Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

Page.

483

20

148

8

48 470 522 194 547 82

295
217

32

490
257

223
250
288
520
180

Hunter, Benson v.....
Illinois, State of (Cook County).
Ingalls, Dennis v..
Indian Lands....
Iowa, Linn County
Iverson, O. P.....
Jackson, Campbell v. (on re-

view)...
James v. Koons.
Jameson, Dobie v.
Jay, Parrish v.....
Jenkins et al. v. Dreyfus...
Johns v. Judge et al
Johnson, South v. (on review)..
Johnson et al., Bannister v...
Johnson, Littlepage v
Jones, Dallas v......
Jones, Egert v. (on review)...
Jones v. Southern Pacific R. R.

Co Jones, Standley v..... Jossart et al., Daniels v. Jupiter, Fort.... Kay v. Kay.... Kellogg, Moore v. (on review).. Keslik, St. Paul, Minneapolis

and Manitoba Ry. Co. v...... Kesling, F. B. Keystone Lumber Co., Telford

et al. v. (on review)
Kime v. Smith...
King et al. v. Gunnels
King, Smith 1...
Kingsbury, Poyntz v.
Koepcke, Hilton t...
Koons, James v....
La Chappelle v. Ross (on review).
Lake, Fannie D. (on review)...
Lake Malheur...
Larson, Northern Pacific R. R.

Co. v....
Lauzon, Pierre....
Lemmons, Lawson H.....
Lindstrom, Patterson et al. v
Linn County, Iowa
Littlepage v. Johnson.
Logan, Murphy v.
Lutz, Atlantic, Gulf and West

India Transit Co. v..
Lynch, Parker et al. v..
Maley, Boyd v...
Malheur Lake..
Malka, Young r.
Marston, James A

Page.

290 Martenson, Nikolai ... 581 Martin, Hastings and Dakota 163 Ry. Co. v

24 Marquette, Houghton and Onto126

nagon R. R. Co. et al., Daily v. 457 Mason, Young v.

Mather et al. r. Hackley's Heirs

(on review) 277 266

Maxcy, James

Mayfield, O'Gorman v.... 91

McClure v. Sullivan's Heirs..... 405

McDonald et al. r. Hartman et al. 272

McDonnell, Grant v. (on review). 268 458

McGregor et al. v. Quinn (on re

view)... 509

McIlroy v. Towle 312

McNamara v. Orr et al. (on re125

view) 293

Merrill, California and Oregon

Land Co. v...... 270

Michigan, State of..... 104

Michigan, State of, Power's 191

Heirs v. 477

Miller v. Bowe-et al. (on review). 6

Miller v. Sebastian... 446

Miller, Smith v.

Minnesota, State of, v. Putten... 275 Missouri, Kansas and Texas Ry. 43

Co. v. Troxell (on review)....

Mitchell, Bagley v. 141 Moccettini, State of California v. 207

Mock, Hazzard v 488

Monitor Lode (on review).. 382

Moore v. Kellogg (on review)... 231

Morris, George A. (on review)... 220

Morrow et al. v. State of Oregon 266

et al. (on review)...... 590 Moses, Pack r..... 580 | Moss, Dowman v. 439 Mothershead, State of Oregon

et al.v.... 233 Mott v. Coffman... 297 Muller v. Coleman (on review)..

37 Murphy 1. Logan... 501 Musser-Sauntry Co.,Pierce et al.v. 126

Narboe, P. M.... 312

Niles, Reith v. 478 Vix v. Simon...

Nolan, Smith v 11 Northey et al., Snow v... 384 Northern Pacific R. R. Co .... 570 Northern Pacific R. R. Co., Bar439 den et al. v 210 Northern Pacific R. R.Co., v. Benz 577

et al..

288
419
359
166

76
446
11

254 360 526

63 106 473 478 136 301 449

85 117 496 281

188

229 Page.

108 546 211

re

Northern Pacific R. R. Co., v.

Chase ..... Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v.

Davis .... Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Eb

erhard Northern Pacific R. R. Co., Flood

et al, v..... Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Lar.

588

386 573 513 2+1

son

136

12 435

9 308 195

223 231 167 175 472 180

Page.

Paugh, Silveria v. (on review).. 225 Payne, Cyrus A

Peacock v. Shearer's Heirs
87 Pence v. Gourley et al.) on

Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v.

Olson .... Northern Pacific R. R. Co., Rey

nolds v Northern Pacific R. R. Co.,

Rinda v Northern Pacific R. R. Co. et al.

t'. St. Joseph's Roman Catholic

Mission ... Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. St.

Paul, Minneapolis and Mani

toba Ry. Co .... Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v.

Tripp. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v.

White.... Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Vio

lette.... Norton, Union Pacific Ry. Co. v.

(on review).... Noyo Lumber Co... O'Gorman v. Mayfield. Olson, Northern Pacific R. R.

Co. v Ontonagon and Brule River R.

R. Co Oregon, State of (on review).... Oregon, State of, et al. v. Mothers

head Oregon, State of, et al., Morrow

295 201 417 354 505 449

459
571
482
421
316
175
184

256 Page.

.....m

view)
532 Pensacola and Louisville R. R.

Co......
227 Phillips v. Breazeale's Heirs....

Phinney, Anway v.
233 Pickard r. Cooley

Pierce et al. v. Musser-Sauntry 95 Co.

Pierce, Stinchfield v 459 Pierse v. Carthrae

Piper, Swineford et al. 7... 184 Port Angeles Townsite..

Porter, Dreesen v...

Power's Heirs, State of Michi196 gan v....

Poyntz v. Kingsbury

Price, Falconer v...
395 Price v. Riley et al

Prouty v. Condit
516 Putten v. State of Minnesota....

Quinn, McGregor et al. v. (on
452

review)

Rancho Buena Vista..... 28

Rancho Canada del Corral..

Rand, Duncan v.. 524

Rehart, S. V
432

Reith v. Niles
522 Reynolds v. Northern Pacific

R. R. Co.....
95 Rhea, Thornton v

| Rhinehart, Carr v
307 Rickers v. Tisher
290 Riddell v. Hanson's Heirs......

Riley et al., Price v
63 Rindav. Northern Pacific R. R. Co

Rio Grande Dam and Irrigation
254

Co......

Roberts r. Oregon Central. Mili591 tary Road Co...

Rogers' Heirs et al., Da Cambra v.
422 Ross, Lachapelle v. (on review).

Russell v. Haggin (on review)...
32 Saint, Joseph E. et al
256 Sampsel, Weed v
360 Sampson, David....
316 Sanders r. Parker (on review)..
384 | Schweitzer u. Hilliard et al ....
581 Searles et al., United States v..
371 Sebastian, Miller v
405 Settoon 1. Tschirn.
501 | Shafer, Batters v

et al. v. (on review).
Oregon Central Military Road

Co., Roberts v
Oregon and California R. R. Co.

v. Small
Orr et al., McNamara v. (on re-

view)
Owens v. Gauger (on review)....
Pack v. Moses
Palmer 1. Stillman (on review)..
Parker et al. v. Lynch.....
Parker, Sanders r. (on review)..
Parrish, Hagler v.
Parrish v. Jay
Patterson et al. v. Lindstrom ....

1

591 236 590

83 326 461 279 584 294 258 288

1 111

275

395

531

9

407

141 282

37 571 123 396 421

356

249 511 475 217

Page. Shafer •. Butler .....

486 St. Paul, Minneapolis and ManiShearer's Heirs, Peacock v... 211 toba Ry. Co. v. Keslik........ Shimer, Bender v.

363 St. Paul, Minneapolis and ManiShugren et al. v. Dillman ...

453 toba Ry. Co., Northern Pacific Silveria v. Paugh (on reviev)... 108 R. R. Co.v... Simon, Nix v

85 St. Paul, Minneapolis and ManiSimonton, James ..

42 toba Ry. Co. v. Stickney...... Simpson, Bergelan v...

425 Sullivan's Heirs, McClure v.. Sipchen r. Cyr et al...

110 Sutphin v. Gower (on review).. Small, Oregon and California

Swineford et al. r. Piper...... R. R. Co. v...

422

Taylor v. Henry Smith, Frank

243

Telford et al. v. Keystone LumSmith v. Gleason.

484

ber Co. (on review) Smith, Kime v...

207

Thompson, Gaby v..... Smith v. King

382

Thompson, Fleming v. (on reSmith v. Miller..

520

view) Smith v. Nolan

117

Thornton v. Rhea Smuggler Mining Co. et al. v.

Tiensvold v. Bell Trueworthy Lode Claim et al.

Tierra Amarilla Grant.. Sneed, Ellis v. (on review)..... 584

Tisher, Rickers v Snider, Walker v. (on review).. 467

Titamore r. Southern Pacific R. Snow v. Northey et al.......

496

R. Co. (on review)....... Somers v. Heuer...

507

Tobin, Cuddy v South v. Johnson (on review)... 458

Todd, Gary v. (on review)...... Southern Pacific R.R.Co.,Jones v. 270

Towle, Mcllroy v Southern Pacific R.R. Co., Tita

Tripp, Northern Pacific R. R. more v. (on review)..

249

Co. v.. Standley v. Jones...

104

Troxell, Missouri, Kansas and Stanfield, Calvin A

286

Texas Ry. Co. v. (on review).. Stanton et al. v. Constantine

160

Trueworthy Lode Claim et al., State of California

244, 585

Smuggler Mining Co., et al. v. State of California v. Moccettini. 359

Tschirn, Settoon v
State of Florida..

Tucker et al. v. Florida Ry. and
State of Illinois (Cook County). 581
State of Michigan.....

Navigation Co......

257 State of Michigan v. Power's

Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. Norton Heirs

223

(on review)... State of Minnesota, Putten v

180

United States et al. v. Hanley et State of Oregon (on review)

290

al.... State of Oregon et al., Morrow et

United States v. Searles et al.... al. r. (on review)....

254 State of Oregon et al. v. Mother

Valley, Josephine et al.. shead

Vaughn, James L State of Wisconsin

518

Villa, Cooke v. (on review). Staver, Samuel W

495

Violette, Northern Pacific R. R. Stewart v. Doll (on review).....

464 Stillman, Palmer v. (on review). 316 Wait, Bradley v Stinchfield v. Pierce

12 Waldron, Black Tomahawk v... Strutz v. Crabb..

122 Walker v. Snider (on review).. Stryker et al. v. Brinkley..

503 Wallace v. Woodruff St. Joseph's Roman Catholic Mis

Walsh, Cooper v.. sion, Northern Pacific R. R. Co.

Warren et al., Hartman v...

196 Wells, Greenough v. St. Paul, Minneapolis and Mani

Weed v. Sampsel toba Ry. Co., Erickson v

423 Wheeler, Truman

516

288

356

1

76, 251

414

524

186 258

329 381 442

63

Co. v.

28

82 311 467 309

542 64,513

172

et al. v..

461

60 TABLE OF CASES CITED.

[blocks in formation]

[The abbreviation "L. D.” refers to this publication; "L. and R.," to the records in the division of

Lands and Railroads; "B. L. P." refers to Brainerd's Legal Precedents; “1. C. L. L.,” to Copp's Public Land Laws, Ed. 1875; "2. C. L. L.," to Copp's Public Land Laws, Ed. 1882; “C. L. 0.," to Copp's Land Owner; "C. M. D.," to Copp's Mining Decisions; “C. M. L.," to Copp's Mineral Lands; “Lester," to Lester's Land Laws and Decisions; “Rep.," to the Reporter; "S. M. D.," to Sickles's Mining Laws and Decisions; and "C. Cls.," to the Court of Claims.]

Page.

112 581 564 167 438 539

156 538 510

88, 103

95 485 112

292.

Page. Adams v. Farrington; 15 L. D., 234..

383 Brooks v. Tobien; 4 L. D., 560 Aldrach, C. W. et al.; 13 L. D., 572

581 Brown, Joseph; 5 L. D., 316. Alexander v. Hamilton; 17 L. D., 452 .... 173 Browne v. Ryan; 3 L. D., 468.. Allen r. Northern Pacific R. R. Co.; 6 L.

Brownlee v. Shill; 14 L. D., 309 D., 520

226 Brush v. Ware; 15 Peters, 93.. Allen v. Withrow; 110 U. S., 119...

69 Buckley v. Daley; 45 Miss., 338. Anderson v. Northern Pacific Railroad

Burlington and Missouri River R. R. Co.; Company et al.; 7 L. D., 163.

559 6 L. D., 589 Anderson et al. o. Simpson et al. ; 21 Iowa,

Butler v. Lee; 54 Miss., 476. 399 ........

144 Butman v. Barrister; 13 L. D., 493...... Anderson v. Tannehill et al.; 10 L. D.,388. 106 Buttz v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co.; 119 U. Andrews 0. Cory; 7 L. D., 89

174

S., 55...
Atlantic and Pacific R. R.Co.; 6 L. D., 87. 90 Byer v. Burrill; 6 L. D., 521
Augur v. McGuire; 18 L. D., 408.

104 Byrne v. Dorward; 5 L. D., 104 Axford v. Shanks (on review); 13 L. D.,

Bywater v. Hill et al.; 5 L. D., 15 498

Caldwell v. Fulton; 31 Pa., 475. Bailey v. Townsend; 5 L. D., 176.

195 California, State of; 15 L. D., 10 Baker et al. o. Biggs; 15 L. D., 41

111 Callaghan, Michael; 1 L. D., 301 Baldwin, Joseph B.; 15 L. D., 374.

290 Campbell, John; 6 L. D., 317. Banks v. Smith; 2 L. D., 44

564 Campbell v. Middleton; 7 L. D., 400 Barclay et al. v. The State of California;

Campos, Pomoseno; 16 L. D., 430.. 6L. D., 699..

559

Carpenter v. Bowen; 42 Miss., 28. Bardon v. Northern Pacific Railroad Com.

Case v. Church; 17 L. D., 578. pany; 145 U. S., 535...

20, 80, 216, 460 Cayuga Lode; 5 L. D., 703.. Bardon v. Northern Pacific Railroad Com.

Cedar Rapids and Missouri River R. R. pany; 152 U.S., 288...

412 Co.; 110 U.S., 27 Barker, Johnson; 1 L, D., 164.

Central Pacific Railroad Company v. Barnes, Horace H.; 11 L. D., 621..

483

Geary; 7 L.D., 150 Barnes, Julius A.; 6 L. D., 522

514 Chapman v. Zweck; 1 L. D., 123 Beecher v. Wetherby; 95 U.S., 517

519 Chesley v. Rice; 16 L. D., 120 Bellv. Bolles; 9 L. D., 148....

173 Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Benschoter v. Williams; 3 L. D., 419..

562 Ry. Co.; 11 L. D., 607.. Berry, Augustus H.; 18 L. D., 192.

462 Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Berry v. Corette; 15 L. D., 210,

293 R.R. Co.; 6 L. D., 209.. Blackburn v. Bishop et al.; 17 L. D., 277.. 438 Clarke v. Wilson; 53 Miss., 119 Bodie Tunnel and Manufacturing Co. v.

Cleveland et al. v. North et al.; 16 L. D., 484. Bechtel Manufacturing Co. et al.; 1 L.

Cockrum. A. L.; 15 L. D., 335.. D., 584..

358 Coder v. Lotridge; 12 L. D., 643.. Bowman, William H.; 7 L. D., 8.

392 Cole v. Shotwell; 15 L. D., 404 Bowman v. Roberts; 58 Miss., 126

142 360 563 322 488 437 539

18 456

155

38

491 494 406

10

62 Ch

156 538 165

40 562

319

538 Connelly v. Boyd ; 7 L. D., 369; 10 L. D., 489. Boyd v. Thayer; 143 U.S., 135, 162, 169.. 272 Cooper v. Roberts; 18 How., 173 Bradbury v. Dickenson; 14 L. D.,

498 Coryell v. Cain; 16 Cal., 567,573. Bray o. Colby; 2 L. D., 78....

242 Cotton, C. N., 12 L. D., 205... Brennan v. Hume; 10 L. D., 160......

523 Coxv. Gilliland; C. L. L., 368 Bright et al. v. Elkhorn Mining Co.; 8 L.

Crews, Nancy J.; 14 L.D., 687. D., 122.. 358 Crews et al. v. Burcham et al.; 1 Black, 352.

206 586 368 321 557 392 75

« ForrigeFortsett »