 The court said there must be reasonable evidence of negligence; but where the thing is .shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have...  Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of ... - Side 563av Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - 1919Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | 1869 - 1032 sider
...conclusion : that there must be reasonable evidence of negligence ; that where the thing is solely under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of things, does not happen to those who have the management of machinery and use... | |
 | 1866 - 1074 sider
...(affirming the decision of the Court of Exchequer), that where tlie thing which causes the accident is shewn to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as would not happen in the ordinary course of management, the accident itself, if unexplained, is reasonable... | |
 | Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee, Edmund F. Moore - 1864 - 596 sider
...Chief Justice Erie, in the case of Scott v. The London and St. Katherine's Docks Company (c), " where the thing is shown to be under the management of the...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the Defendants, that the accident arose from want of care," which rule, we submit, is applicable to the... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1867 - 930 sider
...was here declared by the Exchequer Chamber, that where the thing which causes the accident is known to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as would not happen in the ordinary course of management, the accident itself, if unexplained, is reasonable... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1867 - 944 sider
...was here declared by the Exchequer Chamber, that where the thing which causes the accident is known to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is *uch as would not happen in the ordinary course of management, the accident itself, if unexplained,... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1905 - 922 sider
...London Dock Co., 3 H. & C. (Com. LRUS, 134,) said: "There must be some evidence of negligence, but when the thing is shown to be under the management...defendant or his servants and the accident is such that, as in the ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use the... | |
 | 1890 - 542 sider
...explanations, is of itself evidence of negligence. It is urged that where the instrument or machinery is shown to be under the management of the defendant...defendant, that the accident arose from want of care. But instances are not (infrequent of steam-boiler explosions where there has been no want of ordinary... | |
 | 1881 - 572 sider
...Dock Co., 3 H. & C. 59G; 34 LJ (Ex.) 220, "There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such us in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,... | |
 | 1881 - 572 sider
...LJ (Ex.) ZX>, "There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to bo under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such из iu the ordinary course of things does not bap)>eii if those who have the management use proper... | |
 | 1871 - 874 sider
...by the defendant, and the court said, " There must be reasonable evidence of negligence ; tut where the thing is shown to be under the management of the...defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." So in Ourtis v. The Rochester and Syracuse Railroad Company, 18 NY 543, the Court of Appeals of New... | |
| |
