The Pacific Reporter, Volum 219West Publishing Company, 1924 "Comprising all the decisions of the Supreme Courts of California, Kansas, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, Oklahoma, District Courts of Appeal and Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California and Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma." (varies) |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-3 av 70
Side 85
... Denied by Supreme Court Oct. 16, 1923.) 1. Mandamus <B=»I68{2)— All intendments In favor of action of court below. On mandamus in the district court of appeal to compel superior court to dismiss criminal prosecution, order of the trial ...
... Denied by Supreme Court Oct. 16, 1923.) 1. Mandamus <B=»I68{2)— All intendments In favor of action of court below. On mandamus in the district court of appeal to compel superior court to dismiss criminal prosecution, order of the trial ...
Side 211
... denied. It is deemed denied by our Code. The defendant is wrong in assuming that there is no denial of the affirmative defenses Jn the answer. They are denied. It Is pertinent to observe, however, that in the new matter pleaded in the ...
... denied. It is deemed denied by our Code. The defendant is wrong in assuming that there is no denial of the affirmative defenses Jn the answer. They are denied. It Is pertinent to observe, however, that in the new matter pleaded in the ...
Side 781
... denied that the bank had incurred a liability for the fee. This was a material issue, because, in this state, a provision for an attorney's fee in a note is regarded as to protect and indemnify the holder and not to enrich him, and he ...
... denied that the bank had incurred a liability for the fee. This was a material issue, because, in this state, a provision for an attorney's fee in a note is regarded as to protect and indemnify the holder and not to enrich him, and he ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
affirmed alleged amended amount answer Appeal from District assessment attorney authority bank bonds cause of action claim Coal county Commission concur Constitution contract corporation county court Court of Oklahoma Criminal law deceased decree deed defendant in error defendant's demurrer denied Digests and Indexes dismissed District Court Eltopia estoppel evidence executed fact favor fendant filed foreclosure heirs held injury instructions issue Jim Vance Joseph Bruner Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Key-Numbered Digests land lease lien ment mortgage motion negligence oil and gas Oklahoma City parties payment Payne county person petition plaintiff in error pleadings proceedings purchase question quiet title reason record rendered respondent rule statute sufficient Superior Court supra Supreme Court sustained testified testimony thereof tiff tion topic and KEY-NUMBER trial court verdict warrant Wash witness writ