DS Brewer, 2000 - 297 sider
This book is concerned with the medieval idea of what constituted tragedy; it suggests that it was not a common term, and that those few who used the term did not always intend the same thing by it. Kelly believes that it was Chaucer's work which shaped notions of the genre, and places his achievement in critical and historical context. He begins by contrasting modern with medieval theoretical approaches to genres, then discusses Boccaccio's concept of tragedy before turning to Chaucer himself, exploring the ideas of tragedy prevalent in medieval England and their influence on Chaucer, and showing how Chaucer interpreted the term. Troilus and Criseyde is analysed specifically as a tragedy, with an account of its reception in modern times; for comparison, there is an analysis of how John Lydgate and Robert Henryson, two of Chaucer's imitators, understood and practiced tragedy.
Professor HENRY ANSGAR KELLY teaches at UCLA.
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
according action appears beginning Boccaccio Bochas Boethius called casibus cause chap chapter character Chaucer cited comedy comes conclude considered course Cresseid Criseyde death definition drawing dream earlier edition effect English example fact fall Fall of Princes final follows Fortune gedy genre given gives gloss gods goes happy Henryson idea instance interpretation John kind King Knight lamentation later Latin least Lydgate Lydgate's mean medieval Monk's Tale moral namely narrative nature notion perhaps persons Plautus plays poem poets Premierfait present princes prosperity question readers reason refers says seems seen Seneca sense shows similar simply sorrow sort speaking stanza story suggestion taken Tale tells term Testament ther things thought tion told tragedy tragic translation Trevet Troilus Troilus's Troy true virtue whereas women writing