Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before this Court. The rule to show cause, issued on June 23, 1997 [ante, p. 1102], is discharged.

No. D-1820. IN RE DISBARMENT OF FRANZEN. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 1133.]

No. D-1824. IN RE DISBARMENT OF BARRON. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 1134.]

No. D-1826. IN RE DISBARMENT OF PICCIRILLI. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 1134.]

No. D-1828. IN RE DISBARMENT OF NEWELL. Disbarment entered. (For earlier order herein, see ante, 1134.)

No. D-1829. IN RE DISBARMENT OF DYSON. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 1135.]

No. D-1834. IN RE DISBARMENT OF APOLLO. Disbarment entered. (For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 1135.]

No. D-1835. IN RE DISBARMENT OF BECKMAN. Disbarment entered. (For earlier order herein, see ante, p. 1135.]

No. D-1839. IN RE DISBARMENT OF SARANELLO. Joseph Anthony Saranello, of Houston, Tex., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1840. IN RE DISBARMENT OF GILBERT. Ronald Bart Gilbert, of Miami, Fla., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1841. IN RE DISBARMENT OF SEGAL. Theodore Joseph Segal, of Phoenix, Ariz., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1842. IN RE DISBARMENT OF STEWARD. Harrison B. Steward III, of Orlando, Fla., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days,

[blocks in formation]

requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1843. IN RE DISBARMENT OF TUCCORI. Lawrence Stanley Tuccori, of Fresno, Cal., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1844. IN RE DISBARMENT OF DAVIS. James Herman Davis, of Los Angeles, Cal., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1845. IN RE DISBARMENT OF KADISH. Charles Kadish, of Buffalo Grove, Ill., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1846. IN RE DISBARMENT OF JACKSON. Andrew D. Jackson, of Whiting, Ind., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1847. IN RE DISBARMENT OF WOLHAR. Robert C. Wolhar, Jr., of Georgetown, Del., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1848. IN RE DISBARMENT OF GILLERAN. Robert Thomas Gilleran, of Los Angeles, Cal., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1849. IN RE DISBARMENT OF PICKETT. Neal Yarborough Pickett, of Houston, Tex., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

[blocks in formation]

No. D–1850. IN RE DISBARMENT OF MARCUS. Lyn H. Marcus, of Los Angeles, Cal., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1851. IN RE DISBARMENT OF SMITH. Nicholas Smith, of Plymouth, Mich., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1852. IN RE DISBARMENT OF GREENE. Lawrence R. Greene, of Detroit, Mich., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1853. IN RE DISBARMENT OF THORNTON. Kenneth W. Thornton, Jr., of Georgetown, S. C., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1854. IN RE DISBARMENT OF FISHER. Robert Patrick Fisher, of Scotts Valley, Cal., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. D-1855. IN RE DISBARMENT OF HOPEWELL. Richard James Hopewell, of Sioux Falls, S. D., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

No. 120, Orig. NEW JERSEY V. NEW YORK. Motions of the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States et al., New York Landmarks Conservancy et al., and New York Historical Society et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master are set for oral argument in due course. Motion of New York for leave to file a surreply brief denied. [For earlier order herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 1116.]

[blocks in formation]

No. 96–188. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. ET AL. V. JOINER ET UX. C. A. 11th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 520 U. S. 1114.] Motions of Ardith Cavallo and Association of Trial Lawyers of America for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted.

No. 96-370. BAY AREA LAUNDRY AND DRY CLEANING PENSION TRUST FUND v. FERBAR CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC., ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 520 U. S. 1209.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

No. 96-976. HUDSON ET AL. V. UNITED STATES. C. A. 10th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 520 U. S. 1165.] Motion of Ohio et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae denied.

No. 96–1291. OUBRE v. ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. C. A. 5th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 520 U. S. 1185.) Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

No. 96–1337. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO ET AL. v. LEWIS ET AL., PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF LEWIS, DECEASED. C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 520 U. S. 1250.] Motion of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.

No. 96-1395. KING, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT v. ERICKSON ET AL., and KING, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT v. MCMANUS ET AL. C. A. Fed. Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1117.] Motion of International Association of Chiefs of Police, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted.

No. 96-1469. UNITED STATES V. RAMIREZ. C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1103.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.

No. 96–1482. LEXECON INC. ET AL. v. MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 520 U. S. 1227.] Motion of respondent Joseph W. Cotchett et al. for divided argument denied.

Probable Jurisdiction Noted

No. 97–29. TEXAS v. UNITED STATES ET AL. Appeal from D. C. D. C. Probable jurisdiction noted. Brief of appellant is to

[blocks in formation]

be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, November 13, 1997. Brief of appellees is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, December 15, 1997. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, January 5, 1998. This Court's Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Certiorari Granted

No. 96–1584. CAMPBELL V. LOUISIANA. Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, November 13, 1997. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, December 15, 1997. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, January 5, 1998. This Court's Rule 29.2 does not apply. Reported below: 673 So. 2d 1061.

No. 96–1693. HOPKINS, WARDEN v. REEVES. C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1, 2, and 4 presented by the petition. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, November 13, 1997. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, December 15, 1997. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, January 5, 1998. This Court's Rule 29.2 does not apply. Reported below: 102 F. 3d 977.

No. 96–1768. FELTNER V. COLUMBIA PICTURES TELEVISION, INC. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are requested to brief and argue the following question: “Whether 17 U. S. C. § 504(c) permits or requires a jury trial in actions for statutory damages for copyright infringement.” Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, November 13, 1997. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, December 15, 1997. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed

« ForrigeFortsett »