Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

No. 92-5815. RAGSDALE v. RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER ET AL. C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 953 F. 2d 639.

No. 92-5816. MILLER v. MARSHALL, WARDEN. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 92-5817. MASON v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied.

No. 92-5826. STANSBURY v. REDMAN, WARDEN, ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 92-5827. OLIVEROS v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 965 F.2d 1064.

No. 92-5830. HUFFSMITH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 92-5832. BEASLEY v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 968 F. 2d 21.

No. 92-5833. CARLISLE v. GRADICK ET AL. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 958 F. 2d 1084.

No. 92-5836. SANDERS v. BORG, WARDEN, ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 963 F. 2d 380.

No. 92-5840. ENNIS v. POWERS, WARDEN. C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 963 F. 2d 376.

No. 92-5851. WOMBLE v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 959 F. 2d 243.

No. 92-5856. HAWKINS v. MURRAY, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied. No. 92-5864. LUCE v. MORRIS, WARDEN. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 966 F. 2d 1452.

No. 92-5874. GALLOWAY v. BORG, WARDEN. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 92-5880. BOUT v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.

[blocks in formation]

No. 92-5881. CREEL v. CITY OF ABILENE, TEXAS, ET AL. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 973 F. 2d 924. BARSELLA v. WATERS ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir. Cer

No. 92-5882. tiorari denied.

No. 92-5883. CONERLY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 947 F.2d 949.

No. 92-5905. PHILLIPS v. PHILLIPS. Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 327 Md. 524, 610 A. 2d 796.

No. 92-5915. TIMBANCAYA v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 976 F.2d 748.

No. 92-5916. BROWN v. UNITED STATES; and

No. 92-5917. BROWN v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 968 F. 2d 1212.

No. 92-5918. TELLEZ v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 966 F. 2d 1461.

No. 92-5919. tiorari denied.

No. 92-5926.

STREIT v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-
Reported below: 962 F. 2d 894.

GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 961 F. 2d 1581.

No. 92-5929.

HAYE v. THORN CREEK CATTLE ASSN., INC. Sup. Ct. Idaho. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 122 Idaho 42, 830 P. 2d 1180.

No. 92-5930. JONES v. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 961 F. 2d 214.

No. 92-5931. C. A. 4th Cir. 1442.

HOPKINS v. ARMSTRONG & ARMSTRONG ET AL.
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 966 F. 2d

No. 92-5932. FIELDS v. FLORIDA. Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 92-5942. MCDONALD ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 966 F. 2d 1447.

[blocks in formation]

No. 92-5944. ROACH v. RONE, WARDEN, ET AL. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 966 F. 2d 1454.

No. 92-5945. MALIK v. KUHLMANN, SUPERINTENDENT, SULLIVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 970 F. 2d 897.

No. 92-5961. GILL v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 968 F. 2d 14.

No. 92-5967. SEABROOKS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 296 U. S. App. D. C. 356, 968 F.2d 92.

No. 92-5972. SPEARMAN v. GARNER. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 974 F. 2d 170.

No. 92-5976. NANCE v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 966 F. 2d 1455.

No. 92-5979.

rari denied.

No. 92-5981.

MCEACHERN v. JONES. Sup. Ct. S. C. Certio

GARCIA v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir.

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 963 F. 2d 380.

No. 92-5982.

WYLEY v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 968 F. 2d 1217.

No. 92-5983. WOOD v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 970 F. 2d 901.

No. 92-5984. HERNANDEZ-CRUZ v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 959 F. 2d 242.

No. 92-5986. LANDT v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 966 F. 2d 1460.

No. 92-5994.

Certiorari denied.

CRAWFORD v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir.
Reported below: 972 F. 2d 346.

No. 92-5995. WEAVER v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 966 F. 2d 1462.

No. 92-5998. GREEN v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 967 F. 2d 459.

[blocks in formation]

No. 92-6000. SINGLETON v. NORRIS, ACTING DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION. C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 962 F. 2d 1315.

No. 92-6008. JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 968 F. 2d 208.

No. 92-6016.

C. A.

11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 963 F. 2d 1467.

MARIN-HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES.

C. A. 11th Cir.

No. 92-6021. LEE v. UNITED STATES. rari denied. Reported below: 958 F. 2d 1082.

Certio

No. 92-6026. AKINYOSOYE v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 966 F. 2d 1462.

No. 92-6028. ROBERTS v. CALIFORNIA. Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 2 Cal. 4th 271, 826 P. 2d 274.

No. 92-6034. ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 968 F. 2d 1224.

No. 92-6040.

MCNEAL v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 968 F. 2d 21.

No. 92-6046. tiorari denied.

No. 92-6048. tiorari denied.

No. 92-6049. tiorari denied.

No. 92-6051. tiorari denied.

No. 92-6053.

FLOOD v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-
Reported below: 965 F. 2d 505.

JONES v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-
Reported below: 972 F. 2d 1333.

GEORGE v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-
Reported below: 967 F. 2d 593.

HAGER v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-
Reported below: 969 F. 2d 883.

HILL v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certio

rari denied. Reported below: 967 F. 2d 226.

No. 92-6056. PRICE v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 956 F. 2d 271.

No. 92-6066.

DAVILA v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 8th Cir. Cer

tiorari denied. Reported below: 964 F. 2d 778.

No. 92-6075. GREEN v. MARYLAND. Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 90 Md. App. 767.

[blocks in formation]

No. 92-6083. CRIPPEN v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 961 F. 2d 882.

No. 92-6084. TRAVIS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 965 F. 2d 1507.

No. 92-6097. FRANCIS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 970 F. 2d 692.

No. 91-2075. ST. GELAIS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE would grant certiorari. Reported below: 952 F. 2d 90.

No. 92-205. GROSS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE Would grant certiorari. Reported below: 961 F. 2d 1097.

No. 92-209. STEEN v. THOMPSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR THOMPSON, A MINOR, ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE Would grant certiorari. Reported below: 959 F. 2d 241.

No. 92-433. SEARS, ROEBUCK & Co. v. BARATTINI. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE Would grant certiorari. Reported below: 966 F. 2d 677.

No. 92-452. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PowELL ET UX. C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE would grant certiorari. Reported below: 958 F. 2d 53.

No. 92-202. RANDOLPH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT v. ALDRICH. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 963 F.2d 520.

JUSTICE WHITE, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and JUSTICE O'CONNOR join, dissenting.

This case presents the question whether, under the federal Equal Pay Act, an employer seeking to establish the factor-otherthan-sex defense must prove that the factor is supported by a legitimate business-related reason.

In this case, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that an employer cannot meet the burden of proving this defense by asserting use of a gender-neutral classification system without more. 963 F. 2d 520, 525 (1992). Rather, the court below held, an employer bears the burden of proving that a bona fide

« ForrigeFortsett »