PENNSYLVANIA ET AL. v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CITY TRUSTS OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT. No. 947. Decided June 30, 1958. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 391 Pa. 434, 138 A. 2d 844. Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General, and Lois G. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Abraham L. Freedman and David Berger for the City of Philadelphia et al., and William T. Coleman, Jr., Raymond Pace Alexander and Louis H. Pollak for Foust et al., appellants. Arthur Littleton for the Substituted Trustees, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. 357 U.S. Per Curiam. NATIONAL BISCUIT CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIDDLE DISTRICT. No. 990. Decided June 30, 1958. Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Roy J. Keefer and Leslie M. Swope for appellant. Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George W. Keitel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Per Curiam. PRIMBS v. CALIFORNIA. 357 U.S. APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY. No. 730, Misc. Decided June 30, 1958. Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Appellant pro se. Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. 357 U.S. Per Curiam. JOINES v. UNITED STATES. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 387. Decided June 30, 1958. Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded for consideration in light of Jones v. United States, ante, p. 493. Reported below: 246 F. 2d 278. Judson E. Ruch and R. Palmer Ingram for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Warren Olney, III, then Assistant Attorney General, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of No. 331, Jones v. United States, ante, p. 493, decided this day. MR. JUSTICE BURTON and MR. JUSTICE CLARK dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in No. 331, decided this day. Per Curiam. 357 U.S. INDIVIGLIO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Certiorari granted. No. 753. Decided June 30, 1958. Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, judgment reversed on authority of cases cited. Reported below: 249 F. 2d 549. Bernard A. Golding for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is reversed. Jencks v. United States, 353 U. S. 657. See also Agnello v. United States, 269 U. S. 20, and Giordenello v. United States, ante, p. 480, decided this day. |