Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of ... , 93-2, Apr. 24, 26 and 29, 19741974 - 275 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 99
Side 1
... conversations . Unfortunately , increasing numbers of Americans have begun to fear that Govern- ment is more interested in intruding into their private lives than in acting to protect their privacy . A basic purpose of these hearings is ...
... conversations . Unfortunately , increasing numbers of Americans have begun to fear that Govern- ment is more interested in intruding into their private lives than in acting to protect their privacy . A basic purpose of these hearings is ...
Side 17
... conversations intercepted for so - called national security reasons . From the very beginning , those sensitive to civil liberties recog- nized the dangers of warrantless wiretaps . Such taps enable the Government to exercise unchecked ...
... conversations intercepted for so - called national security reasons . From the very beginning , those sensitive to civil liberties recog- nized the dangers of warrantless wiretaps . Such taps enable the Government to exercise unchecked ...
Side 19
... conversations will not be invaded unless a neutral court first de- termines that the invasion is justified pursuant to the Constitution . The Surveillance Practices and Procedures Act is designed to provide that assurance . The bill ...
... conversations will not be invaded unless a neutral court first de- termines that the invasion is justified pursuant to the Constitution . The Surveillance Practices and Procedures Act is designed to provide that assurance . The bill ...
Side 25
... conversation you want to wiretap , you have to describe the premises that you want to wiretap , and you have to give the probable cause for the wiretap . You are making a different argu- ment . You are arguing it is a violation to use ...
... conversation you want to wiretap , you have to describe the premises that you want to wiretap , and you have to give the probable cause for the wiretap . You are making a different argu- ment . You are arguing it is a violation to use ...
Side 30
... conversations intercepted for so - called " national security " reasons . From the very beginning , those sensitive to civil liberties recognized the dan- gers of warrantless wiretaps . Such taps enable the government to exercise ...
... conversations intercepted for so - called " national security " reasons . From the very beginning , those sensitive to civil liberties recognized the dan- gers of warrantless wiretaps . Such taps enable the government to exercise ...
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
abuses activities administration agencies American citizens application approval Attorney authorized Bell System bill black bag jobs Chairman civil COHEN committee conducted Congress consent constitutional rights court order criminal DANIELSON Defense Department of Defense Department of Justice device disclose disclosure District Court domestic DRINAN eavesdropping electronic surveillance Federal foreign intelligence foreign power Fourth Amendment FRIEDMAN Gaylord Nelson Halperin illegal individual installed interception investigation involved judge judicial warrant Justice Department KASTEN MEIER KASTENMEIER Keith law enforcement legislation ment MILLER Morton Halperin national security tap national security wiretaps obtained oral communications organized crime overheard parties person PETERSEN President probable cause problem procedures prosecution protect purpose question record request Senator NELSON statement subcommittee Supreme Court testimony tion title 18 Title III United States Code unlawful violation warrantless taps warrantless wiretaps wire or oral wiretapping and electronic
Populære avsnitt
Side 254 - ... no person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person...
Side 258 - They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone — the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
Side 40 - Constitution, independent tribunals of justice will consider themselves in a peculiar manner the guardians of those rights ; they will be an impenetrable bulwark against every assumption of power in the Legislative or Executive ; they will be naturally led to resist every encroachment upon rights expressly stipulated for in the Constitution by the declaration of rights.
Side 18 - To protect that right, every unjustifiable intrusion by the Government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Side 154 - USC 605) shall limit the constitutional power of the President to take such measure as he deems necessary to protect the Nation against actual or potential attack or other hostile acts of a foreign power, to obtain foreign intelligence information deemed essential to the security of the United States, or to protect national security information against foreign intelligence activities.
Side 14 - ... in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof if the disclosure of that information would be in violation of this chapter.
Side 37 - The requirement that warrants shall particularly describe the things to be seized makes general searches under them impossible and prevents the seizure of one thing under a warrant describing another. As to what is to be taken, nothing is left to the discretion of the officer executing the warrant.
Side 14 - Every order and extension thereof shall contain a provision that the authorization to intercept shall be executed as soon as practicable, shall be conducted in such a way as to minimize the interception of communications not otherwise subject to interception under this chapter, and must terminate upon attainment of the authorized objective, or in any event in thirty days.
Side 260 - ... (a) actual damages but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $100 a day for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is higher; (b) punitive damages; and (c) a reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.
Side 4 - Board, its member, agent, or agency, there to produce evidence if so ordered, or there to give testimony touching the matter under investigation or in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof.