Y. Supp. 611), and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiffs on the stipulation, with costs. All concur.

NATIONAL HUDSON RIVER BANK, Respondent, v. MOFFETT et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 27, 1900.) Louis Marshall, for appellants. C. P. Collier, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 17 App. Div. 232, 45 N. Y. Supp. 588.

O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and VANN, JJ., concur.

NATIONAL WALL PAPER CO., Appellant, v. SIRE, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 12, 1900.) Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. See 163 N. Y. 122, 57 N. E. 293.

NELLIGAN, Respondent, v. NELLIGAN, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 11, 1900.) Motion to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the appellate division of the supreme court in the Third judicial department, entered May 7, 1898 (30 App. Div. 621, 52 N. Y. Supp. 1146), affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. The motion was made upon the ground that, in view of recent decisions of the court of appeals, appellant is advised that said court has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Dean & Horton, for the motion. Edward N.

Jackson, opposed. Motion granted, on payment of costs to be taxed up to this time and $10 costs of motion. See 55 N. E. 1097.

NEUMAN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK MUT. SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 6, 1900.) Motion to open default taken by reason of the nonappearance of counsel of appellant upon the call of the case, and to reinstate an appeal from an order of the appellate division of the supreme court in the Fourth judicial department, entered April 16, 1897 (17 App. Div. 72, 44 N. Y. Supp. 896), reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at special term, and granting a new trial. Thomas F. Conway, for the motion. T. Harvey Ferris, opposed. Motion to open default granted, on payment of $10 costs.

In re NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO. et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 22, 1900.) Ira A. Place and Samuel E. Williamson, for appellants. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (Theodore Connoly and George L. Sterling, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 49 App. Div. 281, 63 N. Y. Supp. 52.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, VANN, and CULLEN, JJ., concur. HAIGHT and LANDON, JJ., dissent.

NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant, v. BRENNAN et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 5, 1900.) Frank Hiscock, for appellant. William G. Tracy, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. 24 App. Div. 343, 48 N. Y. Supp. 675. PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, MARTIN, LANDON, and WERNER, JJ.,

concur.

NUGENT, Respondent, v. METROPOLI. TAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 9, 1900.) Henry Melville, Charles F. Brown, and Henry A. Robinson, for appellant. Andrew F. Murray and Arthur C. Palmer, for respondent. No opinion. Appeal dismissed, upon the ground that the judgment has been set aside by the court below (17 App. Div. 582, 45 N. Y. Supp. 596), without costs. All concur.

O'CONNOR, Respondent, v. STEVENSON et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 12, 1900.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the appellate divi sion of the supreme court in the Second judicial department, entered March 12, 1900 (49

a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the grounds that the appellate division has unanimously decided that the verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence, and that the exceptions raise no question of law which can be reviewed by this court. Luther W. Emerson, for the motion. William G. McCrea, opposed. No opinion. Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, with costs.

ODELL, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. Co., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 27, 1900.) Charles C. Paul

ding, for appellant. William H. H. Ely, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs. See 18 App. Div. 12, 45 N. Y. Supp. 464.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

O'SULLIVAN et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK EL. R. CO. et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 12, 1900.) Julien T. Davies and J. Osgood Nichols, for appellants. Treadwell Cleveland and William V. Rowe, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 20 App. Div. 384, 46 N. Y. Supp. 784.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PAGE BELTING CO., Respondent, v. PARKER, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 5, 1900.) Archibald C, Shenstone, for appellant. Jonathan C. Ross, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 21 App. Div. 160, 47 N. Y. Supp. 400.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, MARTIN, LANDON, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PARMENTER, Respondent, V. AMERICAN BOX MACH. CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. April 20, 1900.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the appellate division of the supreme court in the First judicial department, entered October 31, 1899 (44 App. Div. 47, 60 N. Y. Supp. 432), affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a trial term; a jury having been waived. The motion was made upon the grounds that this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal, it not having been allowed by the appellate division or by a judge of the court of appeals, and that the exceptions taken during the trial are frivolous. William S. Coleman, for the motion. Julius M. Mayer, opposed. No opinion. Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, without costs.

PARTRIDGE, Respondent, v. MILWAUKEE MECHANICS INS. CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Feb. 27, 1900.) Adelbert Moot, for appellant. William S. MacDonald, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 13 App. Div. 519, 43 N. Y. Supp. 632.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, LANDON, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PECHE, Appellant, v. SLOANE, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 5, 1900.) Samuel D. Sewards, for appellant. M. M. Forrest, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 16 App. Div. 458, 45 N. Y. Supp. 37.

GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, MARTIN, LANDON, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

In re PECK'S ESTATE. (Court of Appeals of New York. Feb. 6, 1900.) Daniel A.