Reports of Cases Decided in the Court of Appeals of the State of New York, Volum 73New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Samuel Hand, Edward Jordan Dimock, Hiram Edward Sickels, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1879 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 92
Side 5
... person , believing and having a right to believe that the act was within the authority , has acted or refrained from acting in reliance thereon , and would sustain damage if the act of the agent was not considered that of the principal ...
... person , believing and having a right to believe that the act was within the authority , has acted or refrained from acting in reliance thereon , and would sustain damage if the act of the agent was not considered that of the principal ...
Side 10
... persons must suffer from the act of a third person , he shall sustain the loss who has enabled the third person to do the injury . If , however , a person dealing with an agent knows that he is acting under a circumscribed and limited ...
... persons must suffer from the act of a third person , he shall sustain the loss who has enabled the third person to do the injury . If , however , a person dealing with an agent knows that he is acting under a circumscribed and limited ...
Side 26
... person in the office of judge of the ecclesiastical court in England , excommunicated one for refusing to obey an order made by him , that he become guardian ad litem for an infant son , and though the order was made in a matter then ...
... person in the office of judge of the ecclesiastical court in England , excommunicated one for refusing to obey an order made by him , that he become guardian ad litem for an infant son , and though the order was made in a matter then ...
Side 27
... person assumed to do the act as judge , he had judicial jurisdiction of the person acted upon , and of the subject - matter as to which it was done . Jurisdiction of the person is when the citizen acted upon is before the judge , either ...
... person assumed to do the act as judge , he had judicial jurisdiction of the person acted upon , and of the subject - matter as to which it was done . Jurisdiction of the person is when the citizen acted upon is before the judge , either ...
Side 28
... persons , and he had jurisdiction of the sub- ject - matter , and his error was a judicial error ; an act done quatenus judge ; not an act as Howell , the private person , though it was an act contrary to law , grievous and oppressive ...
... persons , and he had jurisdiction of the sub- ject - matter , and his error was a judicial error ; an act done quatenus judge ; not an act as Howell , the private person , though it was an act contrary to law , grievous and oppressive ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Reports of Cases, Volum 102 New York (State). Court of Appeals,George Franklin Comstock,Henry Rogers Selden,Francis Kernan,Hiram Edward Sickels Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1886 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action was brought adverse possession agent agreement alleged ALLEN amount ANDREWS APPEAL from judgment appellant April 16 Argued April assignment authority bank Barb bond chap charge CHURCH claim complaint concur consent contract corporation county treasurer court of equity creditors damages debt decided April deed defendant defendant's delivered EARL entitled evidence Ex parte Lange ex rel executed FOLGER granted held indorsed intended interest issued judge Judgment affirmed judicial department jurisdiction jury land liable lien loss March 19 March 26 ment MILLER mortgage mortgagor negligence Opinion owner paid Paige parties payment person possession premises proceedings property insured provision question RAPALLO Raritan bay receipt received recover referee replevin respondent reversed SICKELS.-VOL Special Term Statement Staten Island statute subrogation supra Supreme Court thereof tion trial trustee valid void Wend XXVIII Yates county
Populære avsnitt
Side 143 - ... this insurance, as to the interest of the mortgagee (or trustee) only therein, shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner...
Side 33 - But where jurisdiction over the subject-matter is invested by law in the judge, or in the court which he holds, the manner and extent in which the jurisdiction shall be exercised are generally as much questions for his determination as any other questions involved in the case, although upon the correctness of his determination in these particulars the validity of his judgments may depend.
Side 23 - ... and at the same time, and as a part of the same judicial act and order, passed judgment anew upon the plaintiff, and resentenced him to be imprisoned for the term of one year.
Side 454 - If the part to be performed by one party consists of several distinct and separate items, and the price to be paid by the other is apportioned to each Item to be performed, or is left to be implied by law, such a contract will generally be held to be severable...
Side 481 - ... shall be considered as a net single premium of temporary insurance, and the term for which it will insure shall be determined according to the age of the party at the time of the lapse of premium, and the assumptions of mortality and interest aforesaid.
Side 25 - ... judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts, even when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly.
Side 68 - No milk which is watered, adulterated, reduced or changed in any respect by the addition of water or other substance, or by the removal of cream, shall be brought into...
Side 100 - Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the Fourth Judicial Department, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial without a jury (reported below, 14 Hun, 396).
Side 143 - ... under all the securities held as collateral to the mortgage debt to the extent of such payment, but such subrogation shall not impair the right of the mortgagee to recover the full amount of his claim...
Side 104 - That the trustees deliberately, and with knowledge of the real value of the property, overvalued it and paid in stock for it an amount which they knew was in excess of its actual value.