 | Connecticut. Supreme Court of Errors - 1886 - 666 sider
...reason given for holding the contract void as opposed to public policy is, that in making the contract the carrier and his customer do not stand on a footing of equality ; that the latter is only one individual against a powerful corporation, •which has him in its power,... | |
 | 1885 - 544 sider
...the case of .Railroad Co. v. Lockieood, 17 Wall. 379, Mr. Justice Bradley says: "The carrier and hla customer do not stand on a footing of equality. The latter is only one of a million. He cannot afford to higgle or stand out and seek redress In courts. His business will... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1885 - 1744 sider
...physical duress." In the case of Railroad Co. v. Lockwood, 17 Wall. 379, Mr. Justice Bradley says : " The carrier and his customer do not stand on a footing of equality. The latter is only one of a million. He cannot afford to higgle or stand out and seek redress in courts. His business will... | |
 | 1874 - 778 sider
...their power to change the law of common carriers in effect, by introducing new rules of obligation. The carrier and his customer do not stand on a footing...rather, to accept any bill of lading, or sign any VOL. I. 3 V«l. L] >'. YCRR r. LOCKWOOD. [No. 1. paper the carrier presents ; often, indeed, without... | |
 | 1874 - 844 sider
...to change the law of common carriers in effect, by introducing new rules of obligation. The earner and his customer do not stand on a footing of equality....million. He cannot afford to higgle or stand out and seek redrew in the courte. His business will not admit such a course. He prefers, rather, to accept any... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 738 sider
...their power to change the law of common carriers in efl'ect, by introducing new roles of obligation. The carrier and his customer do not stand on a footing...of a million. He cannot afford to higgle or stand put and seek redress in the courts. His business will not admit such a course. He prefers, rather,... | |
 | 1874 - 660 sider
...their power to change the law of common carriers in effect, by introducing new rules of obligation. The, carrier and his customer do not stand on a footing...The latter is only one individual of a million. He can not afford to higgle or stand out and seek redress in the courts. His business will not admit such... | |
 | 1874 - 752 sider
...their power to change the law of common carriers in effect, by introducing new rules of obligation. The carrier and his customer do not stand on a footing of equality. The latter ¡.ч only one individual of a million. He cannot afford to higgle or stand out and seek redress in... | |
 | 1876 - 816 sider
...their power to change the law of common carriers in efiect by introducing new rules of obligation. The carrier and his customer do not stand on a footing...million. He cannot afford to higgle or stand out and seek redri'ss in one court. His business does not admit such a course. He prefers rather to accept every... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1899 - 602 sider
...duties of his employment. And to assert that he may do so seems almost a contradiction in terms. * * * "The carrier and his customer do not stand on a footing...redress in the courts. His business will not admit of such a course. He prefers, rather, to accept any bill of lading, or sign any paper the carrier presents;... | |
| |
The carrier and his customer do not stand on a footing of equality. The latter is only one individual of a million. He cannot afford to higgle or stand out and seek redress in the courts. 
