 It need not have been foreseen or or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence.  Wisconsin Reports - Side 343av Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold, Arnold LeBell - 1916Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1918 - 720 sider
...comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work...incidental to the character of the business and not imlepend- . ent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected,... | |
 | 1921 - 510 sider
...said to arise out of, and be incident to, the employment. The rule adopted by some of the courts that, "the causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood/' is therefore not strictly correct. Acts Personal to the Employee — Injunemay arise out of the employment,... | |
 | 1915 - 1228 sider
...comes from a ha/,;ird to which the workman would have been equally exposed, apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work...the relation of master and servant. It need not have hoen foreseen or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected... | |
 | 1920 - 1156 sider
...which th« workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative Jauger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the...be incidental to the character of the business and cot independent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected,... | |
 | 1918 - 1228 sider
...different language, In Ютbol v. Industrial Accident Commission, supra, a part of the statement being: "The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood." When measured by the standards set down in these cases, it is not difficult to satisfactorily conclude... | |
 | 1918 - 1212 sider
...497, 102 NE 697, LR A. 1910A, 30G; Bryant v. Fissell, 84 NJ Law, 72, 86 Atl. 458. "It [the accident] need not have been foreseen or expected, but after the event it must nppar to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment and to have (lowed from that source... | |
 | 1920 - 960 sider
...comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work,...It need not have been foreseen or expected ; but, afU-r the event, it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and... | |
 | 1916 - 1132 sider
...comes from a hazanl to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work,...expected, but after the event it must appear to have li:id its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have Sowed from that source as a rational... | |
 | Connecticut - 1917 - 1198 sider
...compensation. This case also lays down the principle that the hazard which gives rise to compensation must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood. That the Act may benefit one doing something not in the strict line of his duty but incidental to his... | |
 | 1918 - 1348 sider
...business. Pursuing the same subject In the McNicol Case, supra, the court said: "It [the accident] need not have been foreseen or expected, but after...the event it must appear to have had its origin in the risk connected with the employment, and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence."... | |
| |
