of the parties, that the ship should unload her cargo at St. Thomas; and this was a condition precedent to the charterparty taking effect. The time of her get- ting to Duminica must have depended on the finishing of the outward bound voyage. She might as well have gone to the East Indies before she went to Do- minica, if this was not a condition precedent. The crop at Dominica must be loaded so as to be brought home by a particular time. The plaintiff might have lost his freight for staying so long before he came to Dominica. Bulst. 169. The words here operate as a condition precedent, and the plaintiff has no ground of action.
SED PER CURIAM. This is no condition precedent. But at all events, if the ship had not arrived in time, the defendant should have objected to load; instead of which, he or his agents take to the ship; they declare that the ship shall load at Dominica; they keep her on demurrage; therefore they cannot now make the objection.
3. Where defendant pleads in abatement, he must be prepared to prove his plea prompt- ly; and a strong case must be made out before the court will postpone the time, in order to enable the defendant to procure the evidence of witnesses. Wade v. Bir- mingham.
4. The defendant being arrested by a wrong name, informed the plaintiff's attorney of the error, and afterwards, before the de- claration was delivered, pleaded in abate- ment; next day plaintiff declared in the defendant's right name, and the latter having omitted to plead de novo, the plain- tiff signed judgment as for want of a plea; held that the judgment was regularly signed. Douglas v. Green.
5. Pleas in abatement cannot be filed before defendant has appeared, there being no distinction in this respect between pleas in abatement and pleas in bar; and there- fore judgment may be signed for want of a plea, though plea in abatement has been filed, if defendant has not appeared. Wake- field v. Marden.
See MASTER AND SERVANT, 2.
If, in the prosecution of a lawful act, an injury, purely accidental, ensue, no acion can be supported for an injury arising from such accident. Davies v. Saunders and others. Page 539
ACCORD AND SATISFACTION.
See PLEADING, 11, 13.
ACCOUNT (ACTION OF).
Two principal officers of court appointed au- ditors on motion, in an action of account. Smith v. Smith. 10
Account, action for not rendering of, see PRINCIPAL and AGENT.
ACT OF PARLIAMENT. See CONVICTION, 2.
Effect, &c. of, see PLEADING, 38.
See ACCOUNT. ASSUMPSIT. CASE. COVE- NANT. DEBT. PENAL ACTION. QUITAM. TROVER. TRESPASS. PLEading. Par- TIES TO ACTION. SETTING ASIDE PRO- CEEDINGS. NOTICE OF ACTION.
If action be prematurely brought before cause of action accrued, the court will, on a summary application, set aside the pro- ceedings, though such objection would afford no defence on the trial. Kerr v. Dick, 11
that the account had been settled at a much smaller sum. Jackson v. Tomkins. Page 20
See PRINCIPAL AND AGENT. AFFIDAVIT, 6. ATTORNEY, 7. BILLS OF EXCHANGE, 6. SET-OFF, 1. ADMINISTRATION.
See CONTRACT. PLEADING, 22. STAMP, 2. TRADE, 1, 2. VENDOR AND P.
ALLOCATUR.
See ATTACHMENT, 3.
See BILLS OF EXCHANGE, 4, 5, 6.
See ABATEMENT, 2. EJECTMENT, 10. PLEADING, 1, 12, 23, 30. POSTEA. PRO- CESS, 2.
1. Nisi Prius roll amended, by inserting a special title to a declaration, defendant having appeared after he came of age, which was after the first day of term. Boys v. Edmeads.
2. Amendment allowed in qui tam action, by correcting an error in declaration, in the description of the persons to whom part of the penalty was given, though defend- ant had pleaded early enough for plaintiff to have gone to trial after an issuable term; and plaintiff had neglected to do so, and had delayed making up the issue till a subsequent term. Solomons v. Jex- kins. 23 3. Rule to shew cause at chambers, why judgment, entered by mistake on a war- rant of attorney (for a less sum than the sum secured by the warrant of attorney), should not be amended, will not be grant- ed on consent of an attorney who was em- ployed by both parties, but there must be some other person authorized. Anon. 24. 4. A record may be amended in a penal ac- tion, by inserting a similiter, though the objection was taken at the trial. Wright q. t. v. Horton.
5. If, on an issue on nil tiel record, there is a variance, the court will permit amend- ment, on payment of costs. Doubleday v. 6. After trial, and verdict for the plaintiff, defendant allowed to amend pleas and have a new trial, on payment of costs. Storer v. Gordon. 27
7. Amendment allowed after nonsuit, where
fresh action otherwise barred by statute of limitations. Dartnall v. Howard and an- other. Page 28 8. Order of nisi prius refused to be amended according to the terms contained in a paper, signed by the counsel at the trial, the intention of the parties appearing from their subsequent acts to have been in fa- vour of the terms of the order. Pearman v. Carter. 9. Where a plea was pleaded to the whole declaration, but the matter of the plea was in truth but an answer to part, and á ver- dict was obtained and judgment given for the plaintiff, and a writ of error brought, the court refused to allow an amendment in the record, by inserting judgment by nil dicit for the part unanswered, on the ground that such amendment was unne- cessary. Paterson v. Everard.
1. On judgment by default, in covenant for arrears of an annuity, the court will grant a rule for reference to the Master, to com- pute arrears. Allwoway v. Hill, 32 2. On a motion to set aside an annuity, af- ter a great lapse of time, on the ground of a mistatement of the consideration, the affidavits should state that the parties are alive. Amstead v. Atkins.
32 3. Judgment on warrant of attorney to se cure annuity, set aside, because there was no memorial, though it was omitted at the request of the grantor; but the court re- fused to take the warrant of attorney off the file. Anonymous.
1. Rule refused on motion to set aside an award, on the ground that the submission had been obtained by fraud: the applica- tion should have been made to set aside the order. Where the submission has been obtained by fraud, that may be given in evidence, under a plea of non assumpsit, or nil debet. Sackett v. Owen. 2. An agreement stamp is not necessary to arbitration bond, containing, besides the usual covenants, an agreement as to pay- ment of costs. Trustees of insolvent debtors, entering into arbitration bond, admit that they have assets, and may be directed to pay costs. In Re Wansborough and another v. Dyer.
4. An award, that money shall be paid to a stranger for the use of one of the parties to the submission, sufficient. Court will not set aside an award, on the ground that one of the parties had become bankrupt before the making of the award. If mo- tion for setting aside an award be made on slight grounds, the rule will be dis- charged with costs. Snook v. Hellyer. 43 5. Award, in an action for not repairing, made by arbitrators, upon view of the pre- mises, without calling the parties before them, will be set aside. Anon.
44 6. Rule granted to set aside an award, on application of party in whose favour it was made, it appearing that a sum had been omitted by mistake. Anon. 44 7. Where arbitrator has power to make ap- plication to the court for enlargement of the time. Anon.
8. If, after reference by bond, one of several of the obligees dies before award made, the arbitrators cannot award a payment to the survivors and executors of deceased; and that they shall release obligors.-Qu. If the award would have been good, if made on surviving obligees only. Ed- munds and others v. Cox and others. 432
1. King's servants. Lighter of the fires and candles to the king's yeoman of guards, held entitled to be discharged out of cus- tody on filing common bail, it being sworn that defendant had sometimes executed the duties of his office in person, though they were in general performed by deputy. Forster v. Hopkins. 2. Court refused to discharge Major of the Tower out of custody, on the ground that he was arrested when returning from an attendance on the Prince Regent, it not appearing that he had been attending by the command of his Royal Highness. If an officer is privileged from arrest by his warrant or commission, such warrant should be shewn to the court. Where there were contradictory affidavits as to the place where the defendant was arrest- ed, court refused to discharge him, on the ground that the privilege of the place made the arrest illegal. Arrests cannot be made within the Tower. Batson v. McLean. 48 3. An arrest within the Tower would be bad; but the Deputy Governor is not privileged as such. Batson v. M'Lean.
4. The court will not discharge the defend- ant on his filing common bail, unless he make out a clear case to entitle him to such discharge, and the defendant will be left to his plea.-Qu. How far the cessio bonorum discharges a debt contracted in Guernsey. Whittingham v. De La Rieu. 53 5. The court will not discharge the defend- ant out of custody on filing common bail, on the ground of his having become bank- rupt and obtained his certificate in Bremen, where the debt was contracted. v. Languishe.
See BAIL, 71. EVIDENCE, 6. VENUE, 1.
ASSIGNEES OF BANKRUPT. See TRIAL, 2. BANKRUPT, 27.
ASSIGNEE OF LEASE.
1. The assignee of a lease is not liable to the original lessor, for a breach of cove- nant not running with the land, unless he
See BAIL, 68. WARRANT OF ATTORNEY, 1.
See ATTORNEY, 5, 6. BAIL, 6, 55. COSTS, 14. EVIDENCE, 11. REG. GEN. 5, 13. SHERIFF, 1, 2. SUBPŒNA. FOREIGN ATTACHMENT.
1. Where the plaintiff sued out an original against the defendant in his wrong name, the præcipe being right, and defendant put in bail in his right name, court set aside attachment obtained against the sheriff for not bringing in the body, but without costs on either side. Boswell v. Atkins. 56 2. The report of Master of the Crown Office, that a defendant and his attorney are in contempt, for not obeying an award and filing bail, is to be taken as a conviction; and on defendant's being brought up for judgment, the court will not receive aff- davits in denial of the contempt, but only in mitigation of punishment. Coulson v. Graham.
57 3. The rule for an attachment for nonpay- ment of money in pursuance of an alloca tur, is only a rule nisi, when the allocatur is founded on an award. Rer v. —. 57 4. Attachment against sheriff not set aside on the ground of delay, unless there have been gross laches on the part of the plain- tiff, to the prejudice of the sheriff. Rex v. Sheriffs of London, in a cause of Hobhouse v. Middleditch. 58
See AGENT. AUCTIONEER. APPEARANCE, 2. BAIL, 6, 52. EJECTMENT, 20, 25, 35. PLEADING, 17. SETTING ASIDE PROCEEDINGS, 6. UNDERTAKING.
1. A clerk, in order to be admitted an attor- ney, must actually serve five years under articles; therefore where a clerk had serv- ed part of his time with a master who had left the country, and before his articles
« ForrigeFortsett » |