United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 520United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1999 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 79
Side 1
... ( emphasis added ) -forbids a federal district court to direct that the section's mandatory 5 - year firearms sentence run concurrently with any other prison term , whether state or federal . Read naturally , the section's word " any ...
... ( emphasis added ) -forbids a federal district court to direct that the section's mandatory 5 - year firearms sentence run concurrently with any other prison term , whether state or federal . Read naturally , the section's word " any ...
Side 4
... ( emphasis deleted ) . If this statement were applied literally , respondents would have to serve first their state ... ( emphasis added ) . Opinion of the Court The question we face is whether 4 UNITED STATES v . GONZALES.
... ( emphasis deleted ) . If this statement were applied literally , respondents would have to serve first their state ... ( emphasis added ) . Opinion of the Court The question we face is whether 4 UNITED STATES v . GONZALES.
Side 22
... ( emphasis added ) . The inventors added the phrase " at a pH from approximately 6.0 to 9.0 " during patent prosecution . At a minimum , this phrase was added to distinguish a previous patent ( the " Booth " patent ) that disclosed an ...
... ( emphasis added ) . The inventors added the phrase " at a pH from approximately 6.0 to 9.0 " during patent prosecution . At a minimum , this phrase was added to distinguish a previous patent ( the " Booth " patent ) that disclosed an ...
Side 27
... ( Emphasis added . ) Thus , under this new provision , an applicant can describe an element of his invention by the result accomplished or the function served , rather than describing the item or element to be used ( e . g . , " a means ...
... ( Emphasis added . ) Thus , under this new provision , an applicant can describe an element of his invention by the result accomplished or the function served , rather than describing the item or element to be used ( e . g . , " a means ...
Side 31
... ( emphasis added ) . Similarly , in Keystone Driller Co. v . Northwest Engineering Corp. , 294 U. S. 42 ( 1935 ) , estoppel was applied where the initial claims were " rejected on the prior art , " id . , at 48 , n . 6 , and where the ...
... ( emphasis added ) . Similarly , in Keystone Driller Co. v . Northwest Engineering Corp. , 294 U. S. 42 ( 1935 ) , estoppel was applied where the initial claims were " rejected on the prior art , " id . , at 48 , n . 6 , and where the ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action administration expenses Alabama Amendment amici curiae apply argued the cause argument Arizona Article XXVIII Attorney authority benefits BREYER broadcast stations Bryan County burden cable systems Cable Television candidate certiorari claim Commerce Clause Congress constitutional Corp County Court of Appeals criminal curiae urging decision defendant dissenting District Court doctrine of equivalents dormant Commerce Clause drug duties election emphasis added employees enforcement ERISA Espinosa evidence federal court filed Government Ibid income interest issue Johnson judge judicial jurisdiction jury JUSTICE knock-and-announce liability limited marital deduction ment municipal must-carry Nevada Ninth Circuit NVRA officers parties patent pension petitioner petitioner's plaintiff plea pre-emption preclearance President prosecution history estoppel provision purpose question reasonable regulation remand rule Saratoga Fishing SCALIA sentence sheriff spouse Stat State's statute statutory STEVENS substantial Suitum Supp supra tion Title IV-D trial United violation voting Williamson County Yniguez