United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 520United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1999 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 60
Side 305
... candidates for designated state offices to cer- tify that they have taken a urinalysis drug test within 30 days prior to qualifying for nomination or election and that the test result was nega- tive . Petitioners , Libertarian Party ...
... candidates for designated state offices to cer- tify that they have taken a urinalysis drug test within 30 days prior to qualifying for nomination or election and that the test result was nega- tive . Petitioners , Libertarian Party ...
Side 306
... candidates who violate antidrug laws and is not a credible means to deter illicit drug users from seeking state office . The test date is se- lected by the candidate , and thus all but the prohibitively addicted could abstain for a ...
... candidates who violate antidrug laws and is not a credible means to deter illicit drug users from seeking state office . The test date is se- lected by the candidate , and thus all but the prohibitively addicted could abstain for a ...
Side 307
... candidates for public office attracts attention notably beyond the norm in ordinary work environments . What is left ... candidate's general health or on finan- cial disclosure requirements , and it does not speak to drug testing in the ...
... candidates for public office attracts attention notably beyond the norm in ordinary work environments . What is left ... candidate's general health or on finan- cial disclosure requirements , and it does not speak to drug testing in the ...
Side 308
... candidates for designated state offices to certify that they have taken a drug test and that the test result was negative . Ga . Code Ann . § 21-2-140 ( 1993 ) ( here- inafter §21-2-140 ) . We confront in this case the question whether ...
... candidates for designated state offices to certify that they have taken a drug test and that the test result was negative . Ga . Code Ann . § 21-2-140 ( 1993 ) ( here- inafter §21-2-140 ) . We confront in this case the question whether ...
Side 309
... candidate must present a certificate from a state- approved laboratory , in a form approved by the Secretary of State , reporting that the candidate submitted to a urinalysis drug test within 30 days prior to qualifying for nomination ...
... candidate must present a certificate from a state- approved laboratory , in a form approved by the Secretary of State , reporting that the candidate submitted to a urinalysis drug test within 30 days prior to qualifying for nomination ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action administration expenses Alabama Amendment amici curiae apply argued the cause argument Arizona Article XXVIII Attorney authority benefits BREYER broadcast stations Bryan County burden cable systems Cable Television candidate certiorari claim Commerce Clause Congress constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals criminal curiae urging decision defendant dissenting District Court doctrine of equivalents dormant Commerce Clause drug duties election emphasis added employees enforcement ERISA Espinosa evidence federal court filed Government Ibid income interest issue Johnson judge judicial jurisdiction jury JUSTICE knock-and-announce liability limited marital deduction ment municipal must-carry Nevada Ninth Circuit NVRA officers parties patent pension petitioner petitioner's plaintiff plea pre-emption preclearance President prosecution history estoppel provision purpose question reasonable regulation remand rule Saratoga Fishing SCALIA sentence sheriff spouse Stat State's statute statutory STEVENS substantial Suitum Supp supra tion Title IV-D trial United violation voting Williamson County Yniguez