 | 1917 - 1220 sider
...respecting liability as between employer and employe, without providing a reasonably just substitute. * * * It perhaps may be doubted whether the state could...here presented, and we intimate no opinion upon it." Discussing the particular features of the case at some length, the court then says: "Much emphasis... | |
 | 1917 - 1332 sider
...between employer and employé, without providing a reasonably just substitute. * * * It perhaps may bo doubted whether the state could abolish all rights...here presented, and we intimate no opinion upon it." Discussing the particular features of the case at some length, the court then says: "Much emphasis... | |
 | Ralph Harrub Blanchard - 1917 - 418 sider
...to change the law of negligence, though opinion was reserved on the question whether the legislature "could abolish all rights of action on the one hand,...without setting up something adequate in their stead." The question considered was "whether the method of compensation that is established as a substitute... | |
 | 1917 - 1348 sider
...respecting liability as between employer and employé, without providing a reasonably just substitute. * * * It perhaps may be doubted whether the state could abolish all rights of action, on the oue hand, or all defenses, on the other, without setting up something adequate in their stead. No such... | |
 | Westel Woodbury Willoughby, John Archibald Fairlie, Frederic Austin Ogg - 1918 - 808 sider
...made it clear that the court was passing on the particular statute before it, and was not deciding "whether the state could abolish all rights of action,...without setting up something adequate in their stead." In New York Central R. Co. v. White,19 which sustained the New York statute, the opinion compared the... | |
 | Arizona. Supreme Court - 1919 - 700 sider
...of the statutes thus sustained there were reasons rendering the particular departures appropriate. Nor is it necessary, for the purposes of the present...here presented, and we intimate no opinion upon it." (Italics mine.) There is an intimation here that even the common-law defenses of negligence of a fellow-servant,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Joint Committee on Atomic Energy - 1975 - 852 sider
...any rule of law en titling him to insist that it shall remain unchanged for his benefit • • • [It] perhaps may be doubted whether the state could...No such question is here presented, and we intimate DO • •pinion upon it. The statute under consideration sets aside one body of roles only to establish... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1975 - 960 sider
...respecting liability as between employer and employee icithout providing a reasonably just substitute. * * * It perhaps may be doubted whether the state could...in their stead. No such question is here presented * * *. The statute under consideration sets aside one body of rules only to establish another system... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce - 1975 - 668 sider
...respecting liability as between employer and employee without providing a reasonably just substitute, * * * It perhaps may be doubted whether the state could...in their stead. No such question is here presented. * * * The statute under consideration sets another system in its place. The White case stands for the... | |
| |
Nor is it necessary, for the purposes of the present case, to say that a State might, without violence to the constitutional guaranty of "due process of law," suddenly set aside all common-law rules respecting liability as between employer and employee,... 
