 | 1874 - 486 sider
...ordinary. The conclusions to which we have come are — First, that a common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such...is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law. Secondly, that it is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common carrier to stipulate... | |
 | 1890 - 542 sider
...the United States holds that common carriers cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from liability when such exemption is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law; that it is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for them to stipulate for exemption from liability... | |
 | 1885 - 544 sider
...357, the following propositions were laid down by this court : (1) A common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such exemption is not just and reasonable iu the eye of the law. (2) It is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common carrier... | |
 | 1892 - 582 sider
...stipulate for exemption from IOss occasioned by his own negligence or that of his servants. Such an exemption is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law. Nor is it necessary for us to so hold in order to sustain the contract under consideration, for, as... | |
 | 1874 - 450 sider
...ordinary. The conclusions to which we have come are — First. That a common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such...is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law. Secondly. That it is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common carrier to stipulate... | |
 | 1874 - 660 sider
...ordinary. The conclusions to which we have come are : First. That a common carrier can not lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such...is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law. Secondly. That it is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common carrier to stipulate... | |
 | 1874 - 440 sider
...ordinary. The conclusions to which we have come are — First. That a common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such...is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law. Secondly. That it is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common carrier to stipulate... | |
 | 1874 - 752 sider
...ordinary. The conclusions to which we have come are — Pint. That a common carrier can not lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such...is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law. S-tmiUy. That it is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common currier to stipulate... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 738 sider
...as a supersedeas. MOTION DENIED. RAILROAD COMPANY v. LOCKWOOD. 1. A common carrier cannot lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility when such...exemption is not just and reasonable in the eye of the luw. 2. It is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common carrier to stipulate for exemption... | |
 | 1874 - 844 sider
...of A'ew York. 1. A common carrier «tu not lawfully stipulate for exemption from responsibility wheu such exemption is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law. 2. It is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common carrier to stipulate for exemption... | |
| |
That it is not just and reasonable in the eye of the law for a common carrier to stipulate for exemption from responsibility for the negligence of himself or his servants. 
