Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

Pierce, for appellant. Horace White, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed, with costs. See 31 App. Div. 407, 52 N. Y. Supp. 1028.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ALLEN, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 11, 1900.) Louis Lowenstein, for appellant. Charles E. Le Barbier, for the People.

PER CURIAM. Judgment of conviction affirmed. See 47 App. Div. 625, 62 N. Y. Supp. 1143.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur. MARTIN, J., not voting.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. FOSTER, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 30, 1900.) Louis H. Reynolds, for appellant. Florence J. Sullivan, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment of conviction affirmed. See 43 App. Div. 621, 60 N. Y. Supp. 1145.

GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, and VANN, JJ., concur. PARKER, C. J., and MARTIN, J., not voting.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. HANNIGAN, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 21, 1899.) Jacob Rouss and Louis J. Grant, for appellant. Charles E. Le Barbier, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, on opinion below. 42 App. Div. 617, 58 N. Y. Supp. 703. All concur.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. KENNEDY, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. April 20, 1900.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the supreme court, New York county, rendered March 31, 1899, convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree. The motion was made upon the ground of laches on the part of the defendant and his attorney in prosecuting the appeal. Charles E. Le Barbier, for the motion. R. N. Moore, opposed.

PER CURIAM. Motion denied, subject to the following conditions: Time to settle case is extended to and including Saturday, the 19th day of May, 1900, if stipulation is entered into by the parties to argue the case at the next June term. Original stipulation, when executed, to be filed with the clerk of this court. See 55 N. E. 1099.

PEOPLE, Appellant, v. MERSHON, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 27, 1900.) A. H. F. Seeger, for appellant. Hector M. Hitchings, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed. See 43 App. Div. 541, 60 N. Y. Supp. 115.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, and WERNER, JJ., con

cur.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. MORAN, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Feb. 6, 1900.) Rollin M. Morgan, for appellant. Alfred Lauterbach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment of conviction affirmed. See 43 App. Div. 155, 59 N. Y. Supp. 312.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

[blocks in formation]

PEOPLE ex rel. ALLEN, Appellant, v. YORK et al., Police Com'rs, Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 22, 1900.) Joseph Fitch, for appellant. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (William J. Carr, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 48 App. Div. 611, 63 N. Y. Supp. 156.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, LANDON, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. AMERICAN BANKNOTE CO., Appellant, v. MORGAN, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 23, 1900.) Isaac L. Miller, for appellant. John C. Davies, Atty. Gen. (John H. Coyne, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the superintendent of public works had no power to make the contract_with the relator. 45 App. Div. 86, 60 N. Y. Supp. 1109.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and VANN, JJ., concur. O'BRIEN, J., dissents.

PEOPLE ex rel. BRADY et al., Appellants, v. MAXWELL, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 19, 1900.) George W. Titcomb, for appellants. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (William J. Carr and Luke D. Stapleton, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs. See 50 App. Div. 538, 64 N. Y. Supp. 96.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, LANDON, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. BRIGGS, Respondent, v. LYMAN, Excise Com'r, et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 22, 1900.) N. N. Stranahan and P. W. Cullinan, for appellants. Alfred E. Smith, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs. See 48 App. Div. 484, 62 N. Y. Supp. 902.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, LANDON, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. BROOKS, Respondent, v. DILLON et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 23, 1900.) Michael J. Tier

[blocks in formation]

PEOPLE ex rel. COLONIAL TRUST CO., Appellant, v. MORGAN, Comptroller, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. April 24, 1900.) Charles A. Collin and William F. Sheehan, for appellant. H. B. Coman and John C. Davies, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 47 App. Div. 126, 62 N. Y. Supp. 191.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, and MARTIN, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC CHARITIES, Respondents, v. MOFFETT, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 8, 1900.) Howard A. Sperry, for appellant. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (Adrian T. Kiernan and Theodore Connoly, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed. See 19 App. Div. 631, 45 N. Y. Supp. 1146.

BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., 'concur. MARTIN, J., dissents. O'BRIEN, J., not voting.

PEOPLE ex rel. CORNELL STEAMBOAT CO., Respondent, v. DEDERICK, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 21, 1899.) Reargument ordered upon the question whether there is any authority in law for a deduction of the debts of a corporation in assessing its personal property for town, county, and municipal purposes. See 55 N. E. 927.

PEOPLE ex rel. COVENEY, Respondent, v. KEARNY, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Jan. 23, 1900.) John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley, of counsel), for appellant. James M. Hunt, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 44 App. Div. 449, 61 N. Y. Supp. 41.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and VANN, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. FAHY, Appellant, v. YORK et al., Police Com'rs, Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 8, 1900.) Hyacinthe Ringrose, for appellant. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. 49 App. Div. 173, 63 N. Y. Supp. 36.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. GOODRICH, Appellant, v. SOUTHWORTH LIBRARY ASS'N, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 19. 1900.) Monroe M. Sweetland, for appellant. Halliday & Denton, for respondent.

57 N.E.-71

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs. See 45 App. Div. 629, 61 N. Y. Supp. 1144. PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, and CULLEN, JJ.,

concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. GRANNIS et al., Respondents, v. ROBERTS, Comptroller, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 19, 1900.) Motion for reargument denied, without costs. See 163 N. Y. 70, 57 N. E. 98.

PEOPLE ex rel. HARTOUGH, Appellant, v. SCANNELL, Fire Com'r, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 19, 1900.) Hugo Hirsh, for appellant. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (William J. Carr, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 48 App. Div. 445, 62 N. Y. Supp. 930.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, LANDON, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. KOCH, Respondent, v. ODELL, Mayor. (Court of Appeals of New York. March 13, 1900.) C. L. Waring, for appellant. A. H. F. Seeger, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs. See 44 App. Div. 630, 60 N. Y. Supp. 1145.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. LANG, Appellant, v. YORK et al., Police Com'rs, Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 1, 1900.) Philip Carpenter, for appellant. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on the prevailing opinion below. 45 App. Div. 459, 61 N. Y. Supp. 547.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. LANGDON et al., Appellants, v. DALTON et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 11, 1900.) George Wallace, for appellants. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (William J. Carr, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs. See 49 App. Div. 71, 63 N. Y. Supp. 258.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and LANDON, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. MADCHENHEIM-VEREIN, Respondent, v. MCDONOUGH, Secretary of State, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 19, 1900.) Henry B. Coman, for appellant. Mornay Williams, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs. See 47 App. Div. 629, 62 N. Y. Supp. 1145.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN,, LANDON, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. MALLON, Appellant, v. ROOSEVELT et al., Board of Police, Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 19, 1900.) Philip Carpenter, for appellant. John

Whalen, Corp. Counsel (Theodore Connoly, of
counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed, with costs.
See 16 App. Div. 331, 44 N. Y. Supp. 655.
O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN,
LANDON, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. MEYERS. Respondent, Y.
DILLON et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals
of New York. Jan. 23, 1900.) Michael J. Tier-
ney, for appellants. J. Addison Young, for re-
spondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs.
See 46 App. Div. 187, 61 N. Y. Supp. 537.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN,
BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and VANN,
JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. NEW YORK CENT. & H.
R. R. CO., Respondent, v. HILTS et al., Town
Assessors, Appellants. (Court of Appeals of
New York. June 19, 1900.) C. A. Hitchcock,
for appellants. Albert H. Harris, for respond-
ent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs.
See 47 App. Div. 629, 62 N. Y. Supp. 1145.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BART-
LETT. HAIGHT, VANN, LANDON, and
CULLEN, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel SMITH et al., Appellants, v.
ALLEN, Highway Com'r, Respondent. (Court
of Appeals of New York. March 20, 1900.) H.
H. Ryel, for appellants. Henry W. Bentley, for
respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs,
on opinion below. See 37 App. Div. 248, 55 N.
Y. Supp. 1057.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BART-
LETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and
LANDON, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. SMITH, Appellant, v.
DOYLE et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals
of New York. May 1, 1900.) Alexander S.
Bacon, for appellant. John H. Coyne and John
C. Davies, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs,
on opinions below. 44 App. Div. 402, 60 N. Y.
Supp. 1088.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BART-
LETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and
LANDON, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. WARD, Appellant,
DRAKE et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals
of New York. Jan. 23, 1900.) Simon Fleisch-
mann, for appellant. Henry W. Killeen, for re-
spondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs.
See 45 App. Div. 631, 61 N. Y. Supp. 1145.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN,
BARTLETT, MARTIN, and VANN, JJ., con-
cur. HAIGHT, J., not voting.

PHILADELPHIA, R. & N. E. R. CO., Ap-
pellant, v. BOWMAN, Respondent. (Court of
Appeals of New York. May 22, 1900.) Milton
A. Fowler, for appellant. Robert F. Wilkinson,
for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with
costs, on opinion below. 23 App. Div. 170, 48
N. Y. Supp. 901.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT,
MARTIN, VANN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PIEHL, Appellant, v. ALBANY RY., Re-
spondent. (Court of Appeals of New York.
March 20, 1900.) Mark Cohn, for appellant.
Lewis E. Carr, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with
costs, on opinion below. 30 App. Div. 166, 51
N. Y. Supp. 755.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BART-
LETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and VANN, JJ.,

concur.

In re PLUMMER. (Court of Appeals of New
York. Jan. 8, 1900.) Evarts, Choate & Bea-
man, for appellant. Jabish Holmes. Jr., for re-
spondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with
costs, on authority of In re Sherman's Estate,
153 N. Y. 1, 46 N. E. 1032. All concur. See 62
N. Y. Supp. 1145.

POHLE, Respondent, v. SECOND AVE. R.
CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York.
Feb. 16, 1900.) Charles F. Brown and Henry
A. Robinson, for appellant. Charles Steckler
and Alfred Steckler, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order and judgment affirm-
ed, with costs. See 13 App. Div. 393, 42 N. Y.
Supp. 1092.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT,
MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER,
JJ., concur.

POST et al., Respondents, v. GREEN et al.,
Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York.
April 3, 1900.) Abraham Gruber, for appel-
lants. Edward B. Hill, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with
costs, on opinion below. 10 App. Div. 316, 41
N. Y. Supp. 758.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT,
MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER,
JJ., concur.

PURDY, Respondent, v. ERIE R. CO., Appel-
lant. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 1,
1900.) Motion for reargument denied, with $10
costs. See 162 N. Y. 42, 56 N. E. 508; 55 N. E.
1099.

QUINN, Appellant, v. YORK et al., Police
Com'rs, Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New
York. June 22, 1900.) Thomas E. Rush, for ap-
pellant. John Whalen, Corp. Counsel (Theodore
Connoly and Charles A. O'Neil, of counsel), for
respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs.
See 42 App. Div. 622, 59 N. Y. Supp. 1113.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BART-
LETT. HAIGHT, VANN, LANDON, and
CULLEN, JJ., concur.

RANDALL et al. v. BANK OF AMERICA
(KNEVALS, Appellant). (Court of Appeals of
New York. Jan. 9, 1900.) Walter S. Logan,
for appellant. Philip G. Bartlett and Alfred B.
Thacher, for respondents. No opinion. Judg
ment affirmed, with costs. on opinion below. 27
App. Div. 146, 50 N. Y. Supp. 748. All concur.

RANSCHT, Respondent, v. WRIGHT, Appel-
lant. (Court of Appeals of New York. April
3, 1900.) William A. Woodworth and Isaac N.
Mills, for appellant. Wilson Brown, Jr, for re-
spondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with
costs. See 9 App. Div. 108, 41 N. Y. Supp. 108.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT,
MARTIN, VANN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

RAY, Appellant, v. KEENE et al., Respond-

ents. (Court of Appeals of New York. Nov. 21,

1899.) Abram I. Elkus and Edward C. James,
for appellant. Joseph Larocque and Joseph
Larocque, Jr., for respondents. No opinion.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See
19 App. Div. 147, 45 N. Y. Supp. 896.

In re REED. (Court of Appeals of New

York. Nov. 21, 1899.) Howard Chipp, for

appellant.

be affirmed, with costs. See 17 App. Div. 257,

45 N. Y. Supp. 687.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BART-
LETT, HAIGHT, VANN, LANDON, and
CULLEN, JJ., concur.

RODGERS, Appellant, v. CLEMENT, Re-
spondent. (Court of Appeals of New York.
May 15, 1900.) Motion for reargument denied,
with $10 costs. See 162 N. Y. 422, 56 N. E.

901.
John D. Eckert, for respondent.
No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. All
concur. See 22 App. Div. 328, 47 N. Y. Supp.
971.

RENNINGER, Appellant, v. NEW YORK
CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Respondent. (Court
of Appeals of New York. Feb. 27, 1900.) Cal-
vin S. Crosser, for appellant. Charles A. Poo-
ley, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, and judg-

ment absolute ordered for defendant on the

stipulation, with costs. See 11 App. Div. 565,

42 N. Y. Supp. 813.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, HAIGHT,
LANDON, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ.,

concur.

RICHARDS et al., Appellants, v. WASH-
BURN et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals
of New York. June 5, 1900.) J. Tred well
Richards, for appellants. William H. Sage,
for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with
costs. See 28 App. Div. 109, 50 N. Y. Supp.
885.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN,
HAIGHT, MARTIN, LANDON, and WER-
NER, JJ., concur.

ROCHESTER SAV. BANK, Respondent,
v. FOLTZ, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of
New York. May 22, 1900.) Charles R. Car-
ruth and Clarence U. Carruth, for appellant.
Edward Harris, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with
costs. See 35 App. Div. 632, 55 N. Y. Supp.
1147.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, BARTLETT,
MARTIN, VANN, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

ROCHESTER & H. V. R. CO., Respondent,
v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, Appellant. (Court
of Appeals of New York. June 22, 1900.) P.
M. French, for appellant. Joseph W. Taylor,
for respondent.

PER CURIAM. The judgment should be so
modified that, after its recitals, the second
clause shall read as follows: "Second. That
the defendant, the city of Rochester, and its
official authorities, have not, under the provi-
sions of chapter 62 of the Laws of 1853, the
right to lay out the proposed street across the
land and tracks of the plaintiff, without com-
pensation,"-and so that its fourth clause shall
read: "Fourth. That the defendant, its offi-
cers and agents, and each of them, and all per-
sons acting under it, them, or either of them,
be perpetually enjoined and restrained from
opening said street or streets, pursuant to the
provisions of chapter 62 of the Laws of 1853,
across and upon plaintiff's said premises, and
from proceeding any further, pursuant to said
chapter 62 of the Laws of 1853, in the pro-
ceedings instituted by it to open the streets
hereinabove referred to, or any part thereof,
so far as the same affect the land of the plain-
tiff hereinabove and in the complaint describ-
ed,”—and, as so modified, the judgment should

ROWE, Appellant, v. BROOKLYN LIFE
INS. CO., Respondent. (Court of Appeals of
New York. March 6, 1900.) Louis C. Rowe,
for appellant. William H. Ford, for respond-

ent.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

SINTEFF, Respondent, V. PEOPLE'S
BUILDING, LOAN & SAVING ASS'N, Ap-
pellant. (Court of Appeals of New York.
April 20, 1900.) Motion to dismiss an appeal
from a judgment of the appellate division of
the supreme court in the Fourth judicial de-
partment, entered February 18, 1899 (37 App.
Div. 340, 57 N. Y. Supp. 611), affirming a
judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a
decision of the court at a trial term without
a jury. The motion was made upon the
grounds that the appeal is frivolous, and taker
simply for delay, the appellant's only excep
tion being general, and presenting no question
of law for the consideration of this court,→
and that the decision of the appellate division
was unanimous and without an opinion.
Frank M. Hardenbrook, for the motion. Ches-
ter M. Elliott, opposed. Motion denied, with
$10 costs. See 54 N. E. 1094.

SKANEATELES WATERWORKS CO.,

Appellant, v. LESLIE et al., Respondents.

(Court of Appeals of New York. Feb. 6,

1900.) Motion for reargument denied, with
$10 costs. See 161 N. Y. 626, 55 N. E. 1100.

SKANEATELES WATERWORKS CO.,
Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF SKANEATE-
LES et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals
of New York. Feb. 6, 1900.) No opinion.
Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs.
See 161 N. Y. 154, 55 N. E. 562.

SMITH, Respondent, v. CROCKER, Ap-
pellant. (Court of Appeals of New York.
March 6, 1900.) Charles K. Beekman and
Charles B. Alexander, for appellant. Welton C.
Percy, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with
costs. See 14 App. Div. 245, 43 N. Y. Supp.
427; 52 N. E. 1126.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN,
HAIGHT, LANDON, CULLEN, and WERN-
ER, JJ., concur.

« ForrigeFortsett »