New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company et al., Harvard Company v.

PAGE.

. 212

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company et
al., W. S. King & Company v.
New York, Ontario and Western Railway Company et
al., Hulbert H. Warner v..
New York, Pennsylvania & Ohio Railroad Company et
al., Andrews Soap Company v. .
New York, Pennsylvania & Ohio Railroad Company et
al., New York Board of Trade and Transportation
et al. v.

New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad Company
et al., Delaware State Grange of Patrons of Hus-
bandry v..

251

32

41

. 447

. 588

Northern Pacific Railroad Company et al., New York
Board of Trade and Transportation et al. v.

. 447

Ohio, Indiana & Western Railway Company et al.,
Hervey Bates et al. v.

Ohio & Mississippi Railway Company et al., Andrews
Soap Company v.

Pennsylvania Company et al., Hervey Bates et al. v.
Pennsylvania Company et al., Harvard Company v.
Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al., Beaver & Com-

pany v.
Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al., Boston Fruit and
Produce Exchange v.

Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al., Delaware State
Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry v.
Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al., Harvard Com-

pany v.

Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al., New York Board
of Trade and Transportation et al r..
Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al., Hervey Bates et

281

41

. 281

212

. 733

664

588

. 212

447

281

al. v.. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al., Proctor & Gamble v. 87, 443 Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al., Hulbert H. War

ner v..

32

Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Company et al., Hul-
bert H. Warner v.
Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Company et al., New

PAGE.

32

588

York Board of Trade and Transportation et al. v. 447 Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad Company et al., Delaware State Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Company et al., Andrews Soap Company v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Company et al., Beaver & Company v. .

41

733

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Company et al., New York Board of Trade and Transportation et al. v. 447 Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Company et al. Proctor & Gamble v. 87, 443 Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Company et al., New York Board of Trade and Transportation et al. v. . Poughkeepsie Iron Company v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company et al. Proctor & Gamble v. Cincinnati, Hamilton and Dayton Railroad Company et al.

447

195

87, 443

Rice, George v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad
Company et al. .
Rice, Robinson & Witherop v. Western New York &
Pennsylvania Railroad Company

St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company et al., San
Bernardino Board of Trade v.
St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company et al.,
Kauffman Milling Company v.
St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Company et al.,
Kauffman Milling Company v..

228

131

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company et al., New York Board of Trade and Transportation et al. v.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company et al., George Rice v..

PAGE.

San Antonio and Aransas Pass Railway Company et al.,

Kauffman Milling Company v.

San Bernardino Board of Trade v. Atchison, Topeka &
Santa Fe Railroad Company et al.
San Francisco Chamber of Commerce et al. v. Pennsyl-
vania Railroad Company et al. .
Shamberg, Jacob v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western
Railroad Company et al.
Shreveport & Houston Railway Company et al., Kauff-
man Milling Company v.
Smith, Orland et al. Receivers, Cincinnati, Washington
& Baltimore Railroad Company et al., Proctor &
Gamble v..

417

104

447

630

417

87, 443

Squire, John P. & Company v. Michigan Central Railroad
Company et al. .

Southern Pacific Company et al., Lehmann, Higginson &
Company v.

.

Southern Pacific Company et al., Kauffman Milling Company v.

611

1

Southern Pacific Company et al., New York Board of
Trade and Transportation et al. v.
Southern Pacific Company et al., George Rice v.

.

Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., Kauffman Milling Company v. .

Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., Lehmann, Higginson & Company v.

Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., New York
Board of Trade and Transportation et al. v.
Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., George Rice v. 228
Texas Central Railway Company et al., Kauffman Mill-

ing Company v.

417

Texas, Sabine Valley & Northwhstern Railway Company

et al., Kauffman Milling Company v. Texas Trunk Railroad Company et al., Kauffman Milling Company v

417

. 417

Union Pacific Railway Company et al., Beaver & Com

pany .

. 733

PAGE.

Union Pacific Railway Company et al., Lehmann, Higginson & Company v.

1

447

Union Pacific Railway Company et al., New York Board of Trade and Transportation et al. v. Union Pacific Railway Company et al., George Rice v. 228

158

Valley Railway Company et al., Harvard Company v. 212
Wabash Railroad Company et al., Beaver & Company v. 733
Wabash Railroad Company et al., Board of Trade of
City of Chicago v.
Wabash Railroad Company et al., New York Board of
Trade and Transportation et al. v.
Warner, Hulbert H. v. New York Central & Hudson
River Railroad Company et al.
Western Classification Committee, James McMillan &
Company v.

McMillan

Western New York & Pennsylvania Railroad Company,
Rice, Robinson & Witherop v.

West Shore Railroad Company et al., New York Board of Trade and Transportation et al. v.

West Shore Railroad Company et al., Hulbert H. War

Western & Atlantic Railroad Company et al., James
Mayer Buggy Company v.

447

32

276

131

447

xvi

TABLE OF CASES CITED.

PAGE.

Aberdeen Commercial Company v. Great North of Scotland Railway Company, 3 Ry, and Can. Traf. Cas. 205, 315 American Wire Nail Company v. Queen & Crescent Fast Freight Line, 3 I. C. C. Rep. 224,

520

Andrews Soap Company v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Company et al., 4 I. C. C. Rep. 41, . 742 Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company v. Denver & New Orleans Railroad Company, 110 U. S. 667; (28 L. Ed. 291),.

Baxendale v. Great Western Railway Company, 1 Nev. &
MacN. 202,

Milw

Boards of Trade Union, etc., v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St.

Paul Railway Company, 1 I. C. C. Rep. 251,
Boston, Concord, etc. Railroad Company v. State, 32 N.
H. 215,

Brennan. Tracy, 2 Mo. App. 540, .

Bullard. Northern Pacific Railroad Company, 9 Montana, (3 Inters. Com Rep. 536),

273

316

83

414

415

. 316

Business Men's Association of the State of Minnesota v.
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway, 2
I. C. C. Rep. 52, 65, 67. 68, . . 86, 151, 187, 208, 261

.718, 726

Capehart et al. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company et al., 4 I. C. C. Rep. 278, . Chamber of Commerce of the City of Milwaukee v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad Company et al., 2 I. C. C. Rep. 553, . 677 Commonwealth e. Central Bridge Company, 12 Cush. 242, 414 Commonwealth e. New Bedford Bridge Company, 2 Gray,

339, .

414

Commonwealth e. Vermont, etc., Railroad Company, 4

Gray 22,

414