[ocr errors]


[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]


3 s

arc tan x. (*x+1) 8 1+xx 8 Consequently by adding all these fluents together, we obtain



1 (xx+2)+


(1+x1) ** (**+2) (*2 +133= 12 ?(1+2) + ?(3+2)+ 1/ 12(**+1) + arc tan 52+C, the fluent of the fraction proposed.


1 2

[ocr errors]

1 23

} (x+1)


arc tan I

1 672


[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

(x-x+1) 5.

? (x+1) (x+1)

(+*+2x+3x2+3). 6.

(x2+1)3 69. From what precedes, it appears that every fluxion under the form of a rational fraction is integrable, either algebraically, or by logarithms or circular arcs. The only difficulty consists in finding the factors of the denominator Q. But this arises rather from the insufficiency of algebra, than of the methods of integration which we

bave given.

Consequently when we can render any fluxional fraction rational, we shall be sure to obtain its fluent. We will now proceed to exhia bit a few cases in which this is possible.

70. And first let us suppose that in the quantity proposed there are no other radicals than such as consist of a single term; for example such as ()*+:$Vx+13) I write it thus


[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

*=2", r = 12 z"Ż, the Auxion will become rational, and consequently integrable.

Again let X be a rational function of x; in order to find the integral of y=Xv (a + bx + cxx), I find the two factors of a+bx+cxr;

if they are real, I have v(a+bx+crx)=v(m+nr) (p+qx). Supposing this quantity=(m+ne) z, and squaring it

, we shall have p+qr=(m+nx) zz, whence <=

P-m 22

and i =

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

1 + 2%

2za (mq-pn). Consequently (m+nx) z=(pn-mq) ? (nz3-9)?

nzz-9 n(a+bx+cra). These values being substituted in the formula X: v(a+bx+cra) will render it rational, and consequently integrable. The same thing would evidently take place, if we were

X. required to integrate the formula y =

v(a+bx+cr) EXAMPLE 1. Let y=iv(aa—*), make v(au-rx=(a–#) ;; then -a+az? 4azz


and (a~7)2= = v(aa); 1+zz


8a? x consequently y= a rational quantity of which the fluent is

(1+z2) 3' easily found.

i Ex. 2. Let y

; making v(xx-aa)=(-a) 2, we V(xx-aa)

-22 shall have y=


y=log2_1 71. When the factors of a +bx+cx* are imaginary, we must es. terminate the second term of this quantity by supposing :+2=


20 and then Xin(a+bx+cxx) becomes of the form Zaw (23+06) Let then v(x+6)=2+, and we shall have.

2u ᏌᏌ +uu

u » (x2+669=8+4=

and is

(C'E' + uu); these va

Zuu lues substituted in the formula Zi 7(x+66', or


✓(x2+66) render it rational.

6'6' _UU

[ocr errors]

%, and



[ocr errors]



[ocr errors]

For example, let y = *(*++da); making V(x* +aa)=x+2,

2 we shall have y=+*+zë; but :=-(aa+zz) therefore y=.ring

x_a2. lzC-aa aV aal (x + 2x + aa) da la. Now let C-aa-aa la -- C', and we shall have y=C+ V (xx+aa) +} aal(++ Väx+aa)

72. This same method might have been applied to the first case in which a +bx+cx? has two real factors; for, on exterminating the second term, we shall have to integrate z ✓(22—66), or zv(b6--22). And if we suppose „(zz-bb) =%-, or ✓(66zz)=b-uz, we shall make both fluxions rational.

Examples for Practice. 1. Required the fluent of (1+V_V3"]=>

1 + x

3x + x x + x2 2.

: ?




[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

73. When a fluxion is not susceptible of an exact integration, we must have recourse to approximations, and series are then one of the last resources. In effect, it is easy to perceive that by reducing to a series any function X of the variable it, we shall have a succes sion of simple terms, the aggregated fluents of which will give a near value of SXč.

For example, we already know that the fluent of


is the log

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]


[ocr errors]



[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

-&c. ;


(a +x). Now if we reduce into a series, either oy actual di.

ati vision or by the method of indeterminate coefficients, art. 41, page 95,

mo? c we shall find

+ -&c. Therefore or log Q+x

at de zo 203 (a+x)=

&c. +C. If we make x=0, the constant

2u? 3x3 C=log a ; consequently we shall have l (a+x)= la+* 23 and writing

- for x, we obtain l (ams) = la

+&c.). Suppose now that it

a+2 substitution we shall find I (am) = 2la-1 (a+2) =la

atz m2 -&c.; and therefore I (a+z) =la+aiz+zca+z)

+ 2 (a+z)? &c., a series converging with a degree of rapidity proportionate to the excess of a above 2.

For example l 100=l (99+1)=199+ +&

:1 +&c. -2.397, &c.* 2.112


or x =



[ocr errors]



[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

If we had y = then

y=arc tan x; but. being re1+XX

1+IX duced into a series, gives y=:~ri+z*=~~°*+&c. · therefore y 1

x? + &c.

7 Let now


any arc, x its sine, or y=arc sin t, we shall have j=

1-xx); this expression expanded into a se(1-4X)

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

The logarithms found above are the hyperbolicor Naperean ; these are directly converted into the common logarithms, by multiylying them by the constant factor 0.434294482.

[ocr errors]



[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]



+&c. If ==

the arc y

[ocr errors]



fær X': Let again


ries by the binomial theorem gives y=(1+

1.3 1.3.5 ** +

2.4 2.4.6

1 23 1.3 x" 1.3.5 æ? +&c.). Therefore y or arc sin x=x+ +


2 3 2.4 5 2.4.67 +&c., a fluent to which it is not necessary to add a correction. Letx=1, and call the semicircumference ®, and we shall obtain =l+

1.3 1 1.3.5 1

becomes 3

esta 2.4 5 2.4.6 7 1 1.3 1 1.3.5 1 + +

+&c. 2 3.23' 2.4 5.25 2.4.6 7.27 74. These examples suffice to explain the preceding method. That which follows will merit attention.

The formula flux (xy)=ay+, gives xy=fxy +Syč ; therefore, in general fxy=xy-Syč, and if we denote by X any function of x, we shall in like manner have /Xi=Xx-fxX. Call Å=X':'; then by

Xxx the same principle S«, or SX' x:= ***


23 X> "&c

2.3 Substituting these different values in the first expression, we shall obtain

SXi=8-- X'+
-X ".

2.3 2.3.4
or, supposing constant

m2 X 23 X ** SX;=X.r_<*X+


2.x 2.3.2 Example. Let X= and we shall have

Ë 2


&c. (a+*) (a+*)s


el Therefore

at that is

+&c as we have



[ocr errors]

before found it

« ForrigeFortsett »