Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

No. 91-261. BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT v. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS OF MASSACHUSETTS/RHODE ISLAND, INC., ET AL.; and

No. 91-274. MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY ET AL. v. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS OF MASSACHUSETTS/RHODE ISLAND, INC., ET AL. C. A. 1st Cir. [Certiorari granted, 504 U. S. 908.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

No. 91-1353. CONROY v. ANISKOFF ET AL. Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. [Certiorari granted, 505 U. S. 1203.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

No. 91-1496. REITER ET AL. v. COOPER, TRUSTEE FOR CAROLINA MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 504 U. S. 907.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

No. 91-1600. HAZEN PAPER CO. ET AL. v. BIGGINS. C. A. 1st Cir. [Certiorari granted, 505 U. S. 1203.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

No. 91-1958. HELLING ET AL. v. MCKINNEY. C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 505 U. S. 1218.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

No. 91-5397. NEGONSOTT v. SAMUELS, WARDEN, ET AL. C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 505 U. S. 1218.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

No. 91-7358. BRECHT v. ABRAHAMSON, SUPERINTENDENT, DODGE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION. C. A. 7th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 504 U. S. 972.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

No. 91-522. SAUDI ARABIA ET AL. v. NELSON ET UX. C. A. 11th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 504 U. S. 972.] Motion of the So

[blocks in formation]

licitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motions of Human Rights Watch and International Human Rights Law Group et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted.

No. 91-538. FORSYTH COUNTY, GEORGIA v. NATIONALIST MOVEMENT, 505 U. S. 123. Motion of petitioner to permit late filing or response to motion for attorney's fees granted. Motion of respondent for attorney's fees denied.

No. 91-610. LOCAL 144 NURSING HOME PENSION FUND ET AL. v. DEMISAY ET AL. C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 505 U. S. 1203.] Motion of petitioners to substitute Frank Russo et al., Trustees of the Local 144 Nursing Home Pension Fund and New York City Nursing Home-Local 144 Welfare Fund, in place of Peter Ottley, deceased, and John Kelley et al. granted. Motions of Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans, and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Pension Funds et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted.

No. 91-687. MONTANA v. IMLAY. Sup. Ct. Mont. [Certiorari granted, 503 U. S. 905.] Motion of respondent for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted. Motion for appointment of counsel nunc pro tunc granted, and it is ordered that Billy B. Miller, Esq., of Great Falls, Mont., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case. Motion of petitioner to strike supplemental brief of respondent denied.

No. 91-790. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. EASTERWOOD; and No. 91-1206. EASTERWOOD v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. C. A. 11th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 505 U. S. 1217.] Motion of respondent/cross-petitioner to permit Tambra Pannell Colston, Esq., to present oral argument pro hac vice granted. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. JUSTICE BLACKMUN would deny this motion.

No. 91-794. HARPER ET AL. v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION. Sup. Ct. Va. [Certiorari granted, 504 U. S. 907.] Motion of Tax Executives Institute, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae denied.

[blocks in formation]

No. 91-904. CONCRETE PIPE & PRODUCTS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. CONSTRUCTION. LABORERS PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 504 U. S. 940.] Motion of Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motions of National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted.

No. 91-1160. ARAVE, WARDEN v. CREECH. C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 504 U. S. 984.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Cliff Gardner, Esq., of San Francisco, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.

No. 91-1188. ROWLAND, FORMER DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY, UNIT II MEN'S ADVISORY COUNCIL. C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 503 U. S. 905.] Motion of respondent to direct the Clerk to print respondent's supplemental brief granted.

No. 91-1300. UNITED STATES v. DUNNIGAN. C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 504 U. S. 940.] Motion of respondent for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Brent E. Beveridge, Esq., of Fairmont, W. Va., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.

No. 91-1306. UNITED STATES v. OLANO ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 504 U. S. 908.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Carter G. Phillips, Esq., of Washington, D. C., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Guy W. Olano, Jr., in this case. Motion of the Solicitor General to permit William K. Kelley, Esq., to present oral argument pro hac vice granted.

No. 91-1526. ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 8th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 505 U. S. 1217.] Motion of petitioner for leave to enlarge questions presented for review denied.

No. 91-1618. VOINOVICH, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL. v. QUILTER, SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE OF OHIO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, ET AL. D. C. N. D. Ohio. [Probable jurisdiction

[blocks in formation]

noted, 504 U. S. 954.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of the Solicitor General to permit Thomas G. Hungar, Esq., to present oral argument pro hac vice granted.

No. 91-1950. AMERICAN DREDGING Co. v. MILLER. Sup. Ct. La.;

No. 91-1970. KALITTA FLYING SERVICE, INC., ET AL. v. G. S. RASMUSSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. C. A. 9th Cir.;

No. 91-1992. FIGURES ET AL. v. HUNT, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, ET AL. Appeal from D. C. S. D. Ala.; and

No. 92-97. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., ET AL. v. COUNTY OF KENT, MICHIGAN, ET AL. C. A. 6th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.

No. 91-7328. HERRERA v. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 502 U. S. 1085.] Motion for appointment of counsel nunc pro tunc granted, and it is ordered that Mark Olive, Esq., of Tallahassee, Fla., be appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.

No. 91-7742. HUFFSMITH v. WYOMING COUNTY PRISON BOARD ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [504 U. S. 907] denied.

No. 91-7758. IN RE LANDES. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [504 U. S. 971] denied.

No. 91-8013. CLAMPITT v. INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE ET AL. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [504 U. S. 971] denied.

No. 91-8173. MARTIN v. DELAWARE. Sup. Ct. Del. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [505 U. S. 1203] denied.

No. 91-7804. BUFFERD v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 505 U. S. 1203.] Motion

[blocks in formation]

for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Stuart Jay Filler, Esq., of Bridgeport, Conn., be appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.

No. 91-8258. MARTIN v. DELAWARE. Sup. Ct. Del.;
No. 91-8729.

C. A. 1st Cir.;

No. 92-5068.

DEMPSEY v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. ET AL.

MARTIN v. SPARKS ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir.; No. 92-5105. JONES v. WRIGHT, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI, ET AL. C. A. 8th Cir.;

No. 92-5407. MARTIN v. SMITH ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir.; and

No. 92-5417. BRIGMAN v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 5th Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. See this Court's Rule 39.8. Petitioners are allowed until October 26, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. JUSTICE BLACKMUN and JUSTICE STEVENS Would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari.

No. 91-8428. IN RE JONES. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. See this Court's Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until October 26, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. JUSTICE BLACKMUN and JUSTICE STEVENS would deny the petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition.

No. 91-8492. SAMPANG v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 26, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

JUSTICE STEVENS, dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

No. 91-8579. MEDINA v. KANSAS. Ct. App. Kan.;

No. 91-8581. MCDONALD v. YELLOW CAB METRO, INC. Sup. Ct. Tenn.;

No. 91-8773. QUINN v. FELTHAM ET AL. C. A. 2d Cir.;

« ForrigeFortsett »