 Bay for a rule, to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding Col. Hunt to deliver him his commission. Justice Bay dismissed the motion. The relator appealed. His case, and that of M' Daniel, were argued before the Court of Appeals,...  The American Historical Review - Side 116redigert av - 1902Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1917 - 840 sider
...Satterthwaite. For the respondents, Frank Bergen.' PER CURJAM. On April 29th, 1915, the relator obtained a rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue commanding the respondents to complete the construction of a street railway; under which rule each party took... | |
 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1921 - 664 sider
...justice of this court for, and obtained the present rule, which call's upon the mayor and councilmen to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue commanding and enjoining them to "nominate., ratify and confirm the relator as sole soldier applicant for the... | |
 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1916 - 848 sider
...Holt Ap<jar and Frank Bergen. The opinion of the court was delivered by TRENCHARD. J. This is a rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue commanding the respondents 88 NJL Hamilton Twp. v. Merwr Co. Traction Co. forthwith to complete the construction... | |
 | Richard Burn - 1831 - 1094 sider
...Where overseers' Casberd obtained a rule in Mich. T. last, calling upon the defendants "^"dwnfu'i, to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding the last day, that them to cause continuances to be entered to the then next general quarter •»... | |
 | William Laxton - 1841 - 534 sider
...Bench, November 15.— Sir F. Pollock applied for a rule, calling or: toe 3rand Junction Railway Company to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding them to obey the enactments of the 19th secJon of the Act3 Victoria, cap. 49, which was as follows... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1838 - 850 sider
...Runkle v. Winemiller and others, 4 Harris & M'Henry, 448. That case came before the court on a motion to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding the defendants to restore the Rev. William Runkel into the place and functions of minister of a certain... | |
 | 1841 - 502 sider
...BRISTOL. — Parish Clerks. — A rule was granted in Hilary term last, requiring the Rev. Francis Close to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding him to restore John Board to the office of parish clerk of Cheltenham, from which he had been removed.... | |
 | 1841 - 902 sider
...— Sir Frederick Pollock applied for a rule calling upon the directors of the Grand Junction Railway to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding them to comply with the provisions of the Act of Parliament 3 Victoria, c. 49, sec. 26, which enacts,... | |
 | Edmund Burke - 1841 - 928 sider
...— Sir Frederick Pollock applied for a rule calling upon the directors of the Grand Junction Railway to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding them to comply with the provisions of the Act of Parliament 3 Victoria, c. 49, sec. 26, which enacts,... | |
 | John Monson Carrow - 1845 - 784 sider
...Order of Sessions confirmed. The QUEEN v. LANGHORNE. J.HIS was a rule calling upon Edward Langhorne to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding him to deliver over to the overseers of the poor of the township of Old Hutton and Holme Scales, in... | |
| |
