Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

EXHIBIT N.-Federal grants to the District of Columbia—Continued

[blocks in formation]

EXHIBIT N.-Federal grants to the District of Columbia-Continued

[blocks in formation]

903, 841

(h) Aid to Cuban refugees.

(g) Assistance to repatriates.

(i) Children's Bureau.

(j) Economic Opportunity Act, title V.

(k) Economic Opportunity Act, title 1-B.
(1) Juvenile delinquency and youth
offenders control.

(m) Mental health training.
(n) AFDC work scholarship.

(0) Cooperative program with voca-
tional rehabilitation..

(p) Food stamp program..

(q) Family emergency services.

(r) Job placement and training.

(s) Milk fund, Agriculture.

(t) Headstart (Junior Village).

(u) Bootstrap_

(v) Summer welfare.

(w) Office of Education project.

(x) Older Americans Act..

Total, Public Welfare.

428, 263
360

1,440, 440

1,021, 464

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

131, 320

2,473,640 1,046, 034

1,500

25,000

185,064

[blocks in formation]

22. Highways and Traffic:

(a) Primary, secondary, and urban
highways.

(b) Interstate System.

[blocks in formation]

(c) Highway beautification..

(d) Urban beautification..

(e) Economic Opportunity Act (title 1-B).
(1) F St. demonstration....

[blocks in formation]

Total, Highways and Traffic.

38, 549, 831

See footnotes at end of table.

21,867,012 22, 921, 994 72, 221, 379 111, 328, 088

EXHIBIT N.-Federal grants to the District of Columbia—Continued

[blocks in formation]

1 Federal grant based upon credits earned by District-financed construction in urban renewal areas during previous years.

* Federal grant based upon obligation of District matching share. Planning and scheduling will prevent the obligation, by the end of the fiscal year, of total District-appropriated funds. Federal funds not actually qualified for carryover to future years.

Note. The above information is based on data available as of Feb. 10, 1967, and includes only those grant programs which have been funded or which are expected to be funded in the near future. Amounts for 1967 and 1968 are subject to possible revision as later information becomes available.

Mr. TOBRINER. I therefore submit myself for such questions as the committee may desire.

Senator SPONG. In your statement you say that the existing legislation is expected to produce $405.8 million in fiscal 1968. Does that figure include the $8 million expected from the increase in personalproperty and real-estate taxes?

Mr. TOBRINER. It does, sir.

Senator SPONG. It does include that.

Aside from the funds in the bills we are considering an increase in personal-property and real-estate taxes, do you foresee any new sources of revenue for fiscal 1968 ?

Mr. TOBRINER. Outside of the increase in the property taxes which have been approved by the Board of Commissioners, I see no further sources of income for 1968, unless at a later date the Congress should authorize additional revenue-producing measures.

Senator SPONG. Will you supply for the record a list of all the revenue sources, both existing and proposed, for fiscal 1968 and the amount of revenue expected from those years? Mr.TOBRINER. Yes, sir.

81-348 0-67

Comparison of revenue estimates for fiscal years 1967 and 1968, approved by Budget Bureau, May 12, 1967

[blocks in formation]

Senator SPONG. Would you also submit at the same time with your sources of revenue the comparable figures for Maryland and Virginia? Mr. TOBRINER. We do not have comparable collection figures. We do have however, a table, Mr. Chairman, relating to the adjoining jurisdictions, which shows a rate comparison of major taxes. In other words, we have Arlington, Fairfax, Montgomery, and Prince George's.

We can submit that.

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, FINANCE OFFICE

RATE COMPARISON OF MAJOR TAXES IN THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA, FISCAL YEAR 1968

[blocks in formation]

Average effective tax rate of $1.49 per $100 of current market value. The actual tax rate is $2.90 per $100 of assessed valuation.

Maryland

Montgomery County.'-Average effective tax rate of $1.763 per $100 of current market value on residential property. Actual tax rates vary among the 74 taxing jurisdictions from $2.95 in rural areas to $3.64 in urbanized areas per $100 of assessed valuation. In addition to the basic state, county, and school rates amounting to $2.85 per $100 of assessed valuation, there are various special area taxes for fire, recreation, sanitary, metropolitan and regional purposes. Effective tax rates accordingly vary from $1.58 to $1.95 per $100 of market value. As applied to business properties where free parking facilities are provided, the actual tax rates include a special parking lot rate varying from 27 cents to 60 cents per $100 of assessed valuation. Town rates applicable in specific areas are excluded.

Prince George's County.-Average effective tax rate of $1.679 per $100 of current market value. Actual tax rates vary among some 14 taxing jurisdictions from $3.000 in rural areas to $3.325 in urbanized areas per $100 of assessed valuation. In addition to the basic state and county rates amounting to $2.90 per $100 of assessed valuation, there are various special area taxes for fire, park and planning, metropolitan and sanitary purposes. Effective tax rates accordingly vary from $1.59 to $1.77 per $100 of market value. Town rates applicable in specific areas are excluded.

Virginia

Alexandria.-Average effective tax rate of $1.342 per $100 of current market value. The actual tax rate is $3.11 per $100 of assessed valuation.

Arlington County.-Average effective tax rate of $1.2945 per $100 of current market value. The actual tax rate is $3.83 per $100 of assessed valuation.

Fairfax County.-Average effective tax rate of $1.442 per $100 of current market value. Actual tax rate is $4.05 per $100 of assessed valuation.

Fairfax City.-Average effective tax rate of $1.525 per $100 of current market value. The actual tax rate is $3.48 per $100 of assessed valuation.

Falls Church.-Average effective tax rate of $1.527 per $100 of current market value. The actual tax rate is $3.15 per $100 of assessed valuation.

District of Columbia

Personal Property

Effective and actual rate of $2.20 per $100 of current market value on tangible personal property used in business. Assessment level is at market value. Household property and motor vehicles not stock-in-trade of dealers are exempted.

Maryland

Montgomery County.—Average effective rate of $2.11 per $100 of current market value of tangible personal property used in business. Effective rates vary from $1.77 to $2.45 depending upon the location of the property. Actual rates vary from $2.95 to $4.09 per $100 of assessed valuation. Town rates applicable in specific areas are excluded, Maryland law requires that business inventories be assessed at 60% of acquisition cost for county tax purposes. Assessed values for other than county tax purposes are not subject to this limitation.

Prince Georges County.-Average effective rate of $2.001 per $100 of current market value of tangible personal property used in business. Effective rates vary from $1.90 to $2.10 depending upon the location of the property. Actual rates vary from $3.17 to $3.50 per $100 of assessed valuation. Town rates applicable in specific areas are excluded. Maryland law requires that business inventories to be assessed at 60% of acquisition cost for county tax purposes. Assessed values for other than county tax purposes are not subject to this limitation.

1 County Council has not set rates to date for fiscal year 1968.

« ForrigeFortsett »