The Principles of the American Law of Contracts at Law and in EquityThomas law book Company, 1923 - 755 sider |
Innhold
271 | |
272 | |
273 | |
276 | |
278 | |
280 | |
281 | |
282 | |
82 | |
83 | |
84 | |
85 | |
86 | |
87 | |
88 | |
89 | |
90 | |
91 | |
92 | |
100 | |
135 | |
136 | |
137 | |
139 | |
149 | |
167 | |
169 | |
170 | |
176 | |
177 | |
179 | |
180 | |
181 | |
182 | |
187 | |
188 | |
190 | |
192 | |
201 | |
202 | |
203 | |
204 | |
205 | |
206 | |
207 | |
208 | |
209 | |
210 | |
211 | |
212 | |
213 | |
215 | |
216 | |
217 | |
218 | |
219 | |
221 | |
222 | |
223 | |
224 | |
228 | |
231 | |
232 | |
235 | |
237 | |
238 | |
239 | |
242 | |
243 | |
244 | |
245 | |
246 | |
247 | |
250 | |
251 | |
309 | |
310 | |
311 | |
312 | |
314 | |
316 | |
318 | |
340 | |
341 | |
361 | |
363 | |
364 | |
365 | |
366 | |
371 | |
373 | |
375 | |
376 | |
379 | |
380 | |
381 | |
382 | |
383 | |
384 | |
386 | |
388 | |
390 | |
391 | |
392 | |
393 | |
395 | |
426 | |
427 | |
430 | |
432 | |
433 | |
434 | |
438 | |
444 | |
445 | |
451 | |
474 | |
475 | |
476 | |
495 | |
499 | |
505 | |
511 | |
513 | |
520 | |
521 | |
522 | |
525 | |
529 | |
538 | |
567 | |
586 | |
597 | |
608 | |
625 | |
629 | |
645 | |
664 | |
10 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
The principles of the American law of contracts at law and in equity J.D. Lawson Begrenset visning - 1892 |
The Principles American Law of Contracts: At Law and in Equity (Classic Reprint) John D. Lawson Ingen forhåndsvisning tilgjengelig - 2017 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
acceptance action agency agent agreed agreement apply authority avoid Bank becomes benefit binding bound breach Brown claim Clark common condition Conn consideration Contr contract corporation court creditor damages debt deed defendant Disaffirmance discharge duty effect enforce entered equity evidence executed existence express fact fraud give given ground held husband illegal implied infant intention interest Johns Johnson Jones land letter liability Mass means ment Minn N. W. Rep nature necessaries obligation offer paid party payment performance person Pick plaintiff principal promise purchase question ratification reasonable received recover relation rule seal sell Smith statute sued supplied thing tion tract unless valid void Wall wife writing
Populære avsnitt
Side 432 - The objection, that a contract is immoral or illegal as between plaintiff and defendant, sounds at all times very ill in the mouth of the defendant. It is not for his sake, however, that the objection is ever allowed ; but it is founded in general principles of policy, which the defendant has the advantage of, contrary to the real justice, as between him and the plaintiff, by accident, if I may so say.
Side 305 - But every one has a right to select and determine with whom he will contract, and cannot have another person thrust upon him without his consent. In the familiar phrase of Lord Denman, '• you have the right to the benefit you anticipate from the character, credit, and substance of the party with whom you contract.
Side 317 - Ignorantia juris haud excusat ' ; but in that maxim the word ' jus ' is used in the sense of denoting general law. the ordinary law of the country. But when the word ' jus ' is used in the sense of denoting a private right, that maxim has no application. Private right of ownership is a matter of fact ; it may be the result also of matter of (1) LR 2 HL, 149.
Side 117 - ... or upon any agreement that is not to be performed within the space of one year from the making thereof, unless the agreement upon which such action shall be brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith or some other person...
Side 116 - g reements (1677) no action shall be brought whereby to charge any executor or administrator upon any special promise to answer damages out of his own estate...
Side 140 - That a contract for the sale of articles then existing, or such as the vendor, in the ordinary course of his business, manufactures or procures for the general market, whether on hand at the time or not, is a contract for the sale of goods, to which the statute applies. But, on the other hand, if the goods are to be manufactured especially for the purchaser, and upon his special order, and not for the general market, the case is not within the statute.
Side 447 - ... contracts are to be construed and interpreted according to the laws of the State in which they are made, unless from their tenor it is perceived that they were entered into with a view to the laws of some other State.
Side 138 - That no contract for the sale of any goods, wares, and merchandise, for the price of ten pounds sterling or upwards, shall be allowed to be good, except the buyer shall accept part of the goods so sold, and actually receive the same, or give something in earnest to bind the bargain, or in part payment, or that some note or memorandum in writing of the said bargain be made and signed by the parties to be charged by such contract, or their agents thereunto lawfully authorized.
Side 286 - The result seems to be that where an agreement is entered into on a sufficient consideration, whereby an authority is given for the purpose of securing some benefit to the donee of the authority, such an authority is irrevocable. This is what is usually meant by an authority coupled with an interest.
Side 117 - ... whereby to charge the defendant upon any special promise to answer for the debt, default...