 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1956 - 1010 sider
...that the Indians had a right of occupancy, although the fee was in the United States. In addition, the court said : "• • • the right of the Indians...as sacred as that of the United States to the fee, bat it is only a right of occupancy. The potsession, when abandoned 1>y the Indian*, attaehe* itself... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 728 sider
...The authority of that case has never been doubted.f The right of the Indians to their occupancy is us sacred as that of the United States to the fee, but it is only a right of occupancy.! The possession, when abandoned by the Indians, attaches itself to the fee without further grant.§... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1878 - 858 sider
...the authority of Johnton v. Mclntoah on this point had never been doubted. But, added the court, " the right of the Indians to their occupancy is as...States to the fee, but it is only a right of occupancy. The possession, when abandoned by the Indians, attaches itself to the fee without further grant." In... | |
 | 1907 - 2136 sider
...Cook, 19 Wall. 591, 593, 22 L. Ed. 210, the court, speaking through Mr. Chief Justice Waite, says: "The right of the Indians to their occupancy Is as...to the fee, but It Is only a right of occupancy." Yet later, in Beecher v. Wetherby, 95 US 517, 525, 24 L. Ed. 440, the court says : "But the right which... | |
 | United States. Department of Justice - 1881 - 792 sider
...United States ; but the Supreme Court of the United States has twice within the last ten years declared the right of the Indians to their occupancy is as sacred as that of the United States to the fee. ( United States v. Cook, 19 Wall., 593, top ; Beecher v. Wetherby, 95 U. 8., 526, top.) In delivering... | |
 | United States. Department of Justice - 1881 - 790 sider
...United States ; but the Supreme Court of the United States has twice within the last ten years declared the right of the Indians to their occupancy is as sacred as that of the United States to the fee. ( United States v. Cook, 19 Wall., 593, top ; Beecher v. Wetherby, 96 US, 526, top.) lu delivering... | |
 | United States. War Department - 1882 - 1020 sider
...United States; bnt the Supreme Court of the United States has* twice within the last ton years declared "the right of the Indians to their occupancy is as sacred as that of the United States to the fee." (United States vs. Cook, 19 Wait,, 593, top; Beecher re. Wctherby, 95 US, 526, top.) In delivering... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 914 sider
...574. The authority of that case has never been doubted. 1 Kent, 257; Worcester v. Go., 6 Pet, 580. The right of the Indians to their occupancy is as...that of the United States to the fee, but it is only aright of occupancy. Cherokee Nat. v. Qa. , 5 Pet. , 48. The possession, when abandoned by the Indians,... | |
 | United States. Department of the Interior - 1891 - 752 sider
...guaranteed to them as before stated. Says the supreme court in United States v. Cook (19 Wall., oOl) : the right of the Indians to their occupancy is as...States to the fee, but it is only a right of occupancy. The, possession when abandoned by the Indians attaches itself to the fee without further grant. This... | |
 | United States. Department of the Interior - 1891 - 756 sider
...guaranteed to them as before stated. Says the supreme court in United States v. Cook (19 Wall., 591): • the right of the Indians to their occupancy is as...as that of the United States to the fee, but it is ouly a right of occupancy. The possession when abandoned by the Indians attaches itself to the fee... | |
| |
The right of the Indians to their occupancy is as sacred as that of the United States to the fee, but it is only a right of occupancy. The possession, when abandoned by the Indians, attaches itself to the fee without further grant. 
