Liability in Collisions Between Vessels: Hearings Before the Merchant Marine and Fisheries Subcommittee of the Committee on Commerce, United States Senate, Eighty-seventh Congress, Second Session, on S. 2313, to Unify Apportionment of Liability in Cases of Collision Between Vessels, and Related Casualties; and S. 2314, to Limit the Liability of Shipowners, and for Other PurposesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1962 - 266 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 48
Side 9
... objection to the sub- mission of this statement from the standpoint of the administration's program . Senator BARTLETT . I guess you might as well go ahead with our other statement , and then there may be a question or two . Mr. SINGMAN ...
... objection to the sub- mission of this statement from the standpoint of the administration's program . Senator BARTLETT . I guess you might as well go ahead with our other statement , and then there may be a question or two . Mr. SINGMAN ...
Side 11
... objection to the submission of the statement from the standpoint of the administra- tion's program . As I pointed out , Mr. Chairman , I have also this supplemental statement . I apologize for the length of these 3 statements , but as ...
... objection to the submission of the statement from the standpoint of the administra- tion's program . As I pointed out , Mr. Chairman , I have also this supplemental statement . I apologize for the length of these 3 statements , but as ...
Side 37
... damages , is the rule of laches . Article 7 of the convention places periods of limitation . ( See appendix 1A for the convention . ) Comment . There appears to be no objection whatever to LIABILITY IN COLLISIONS BETWEEN VESSELS 37.
... damages , is the rule of laches . Article 7 of the convention places periods of limitation . ( See appendix 1A for the convention . ) Comment . There appears to be no objection whatever to LIABILITY IN COLLISIONS BETWEEN VESSELS 37.
Side 38
... objection whatever to this change . ( 2 ) Article 6 of the convention abolishes presumptions of fault in regard to liability for collision . Comment . Some slight objection has been raised on this point . The rule was placed in the ...
... objection whatever to this change . ( 2 ) Article 6 of the convention abolishes presumptions of fault in regard to liability for collision . Comment . Some slight objection has been raised on this point . The rule was placed in the ...
Side 39
... objection on their behalf , the real ground of which seems to be that under the rule of equal damages , the cargo owner can recover 100 percent of his loss from the non- carrying ship , whereas , under the convention rule , such ...
... objection on their behalf , the real ground of which seems to be that under the rule of equal damages , the cargo owner can recover 100 percent of his loss from the non- carrying ship , whereas , under the convention rule , such ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
1957 convention actual fault admiralty admiralty courts admiralty law adopted American claimants American law American Merchant Marine American shipowners amount Andrea Doria apply benefit cargo owners carrying vessel casualty Chairman charterer Collision Convention committee Congress constituted crew damages death claimants degree of fault delegation draft enacted entitled to limit fault or privity favor FREEDMAN Haight Harter Act injury and death Jones Act jurisdiction Justice lex fori limit liability limitation fund limitation of liability limitation proceeding limitation statutes litigation loss Maritime Administration Maritime Law Association maritime nations matter MATTESON Merchant Marine Institute negligence noncarrying vessel operators personal injury presumptions of fault principle provisions question ratification recovery representatives res ipsa loquitur respect result right to limit Sea Act seagoing Senator BARTLETT ship shipowner's shipowners SINGMAN statement statutory subrogation Supreme Court tion tonnage U.S. Senate underwriters United vention vessel owner