United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 520United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1999 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 6
... amendment to § 924 ( c ) , relied upon by the Court of Appeals , reads : " [ T ] he Committee intends that the mandatory sentence under the revised subsection 924 ( c ) be served prior to the start of the sentence for the underlying or ...
... amendment to § 924 ( c ) , relied upon by the Court of Appeals , reads : " [ T ] he Committee intends that the mandatory sentence under the revised subsection 924 ( c ) be served prior to the start of the sentence for the underlying or ...
Side 10
... amended § 924 ( c ) so that its sentencing en- hancement would apply regardless of whether the underly- ing felony ... amendment , however , eliminated these ambiguities . At that point , Congress made clear its desire to run § 924 ( c ) ...
... amended § 924 ( c ) so that its sentencing en- hancement would apply regardless of whether the underly- ing felony ... amendment , however , eliminated these ambiguities . At that point , Congress made clear its desire to run § 924 ( c ) ...
Side 13
... amended in 1970 to prohibit concurrent sentences , see Title II , Omnibus Crime Control Act of 1970 , 84 Stat . 1889 , this ... amendment was part of a general revision of sentencing laws that sought to achieve more uniformity and ...
... amended in 1970 to prohibit concurrent sentences , see Title II , Omnibus Crime Control Act of 1970 , 84 Stat . 1889 , this ... amendment was part of a general revision of sentencing laws that sought to achieve more uniformity and ...
Side 19
... amendment during patent prosecution is therefore irrelevant to any subsequent estoppel . There are a variety of reasons why the PTO may request a change in claim language , and if the patent holder demonstrates that an amendment had a ...
... amendment during patent prosecution is therefore irrelevant to any subsequent estoppel . There are a variety of reasons why the PTO may request a change in claim language , and if the patent holder demonstrates that an amendment had a ...
Side 30
... amendment during patent prosecution is irrelevant to any subsequent estoppel . In each of our cases cited by petitioner and by the dissent below , prosecution history estoppel was tied to amendments made to avoid the prior art , or ...
... amendment during patent prosecution is irrelevant to any subsequent estoppel . In each of our cases cited by petitioner and by the dissent below , prosecution history estoppel was tied to amendments made to avoid the prior art , or ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action administration expenses Alabama Amendment amici curiae apply argued the cause argument Arizona Article XXVIII Attorney authority benefits BREYER broadcast stations Bryan County burden cable systems Cable Television candidate certiorari claim Commerce Clause Congress constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals criminal curiae urging decision defendant dissenting District Court doctrine of equivalents dormant Commerce Clause drug duties election emphasis added employees enforcement ERISA Espinosa evidence federal court filed Government Ibid income interest issue Johnson judge judicial jurisdiction jury JUSTICE knock-and-announce liability limited marital deduction ment municipal must-carry Nevada Ninth Circuit NVRA officers parties patent pension petitioner petitioner's plaintiff plea pre-emption preclearance President prosecution history estoppel provision purpose question reasonable regulation remand rule Saratoga Fishing SCALIA sentence sheriff spouse Stat State's statute statutory STEVENS substantial Suitum Supp supra tion Title IV-D trial United violation voting Williamson County Yniguez