Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1895 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
Inni boken
Side 2
... motion . PUZZLE . Application of Frederick G. Kinyon filed May 9 , 1892 , No. 432,263 . Application of William T. Carter filed September 15 , 1891 , No. 405.776 . Messrs . C. A. Snow & Co. for Kinyon . Mr. John F. Kerr for Carter ...
... motion . PUZZLE . Application of Frederick G. Kinyon filed May 9 , 1892 , No. 432,263 . Application of William T. Carter filed September 15 , 1891 , No. 405.776 . Messrs . C. A. Snow & Co. for Kinyon . Mr. John F. Kerr for Carter ...
Side 12
... motion is appealable to the Commissioner both parties are heard before him . No valid reason appears to exist for making an exception when the motion is appealable to the Exam- iners - in - Chief and in allowing only one party to the ...
... motion is appealable to the Commissioner both parties are heard before him . No valid reason appears to exist for making an exception when the motion is appealable to the Exam- iners - in - Chief and in allowing only one party to the ...
Side 14
... motion was res adjudicata , inasmuch as that question had been passed upon by the Board of Examiners - in - Chief in their decision hold- ing that there was a sufficiency of disclosure in Westinghouse's appli- cation to warrant the ...
... motion was res adjudicata , inasmuch as that question had been passed upon by the Board of Examiners - in - Chief in their decision hold- ing that there was a sufficiency of disclosure in Westinghouse's appli- cation to warrant the ...
Side 15
... motion to dissolve which denies the patentability of an applicant's claim , or a motion to dissolve which denies the right of applicant to make the claim , or on a motion involv- ing the merits of the invention , the appeal to the ...
... motion to dissolve which denies the patentability of an applicant's claim , or a motion to dissolve which denies the right of applicant to make the claim , or on a motion involv- ing the merits of the invention , the appeal to the ...
Side 16
... motion be brought within twenty days , to hear both parties to this interference on any question which may result in its dissolution , and if appeal shall be taken from his decision it is directed that it be an inter partes appeal ...
... motion be brought within twenty days , to hear both parties to this interference on any question which may result in its dissolution , and if appeal shall be taken from his decision it is directed that it be an inter partes appeal ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States ..., Volum 914 United States. Patent Office Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1915 |
Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States ..., Volum 911 United States. Patent Office Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1912 |
Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in ... United States. Patent Office Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1946 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action alizarin alleged alumina aluminium anode apparatus appeal appellee application assignment attached bath bill Cable Railway Circuit Court claim combination Commissioner of Patents complainant complainant's connected consists construction court of equity covered cryolite dated David Bradley Decided decision decree defendant defendant's device dissolve District Edison electric electrolysis elements equity evidence Examiner Examiners-in-Chief fact filed fluoride granted Held improvement infringement injunction interference interference proceedings inventor issued Letters Patent machine main belt Manufacturing Company means mechanism ment metal motion operation original parties patent in suit Patent Office pipe pipe-box piston plaintiff plate practice present prior art prior patents priority of invention produce purpose question reason reduction to practice reference reissue rule shaft shown side specification spring spring device statute substantially as described Supreme Court testimony thereof tion trade-mark tube United validity valve void wire words
Populære avsnitt
Side 245 - It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties and those in privity with them, not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose...
Side 205 - Office a written description of the same, and of the manner and process of making, constructing, compounding, and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same...
Side 210 - Persons who not only have an interest in the controversy, but an interest of such a nature that a final decree cannot be made without either affecting that interest, or leaving the controversy in such a condition that its final termination may be wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience.
Side 178 - ... likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers.
Side 294 - any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof...
Side 126 - In considering the operation of this judgment, it. should be borne In mind, as stated by counsel, that there is a difference between the effect of a judgment as a bar or estoppel against the prosecution of a second action upon the same claim or demand, and its effect as an estoppel In another action between the same parties upon a different claim or cause of action.
Side 657 - Concurrent with the Court of Claims, of all claims not exceeding ten thousand dollars founded upon the Constitution of the United States or any law of Congress, or upon any regulation of an Executive Department, or upon any contract, express or implied, with the Government of the United States...
Side 691 - The claim is a statutory requirement, prescribed for the very purpose of making the patentee define precisely what his invention is ; and it is unjust to the public, as well as an evasion of the law, to construe it in a manner different from the plain import of its terms.
Side 656 - All claims founded upon the Constitution of the United States or any law of Congress, except for pensions, or upon any regulation of an Executive Department, or upon any contract, expressed or implied, with the Government of the United States...
Side 245 - From the variety of cases relative to judgments being given in evidence in civil suits these two deductions seem to follow as generally true: First, that the judgment of a court of concurrent jurisdiction directly upon the point is as a plea a bar, or as evidence, conclusive between the same parties upon the same matter directly in question in another court...