 the rule for jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which specially appears to be so, and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court...  Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah - Side 372av Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, George L. Nye, Joseph M. Tanner, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, William S. Dalton, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, H. Arnold Rich - 1899Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | United States. Congress. House - 574 sider
...purpose, and is not comprised in the general powers arid jurisdiction of the court. It is a general rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a supreme court but that which specially appears to be so ; and, on the contrary, nothing s\\a\\ be intended... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, William Pyle Taunton - 1815 - 860 sider
...Dairies, 1 Ld. Raym. „/" 796., and Winford v. Powell, ibid. 1310., vis. that nothing shall MDNKLEY. be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior...court, but that which specially appears to be so; and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Richard Vaughan Barnewall, John Leycester Adolphus - 1832 - 1068 sider
...stated ; and, secondly, whether, if they are so, they support the pleas. It is an established rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...superior court but that which specially appears to be so, nor any thing within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is so expressly alleged,... | |
 | Thomas Coventry, Samuel Hughes - 1832 - 672 sider
...has exceeded its own jurisdiction, unless it is apparent that it has done so. Aтm. 10 Mod. 71. 4. Nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...superior court but that which specially appears to be so ; but, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court... | |
 | 1833 - 548 sider
...statute, as upon the authority of that well known and established legal maxim, in l Sand. (Wms.) 74 a, " that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...Court, but that which specially appears to be so." Mr. Justice Botanquet said, " The real question here is, hat there been an txceti of juritdiction ?... | |
 | 1834 - 612 sider
...accordance with the distinction; well settled in the books, and which is an important rule of pleading, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but what expressly appears to be so, nor within the jurisdiction of an inferior court, but what is expressly... | |
 | John Frederick Archbold - 1838 - 682 sider
...inquiry. Ruddock v. Smith, 1 Dowl. 467. *CHAFTER VI. PLEAS TO THE JURISDICTION. IT is a general rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...superior court, but that which specially appears to be so ; and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1843 - 962 sider
...in Wales, county palatine of Chester, and the court of Ely — Pigye v. Gardner, 1 Lev. 208 : for, " nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but what expressly appears to be so ; nor within the jurisdiction of an inferior court, but what is expressly... | |
 | 1852 - 632 sider
...William* v. Germaine, 7 B. & C. 468.) The rule of pleading the jurisdiction of Inferior Courts is, "that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior but that which specially appears to be so : and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within... | |
| |
