Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

CONTENTS.

PHILOSOPHY.

I. ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE UNCONDITIONED; IN REFERENCE
TO COUSIN'S INFINITO-ABSOLUTE, .

(Oct. 1829.-Edinburgh Review, Vol. 1., No. xcix., pp.

194-221.)

PAGE

1

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

III. JOHNSON'S TRANSLATION OF TENNEMANN'S MANUAL OF THE
HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY,

(Oct. 1832.-Vol. lvi., No. cxi., pp. 160-177.)

99

[ocr errors]

IV. LOGIC. THE RECENT ENGLISH TREATISES ON THAT SCIENCE, 117 (April 1833.--Vol. lvi., No. cxv., pp. 194-238.)

V. DEAF AND DUMB. HISTORY OF THEIR INSTRUCTION, IN REFER-
ENCE TO DALGARNO,

[ocr errors]

(July 1835.-Vol. lxi., No. cxxiv., pp. 407-417.)

VI. IDEALISM; WITH REFERENCE TO THE SCHEME OF ARTHUR COL

LIER,

(April 1839.-Vol. lxviii., No. cxxxviii., pp. 337-353.)

174

185

>

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

I. ON THE STUDY OF MATHEMATICS, AS AN EXERCISE OF MIND,
(Jan. 1836.-Vol. lxii., No. cxxvi., pp. 409-455. Note, Vol.
lxiii., No. cxxvii., pp. 270-275.)

II. ON THE CONDITIONS OF CLASSICAL LEARNING. RELATIVE
TO THE DEFENCE OF CLASSICAL EDUCATION, BY PROFESSOR
PILLANS,

(Oct. 1836.-Vol. Ixiv., No. cxxix., pp. 106-124.)

III. ON THE PATRONAGE AND SUPERINTENDENCE OF UNIVERSI-
TIES,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

(April 1834. Vol. lix., No. cxix., pp. 196-227.)

IV. ON THE STATE OF THE ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES, WITH MORE
ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO OXFORD,

(June 1831.-Vol. liii., No. cvi., pp. 384-427.)

V. ON THE STATE OF THE ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES, WITH MORE
ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO OXFORD. (SUPPLEMENTAL),

(Dec. 1831.-Vol. liv., No. cviii., pp. 478-504.)

[blocks in formation]

VI. ON THE RIGHT OF DISSENTERS TO ADMISSION INTO
ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES,

(Oct. 1834.-Vol. lx., No. cxxi., pp. 202-230.)

VII. ON THE RIGHT OF DISSENTERS TO ADMISSION INTO
ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES. (SUPPLEMENTAL),

(Jan. 1835.--Vol. lx., No. cxxii., pp. 422-445.)

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

VIII. COUSIN ON GERMAN SCHOOLS,

553

(July 1833.- Vol. lvii., No. cxvi., pp. 505-542.)

I. APPENDIX, PHILOSOPHICAL.

(A.) CONDITIONS OF THE THINKABLE SYSTEMATISED,-ALPHABET OF HUMAN THOUGHT; (CAUSALITY :),

[ocr errors]

(B.) PHILOSOPHICAL TESTIMONIES TO THE LIMITATION OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, FROM THE LIMITATION OF OUR FACULTIES.

595

i.) Testimonies to the general fact,—that our highest Know-
ledge is a consciousness of Ignorance,

629

ii) Testimonies to the more special fact,—that all our Know-
ledge, whether of Mind or of Matter, is only phæno-
menal,

639

iii.) Testimonies to the recognition of Occult Causes,

642

II. APPENDIX, LOGICAL.

A.) OF SYLLOGISM, ITS KINDS, CANONS, NOTATIONS, MNEMONICS,
PARTS, &c.,

B.) ON AFFIRMATION AND NEGATION,-ON PROPOSITIONAL FORMS,

646

-ON BREADTH AND DEPTH,-ON SYLLOGISTIC, AND SYLLO-
GISTIC NOTATION,

672

III. APPENDIX, EDUCATIONAL.

(A.) ACADEMICAL PATRONAGE AND REGULATION, IN REFERENCE TO THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH,

(B.) THE EXAMINATION AND HONOURS FOR A DEGREE IN ARTS, DURING CENTURIES ESTABLISHED IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LOUVAIN,.

(C.) ON A REFORM OF THE ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES: WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO OXFORD; AND LIMITED TO THE FACULTY OF ARTS, .

P

INDEX,

8:

PHILOSOPHY.

I.-PHILOSOPHY OF THE UNCONDITIONED.

IN REFERENCE TO COUSIN'S DOCTRINE

P. 385 1. 1 of footnote F

[Translated into French, by M. Peisse; into Italian, by S. Lo Carto. Crosse's Selections from the Edinburgh Review.

This article did not originate with myself. I was requested to write it by my friend, the late accomplished Editor of the Review, Professor Napier. Personally, I felt averse from the task. I was not unaware, that a discussion of the leading doctrine of the book would prove unintelligible, not only to "the general reader," but, with few exceptions, to our British metaphysicians at large. But, moreover, I was still farther disinclined to the undertaking, because it would behove me to come forward in overt opposition to a certain theory, which, however powerfully advocated, I felt altogether unable to admit; whilst its author, M. Cousin, was a philosopher for whose genius and character I already had the warmest admiration, -an admiration which every succeeding year has only augmented, justified, and confirmed. Nor, in saying this, need I make any reservation. For I admire, even where I dissent; and were M. Cousin's speculations on the Absolute utterly abolished, to him would still remain the honour, of doing more himself, and of

A

« ForrigeFortsett »