Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

Is that a true Copy of that Entry?

Rev. T. Wright.

It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he would next prove the Baptism of Mary the Daughter of Edmund Verney, No. 16. in the Pedigree.

Then the Witness was further asked:

Have you the original Register for 1674 ?

I have.

Do you find there an Entry of the Baptism of Mary, the Daughter of Edmund Verney?

[blocks in formation]

No. 8,

No. 9.

[ocr errors]

The same was read as follows:

"Baptisms.

Mary, Daughter of Edmund Verney and Mary his Wife, was bapt. Jan. 23, 1674."

Is that before you an examined Copy of that Entry?

It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he would next prove the Burial of the same Person.

Then the Witness was further asked :

Have you the Register of Burials of the Year 1695 ?
I have.

Will you read the Entry of the Burial of Mary Keling?

The same was read as follows:

"Burials.

"Feb. 14, 1695-6. Mary, Wife of John Keling, Esq., was buried in Woollen."

Is that in your Hand an examined Copy of that Entry?
It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he proposed next to prove the Burial of Mary Keling, No. 17. in the Pedigree.

Then the Witness was further asked :

Have you the original Register of Burials for 1696?

I have.

Do you find there an Entry of the Burial of Mary, Daughter of John Keling?

I do.

Will you read it?

66

The same was read as follows:

"Burials.

May 14, 1696. Mary, Daughter of John Kelying, Esq, and Mary his late Wife, was buried in Woollen."

Is

Is that in your Hand an accurate Copy of that Entry?

Yes.

The same was delivered in.

Rev. T. Wright.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he proposed next to prove the Burial of the First Lord Verney, No. 18. in the Pedigree.

[blocks in formation]

" June 28, 1717. John Verney, Baron of Belturbet, La Visct Fermanagh."

Is that in your Hand an accurate Copy of that Entry?
It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he would next prove the Burial of the First Earl Verney, No. 19. in the Pedigree.

Then the Witness was further asked :

Do you produce the original Register of the Parish of Middle Claydon for 1752?

I do.

Do you find there an Entry of the Burial of Earl Verney?
Yes.

Will you read it?

The same was read as follows:

"Burials.

"1752, Octob* 20.-The Right Hoñble Ralph Earl Verney."

Is that in your Hand a true Copy of that Entry?

It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he proposed next to prove the Baptism of John Verney, No. 20. in the Pedigree.

Then the Witness was further asked:

Have you the Register of Baptisms for 1711?

Yes.

Do you find there an Entry of the Baptism of John Verney?

I do.

No. 10.

No. 11.

[blocks in formation]

No. 13.

No. 14.

The same was read as follows:

[blocks in formation]

"1711.-John, Son of Raphe Verney and

in Essex (born at London)."

Is there no Month?

There is not.

Paschal, of Baddo

Is that an exact Copy taken from the original Entry ?
It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he next proposed to prove the Burial of this Person.

Then the Witness was further asked :

Do you produce the original Register of the Parish of Middle Claydon for 1737?

I do.

Do you find there an Entry of the Burial of the Right Honourable John Verney, Esquire ?

I do.

Will you read the same?

The same was read as follows:

"Burials.

"1737, June 20.-The Rt Honb John Verney, Esq. Mem. no Affidavit brought within 8 Days of ye said Corpse being buried in Woollen."

(By a Lord.) Is that a Register headed a Register of Burials? Yes, it is.

That about the Woollens is a Part of the Register?

Yes, I have read it precisely as it appears upon the Register.
(Mr. Lewis.) Is that in your Hand a correct Copy of that Entry?
Yes, it is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he would next prove the Burial of Mary the Daughter of the Honourable Mr. John Verney, No. 21. in the Pedigree.

Then the Witness was further asked :

Have you the original Register of Burials of the Parish of Middle Claydon for 1810?

I have.

Do you find there an Entry of the Burial of Mary Verney, Baroness Fermanagh?

I do.

Will you read the same?

The same was read as follows:
"Burials.

"Nov 28th, 1810.-The Rt Hoñble Mary Verney, Baroness Fermanagh. Her Ladyship deceased at her Seat of May Place in Kent, on the

15th

15th Inst, and was interred in the Family Vault under the Chancel Rev. T. Wright. of this Church. She was born on the 21st OctTM (O. S.) 1737, and was

the posthumous and only Child of the Honble John Verney, who was buried here on the 20th of June preceding. Extincta amabitur."

Is that before you a correct Copy of that Entry?

It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he proposed next to prove the Burial of the Second Earl Verney, No. 22. in the Pedigree.

Then the Witness was further asked :

Will you turn to the original Register of Burials for the Year 1791, and see whether there is an Entry of the Burial of the Second Earl Verney?

There is.

66

The same was read as follows:

"Burials.

April 8th, 1791. The Right Hoñble Ralph Earl of Verney."

Is that in your Hand a true Copy ?

It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he proposed next to prove the Burial of Lady Catharine Verney, No. 25. in the Pedigree.

Then the Witness was further asked:

Do you produce the original Register of Middle Claydon for 1750?

I do.

Do

I do.

you

find there an Entry of the Burial of Lady Catharine Verney?

Will you read the same?

The same was read as follows:

"Burials.

"1750, Aug 26. Lady Catharine Verney, Daughter of the Rt. Hoñble Ralph Earl of Verney, of Little Chelsea in Middlesex."

Is that in your Hand an accurate Copy of the same?

Yes.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he proposed next to prove the Burial of the Honourable Elizabeth Verney, No. 26. in the Pedigree.

Then the Witness was further asked:

Do you produce the original Register of Burials in the Parish of Middle Claydon for 1767 ?

I do.

No. 15.

No. 16.

Rev. T. Wright.

No. 17.

No. 18.

No. 19.

Do you find there an Entry of the Burial of the Honourable Elizabeth
Verney?
Yes, I do.

Will you read the same?

The same was read as follows:

"Burials.

"1767, June 16th.-Hon. Elizabeth Verney, Aunt to the Right Hon. the Earl of Verney."

Is that in your Hand a correct Copy of that Entry examined by yourself? It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he proposed next to prove the Baptism of Verney Lovett, No. 28. in the Pedigree.

Then the Witness was further asked :

Have you the original Register of Baptisms for the Year 1705 ?
I have.

Will you turn to it, and see whether there is an Entry of the Baptism of Verney Lovett ?

There is.

Will you read the same?

The same was read as follows:
"Baptisms.

"1705, Decemb. 8.-Verney, Son of John Lovett, Esq', and Mary his Wife, Daughter of the La Visct Fermanagh."

Is that in your Hand a true Copy of that Entry?
It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr. Lewis stated, That he proposed next to prove the Baptism of Mary Lovett, No. 31, that the Date was not correctly stated in the printed Case; that it ought to be January instead of November.

Then the Witness was further asked :—

Will you turn to the original Register for 1709, and see whether you find there an Entry of the Baptism of Mary Lovett?

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

"1709, Jan 26th. Mary, Daughter of John Lovett, Esq., and Mary his Wife (born the 15th)."

Is that in your Hand a correct Copy of that Entry?

It is.

The same was delivered in.

Mr.

« ForrigeFortsett »