Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice

Forside
Cambridge University Press, 30. okt. 2006
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the ensuing 'war on terror' have focused attention on issues that have previously lurked in a dark corner at the edge of the legal universe. This book presents a systematic and comprehensive attempt by legal scholars to conceptualize the theory of emergency powers, combining post-September 11 developments with more general theoretical, historical and comparative perspectives. The authors examine the interface between law and violent crises through history and across jurisdictions, bringing together insights gleaned from the Roman republic and Jewish law through to the initial responses to the July 2005 attacks in London. Three models of emergency powers are used to offer a conceptualization of emergency regimes, giving a coherent insight into law's interface with and regulation of crisis and a distinctive means to evaluate the legal options open to states for dealing with crises.
 

Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale

Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.

Utvalgte sider

Innhold

rule and exception
172
suspected of involvement in terrorist activities in Northern Ireland was
184
invoking them instead of terrorists as the excuse and proposed
187
The collaboration of the two organizations and at the same
190
Algeria is nothing short of the disintegration of the state
193
placed under nightly curfews for unaccompanied children under 16
202
under the Antiterrorism Crime and Security Act of 2001 provided
205
striking the purpose and inserting a significant purpose What this
213

peace and order of significant magnitude then the Presidents decision
53
organ that is to exercise emergency powers under a declared
58
Nothing in this Constitution shall be invoked to invalidate any
62
When government is unified in the sense that the President
66
into that ordinary system Legislative provisions that are born out
67
Interpretive accommodation
72
the constitutions Contract Clause as well as its Due Process
77
relaxed or perhaps even suspended in part in order to
80
of powers Consequently all these systems are liable to be
82
government that was a relic of the past and a
84
2 Law for all seasons
86
The Founding Fathers and the American people recognized the
92
Holding the line
94
inevitable49 The argument from the strategy of resistance is that
99
question as to whether such a model is correct or
103
progress77 may be less inevitable but more dangerous78 By the
105
3 Models of extralegality
110
law that say we must accept destruction of our way
111
popular ex post ratification of such activities The process leading
113
extraordinary power20 First the court could impose a punishment that
117
All these matters apply to the extent that the judge
118
is replete with examples of sophisticated exegesis and hermeneutics of
119
crisis would have been the concession of sweeping constitutional
124
The Executive in seizing the fugitive occurrence which so much
125
ignoring a writ of habeas corpus issued by Judge Dominick
126
Supreme Court73 made the question of the legality of those
130
post justified acts of disobedience to the law on the
137
the necessity of the situation Indeed as we discuss below
142
the model is exposed to weighty critiques and the case
147
squarely on the shoulders of the public officials who must
153
guardians of rights and liberties once the crisis is over
154
InterAmerican Court of Human Rights and the United Nations Human
155
8 None of the presidential actions can be directed against
158
will conform to conventional tests of constitutionality he rejects the
160
the security of the state The possibility of extralegal action
161
Carl Schmitts dark shadow
162
4 Five degrees of separation
171
The distinct sphere of national security
214
on a wide range of topics188 As one author noted
216
us vs them
220
pose to us the greater in scope the powers assumed
221
The normalization of the exception
228
criminal process255 Regardless of the substantive merits of such a
231
prepared the Romans for Tiberius If the whole tone of
237
Security Act of 2002296 The new department which is composed
243
5 International human rights and
247
Definitions of emergency
249
The International Law Association ILA adopted another definition of
251
and emphasis they accentuate the capacity for definitional agreement
252
law to accommodate the extraordinary In such states the terms
255
powers by the state117 It shows that while accommodation models
282
political dilemmas about the rights of persons suspected of the
295
willingness of the commission to acknowledge and apply not only
297
information received through the 1503 and 1235 procedures202 Despite
304
Table 1
317
and international of such a declaration The report concludes by
321
order of domination also depends on its at least de
324
6 Emergencies and humanitarian law
326
concerning oversight of emergency situations as offered by international
328
was reinstituted Evidently as we have noted above this historical
339
imply that some internal conflicts are not appropriately regulated by
341
into account the consistent intensity of violence which would account
345
ignoring the implications of systematic abuses and rights violations76
348
The article contains the lowest threshold of both application and
356
the influence of human rights norms In this context the
362
7
365
of terrorism cannot in and of itself serve as a
371
acts of states it has not inquired into the legal
374
States will act againstemerging threats before they are fully formed
383
The terrorism and law interface
384
strict definitional boundaries is to preserve the principle of legality
394
plethora of domestic measures that may serve ultimately to undermine
400
the realm of ordinary legal regulation143 In this lie some
414
Conclusion
420

Andre utgaver - Vis alle

Vanlige uttrykk og setninger

Referanser til denne boken

Critique of Security
Mark Neocleous
Ingen forhåndsvisning tilgjengelig - 2008

Om forfatteren (2006)

Irving Younger Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Legal Studies at the University of Minnesota Law School.

Professor of Law and Director of the Transitional Justice Institute at the University of Ulster.

Bibliografisk informasjon