Report of Leading Decisions, Volum 2The Board, 1919 |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Report of Leading Decisions, Volum 2 Kentucky. Workmen's Compensation Board Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1919 |
Report of Leading Decisions, Volum 3 Kentucky. Workmen's Compensation Board Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1920 |
Report of Leading Decisions, Volum 4 Kentucky. Workmen's Compensation Board Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1922 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
abscess accident and injury accident arose alleged accident aortic insufficiency arise average weekly earnings awarded compensation Board Brewer burden of proof cars Carson cause child cident Clontz common law condition course court death of decedent Decided January duty Elzie employer employment entitled erysipelas established evidence father Findings of Fact follows foreman Forgy hernia Hollenbach husband injured employe injury by accident January 16 John Templeton John Whitehead July Kentucky Utilities living Louisville Water Company McNicol Member MEMORANDA notice O'NEAL & O'NEAL O'NEAL for defendant partial dependency period of 335 permanent partial physician Pixley plaintiff plaintiff to show pleurisy ployment pre-existing disease presumption prior question R. C. P. Thomas Ruling of Law Sarah Hughes section 12 septicaemia street sustained syphilis testified testimony tion total dependent traumatic injury trip hammer tuberculosis typhoid fever voluntarily abandoned Walther Wasserman test Wayne Blankenship weeks wife Workmen's Compensation
Populære avsnitt
Side 137 - The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood. It must be incidental to the character of the business and not independent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence.
Side 70 - In all other cases questions of dependency, in whole or in part, shall be determined in accordance with the fact, as the fact may be at the time of the injury...
Side 44 - The following persons shall be conclusively presumed to be wholly dependent for support upon a deceased employe: (a) A wife upon a husband with whom she lives at the time of his death...
Side 64 - It is sufficient to say that an injury -is received 'in the course of' the employment when it comes while the workman is doing the duty which he is employed to perform. It arises ' out of ' the employment, when there is apparent to the rational mind upon consideration of all the circumstances, a causal connection between the conditions under which the work is required to be performed and the resulting injury.
Side 137 - out of " the employment, when there is apparent to the rational mind upon consideration of all the circumstances, a causal connection between the conditions under which the work is required to be performed and the resulting injury. Under this test, if the injury can be seen to have followed as a natural incident of the work and to have been contemplated by a reasonable person familiar with the whole situation as a result of the exposure occasioned by the nature of the employment, then it arises...
Side 26 - ... or if there is no person so employed, by a person in the same grade employed in the same class of employment and in the same district. If a workman at the time of the injury is regularly employed in a higher grade of work than formerly during the year and with larger regular wages, only such larger wages shall be taken into consideration in computing his average weekly wages.
Side 140 - If a servant in the course of his master's business has to pass along the public street, whether it be on foot or on a bicycle, or on an omnibus or car, and he sustains an accident by reason of the risks incidental to the streets, the accident arises out of as well as in the course of his employment.
Side 137 - ... out of the employment. But it excludes an injury which cannot fairly be traced to the employment as a contributing proximate cause and which comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood. It must be incidental to the character of the business and not independent of the relation of master and servant It need not have...
Side 50 - In all other cases questions of entire or partial dependency shall be determined in accordance with the fact, as the fact may be at the time of the injury...
Side 79 - Want of notice or delay in giving notice shall not be a bar to proceedings under this Act if it be shown that the employer, his agent or representative, had knowledge of the accident or that the employer has not been prejudiced by such delay or want of notice.